I bought a '92 Hatch the other day with B16 Block Type-R Head and a GS-R Tranny is that any good? I don't know much about Hondas. Some One Help Me!


Modified by Zero4488 at 5:34 PM 6/22/2005

 

Its ok.

 

you're driving it and you ask us if it's good?... right...

 

how does it feel? ....change out the gsr tranny for a b16 tranny.

 

Drop the GSR tranny for a ITR 4.785

My setup
b16a2 block
ITR head
ITR 4.785 FD LSD tranny
AN-R header
RSR GTII exhaust
8lb flywheel
Custom South bend clutch
Iceman intake
Crome

13.58@99 mph
2.2 60'
Headgasket blowing
no thermostat in.

 

thats a sweet cylinder head but u wont get full power from it with b16 bottom end!!!! basically you are not using the full potential of the head as the b16 bottom end does not rev high enough. This is assuming your bottom end is stock at the mo.

Get a b18c5 Type r bottom end and tranny and go all Genuine honda type r on it!!!!

sam

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by supaman111 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats a sweet cylinder head but u wont get full power from it with b16 bottom end!!!! basically you are not using the full potential of the head as the b16 bottom end does not rev high enough. This is assuming your bottom end is stock at the mo.

Get a b18c5 Type r bottom end and tranny and go all Genuine honda type r on it!!!!

sam </TD></TR></TABLE>

Dont speak for all B16's My 100% stock bottom end has been revving to 9000-9500 RPM's for over 2 years Only thing i got is ARP head studs and everything else is OEM

 

serious, thats a sweet b16 block man, thought pistons would be oil starved at those revs cuz ctr or itr pistons are utalized for extra oiling.

as you can appreciate making the b16 rev higher in stock form is not the Honda way, but saying that, they do build their **** good.

 

Thanks Guys.....if anyone has anymore info please post. This was much appreciated.....

 

The Smaller the motor the more the Rev's, my b16 with a worked head rev'd 9800-10000 all day with head studs and a cometic gasket

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM99Hatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Smaller the motor the more the Rev's, my b16 with a worked head rev'd 9800-10000 all day with head studs and a cometic gasket</TD></TR></TABLE>

who told you that lie if you have smaller motor the more it rev's? ....so if i had a jdm d15b it revs more?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM99Hatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Smaller the motor the more the Rev's, my b16 with a worked head rev'd 9800-10000 all day with head studs and a cometic gasket</TD></TR></TABLE>

rod ratio d00d, displacement has nothing to do with it. the longer the rod to stroke ratio, the higher the motor can rev safely.

 

BMW have a 5.0 ltr v10 that revs to 8250 rpm

 

all in all i think your setup is not bad, it has alot of potential if you look at the way JDMlysfestyle has modified his motor. ITR box would be a good move.

 

Get some big cams to take advantage of the ported head and your good r/s ratio...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sam1am26 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get some big cams to take advantage of the ported head and your good r/s ratio...</TD></TR></TABLE>

i wouldnt call a PR3-R head ported. it has the the area just behind the valve seat debured and smoothed out. i beleive some called this the bowl area in another thread.