All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

11.8:1 Or higher Safe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #1  
BryanEk's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Default 11.8:1 Or higher Safe?

On a daily driven all motor car would 11.8:1 c/r be safe to drive everyday, given that things are built correctly and i dont rev the crap out of it every light?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #2  
SirTobywun's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: houston, tx, usa
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

bump would like to know
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:01 AM
  #3  
ceLtic's Avatar
N/A wh0re!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: jersey y0
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (LoRdShishi0)

not in california with your shitty 91 octane.

i run 12.8:1 on 94 and im fine.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #4  
BryanEk's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (ceLtic)

I have a gsr in an ek hatch. I am debating between itr pistons or ctr. I know that ctr would bump to like 12.2:1 or higher. I would love to be that high but I dont want to blow anything up. So on 91 oct that would not be safe?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:08 AM
  #5  
SiRLudeVtec's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

So if i'm able to get 94 octane here in Indy, what is the range of Compression ratios i can achieve? I'm going to throw the Skunk2 stageII cams on here pretty soon.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #6  
ceLtic's Avatar
N/A wh0re!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: jersey y0
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (AJBurks)

i am fine on 93/94 with close to 13:1 compression ratio with the PCT'S[ctr pistons].

just get it tuned on 93/94. i do get A TINY bit of pinging at like 2000rpms in 5th gear at WOT. then again who drives like that on a daily basis? its nothing to be worried about. and im not on any engine management either.


basically, if you get engine management and 93 octane, the pinging can be completely dialed out.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #7  
BryanEk's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (ceLtic)

I live CA. So pretty much Im screwed and have to run p73 (i think thats what the itr's are) and stay below 11.8:1 than? I cant get a hold of 93 or 94 that easy and 91 oct is already 2.50 a gallon as it is...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #8  
aznboysrfr's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Niguel / Aliso Viejo, Cali, USA
Default

california 91 octane is ****. we should get 93+
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
regamaster's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Land of the Lost, usa
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BryanEk &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I live CA. So pretty much Im screwed and have to run p73 (i think thats what the itr's are) and stay below 11.8:1 than? I cant get a hold of 93 or 94 that easy and 91 oct is already 2.50 a gallon as it is...</TD></TR></TABLE>

You can go bigger then a ITR pistons. I am running them in my street car and have had not problems. I am currently going up to 12:1 and should be fine. Just retard the timing if you need to.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #10  
BryanEk's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (regamaster)

would retarding the timing lower the c/r a bit? Cause i would love to have the most c/r that i could have given the ctr and itr pistons cost the same...
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #11  
efit's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: virginia beach, virgina, u.s
Default

how much will itr pistons bump the c/r up in a b16 ?
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #12  
itralex's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,, British Columbia, Canada
Default Re: (efit)

i was running 12.4 on 94
i had no problems with pinging unless the car had a **** load of load on it

i.e. going up a steep hill in 5th
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 12:08 PM
  #13  
regamaster's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 0
From: Land of the Lost, usa
Default Re: (efit)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by efit &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how much will itr pistons bump the c/r up in a b16 ?</TD></TR></TABLE>

US ITR pistons will lower the C/R, on b16
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #14  
LSVTEC 91 Civic's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 1
From: Canada
Default Re: (regamaster)

I'm running about 12.4:1, with 93 and stock timing.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 01:29 PM
  #15  
Viper8L488's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area, CA, United States
Default Re: (LSVTEC 91 Civic)

We need to start a petition in CA to oust the shitty gas and get the hook up on some 93/94 octane at the pump. Higher octane means cleaner burning right . The rest of the hippie tree huggers in CA should go for it!
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 03:46 PM
  #16  
BryanEk's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Default Re: (Viper8L488)

that will never pass. There are way too many socialist bastards in ca for that to ever pass, we have 91oct for a reason. Because ca sucks
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #17  
SuperTwinz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

It's all about tunning.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #18  
HondaIntegraR's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Fresno, Ca, USA
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (SuperTwinz)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BryanEk &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">would retarding the timing lower the c/r a bit? Cause i would love to have the most c/r that i could have given the ctr and itr pistons cost the same...</TD></TR></TABLE>

i dont think retarting the timing would decrease compression, i think 11.5 cr is as high as you wanna go for cali 91...thats what im soon to be running
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #19  
vtec y0's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: Southside ATL
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (HondaIntegraR)

Gas prices are Killer
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #20  
ceLtic's Avatar
N/A wh0re!
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: jersey y0
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (HondaIntegraR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HondaIntegraR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

i dont think retarting the timing would decrease compression, i think 11.5 cr is as high as you wanna go for cali 91...thats what im soon to be running</TD></TR></TABLE>

this is roughly the max compression for 91 octane.

94 could handle slightly more then 13:1 comp.

to cali gas laws

thing that i find quite odd is that many guys in california make over 220whp on 91 octane. i personally think its bullshit, unless they have enough money to run race gas in a daily driver, which is probably what most guys do out there.

but if you can find 93/94 in cali, you should be good to go with 13:1 comp and decent tuning.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2005 | 08:49 PM
  #21  
AdamBOMB_STi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Fairfield, CA
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

im running daily on 91 in a gsr with itr pistons with stock cams which give me a static comp ratio of 11.7-11.8. no octane boost, no pinging. just advanced the timing and still untuned. soon to have a chipped p28 and b&m fpr next week.
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 07:32 AM
  #22  
neeks's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (kwik_B16)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1180600
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #23  
SuperTwinz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 0
From: California
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (BryanEk)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=762934
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #24  
Mattb16teg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,458
Likes: 13
From: Maryland
Default Re: 11.8:1 Or higher Safe? (SuperTwinz)

im running around 12:6:1 with 93 and it seems fine, just hoping the summer heat wont bring any problems.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #25  
EJ1enkeiRSE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
From: Socal, CA, USA
Default Re: (aznboysrfr)

hell yea california has some sorry as octane
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:15 PM.