removing p/s, now what about crank pulley?
okay, we all know lighter is better, and furthermore, mass towards the middle is
for less rotational inertia, but more to the point: a/c is staying! daily driver in florida, and my woman would kill me if i removed the a/c, even though I never use it (she does when she's a passenger). and i've done a lot of research, and i believe personally that there is great need for a damper on the crankshaft, but go ahead and vote for the best option after removing p/s, but keeping a/c. by the way, the p/s part of the crank pulley is the one farthest from the block.
edit: yeah, i was not in my right mind when i made this thread, sorry. i should have included "don't fix it if it ain't broke" as one of the responses. oh well, "other" will have to do.
Modified by 95lstegman at 5:12 PM 3/8/2005
for less rotational inertia, but more to the point: a/c is staying! daily driver in florida, and my woman would kill me if i removed the a/c, even though I never use it (she does when she's a passenger). and i've done a lot of research, and i believe personally that there is great need for a damper on the crankshaft, but go ahead and vote for the best option after removing p/s, but keeping a/c. by the way, the p/s part of the crank pulley is the one farthest from the block.edit: yeah, i was not in my right mind when i made this thread, sorry. i should have included "don't fix it if it ain't broke" as one of the responses. oh well, "other" will have to do.
Modified by 95lstegman at 5:12 PM 3/8/2005
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AlxSiR7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">..just leave it the way it is
</TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AlxSiR7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">..just leave it the way it is
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i will agree also
</TD></TR></TABLE>i will agree also
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



