Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

NA withdrawl

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #1  
Mr. Roboto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: A city near you, Minnehoho, United States
Default NA withdrawl

wassup guys/gals,

I'm having some serious NA withdrawls since I went turbo with the R. I love turbo and have yet to get my final tune, but I feel like I should have left it NA. I know the Type R wasn't meant for turbo, but I made it into a redheaded stepchild turbo monster and the feeling to turn everything back NA again is on my mind. Maybe it's just the cold season thats bothering me, but what do guys think?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #2  
#1151's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
From: In The 858
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

like they say "once you go black....you never go back"
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:29 AM
  #3  
white rocket's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: vancity
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

I have recently been debating whether or not to boost my R. I have seen some pretty impressive #'s on N/A R's lately and boosting scares me in terms of reliability. If you've put a lot of time and effort towards your turbo set-up and are just waiting for the final tune I'd say keep it boosted. Just my $0.02
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:32 AM
  #4  
revvin9k's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,745
Likes: 0
From: TRY IT..dare ya. ;)
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

I'd say stay boosted, you'll def. miss the torque if you go to NA.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #5  
Cosworth's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,402
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

my honest opinion? if you want NA & torqure, sell the R and get a E46 M3.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #6  
Mr. Roboto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: A city near you, Minnehoho, United States
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Cosworth)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cosworth &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">my honest opinion? if you want NA & torqure, sell the R and get a E46 M3. </TD></TR></TABLE>


I will never sell my Intega Type R, me love her long time.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:52 AM
  #7  
JOHN WAYNE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: FIND ME ON ******.COM
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

if you were to sell your turbo components and use the money to rebuild your block to 2.0L specs with nice forged internals you would have a very nice and reliable setup WITH some torque.

obviously youll never make the same power you do with boost but just consider this...

on BBC's motoring show Top Gear ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/ ) they once said that a FWD car shouldnt have more than 240bhp. this comment was made after driving a saab 95 on their test track so you can take that however you like.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 11:54 AM
  #8  
Flux's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO, USA
Default Re: NA withdrawl (JOHN WAYNE)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JOHN WAYNE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you were to sell your turbo components and use the money to rebuild your block to 2.0L specs with nice forged internals you would have a very nice and reliable setup WITH some torque.

obviously youll never make the same power you do with boost but just consider this...

on BBC's motoring show Top Gear ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/topgear/ ) they once said that a FWD car shouldnt have more than 240bhp. this comment was made after driving a saab 95 on their test track so you can take that however you like.</TD></TR></TABLE>

For a long time people have been speculating on the theoretical HP limit that a FF layout could handle well...
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
JOHN WAYNE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: FIND ME ON ******.COM
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Flux)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flux &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

For a long time people have been speculating on the theoretical HP limit that a FF layout could handle well...</TD></TR></TABLE>

incidentally the guys on Top Gear rave about the EP3 CTR and i believe that it is the fastest FF car around their track so far.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:05 PM
  #10  
DontBlink's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
From: Youngwood, pa, usa
Default Re: NA withdrawl (JOHN WAYNE)

winters almost over, get your final tune then make up your mind. you came this far, id get the final tune and enjoy it then decide, because then the question will always be there "i wonder what id would be like if i got that final tune?"
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #11  
Mr. Roboto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: A city near you, Minnehoho, United States
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Flux)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Flux &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For a long time people have been speculating on the theoretical HP limit that a FF layout could handle well...</TD></TR></TABLE>

I wonder the same question as well, I just feel that I went against what the R was meant for.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2005 | 12:52 PM
  #12  
tnord's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
From: Future Site of the Runoffs, USA
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

sacrifice maximum hp and big boost for 0 turbo lag. get that boost on tap as early as possible and don't make it a peaky dyno queen. basically make it act like a NA or supercharged car.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 04:12 AM
  #13  
gtierrr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr. Roboto &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I wonder the same question as well, I just feel that I went against what the R was meant for.</TD></TR></TABLE>

in all reality u did go agaisnt type r, type r is made for high comp high rpm torque, not low comp big boost. i love the feeling of boost dont get me wrong( i still cant get over the feeling of a friends STI rex with big boost, not 2 mention i eat it anyday) but u gotta decide what u want, personally id prefer my r to run higher comp (talking 13:1) and not have to deal with stupid over heating and other problems turbos create.

my 2 cents, but create goals and make decisions, u'll decide whats best ( but i sure as hell no that i wouldn wanna melt my r pistons bcos i decide to move from 6 to 12 psi)
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 06:00 AM
  #14  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

i drove my na-R hatch last night and it was so refreshing...

but I :heart: my turbo R.....

just get a light beater and run that NA... best of both worlds.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 06:36 AM
  #15  
1115R's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: kzoo, MI, usa
Default

hard to beat the relyabulity of the na set up...
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 06:45 AM
  #16  
SecretAgent's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
From: tx, USA
Default Re: (1115R)

actually a mild turbo car will beat it quite easily. running a small turbo, neptune, 550cc's, walbro 255, and other minor mods will easily get you 230-280whp with no ill effects, and will romp on anything but a fully built monster NA car, and even then it will be a very close match.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #17  
Mr. Roboto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: A city near you, Minnehoho, United States
Default Re: (SecretAgent)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SecretAgent &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">actually a mild turbo car will beat it quite easily. running a small turbo, neptune, 550cc's, walbro 255, and other minor mods will easily get you 230-280whp with no ill effects, and will romp on anything but a fully built monster NA car, and even then it will be a very close match.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i'm going for 350-400hp and I have a beater 92 cx. I just love that high compression NA feel, but I think the reality is I'm wondering about reliability. I also plan to track it every once and a while too.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 09:53 AM
  #18  
ITRacer121's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,650
Likes: 0
From: Some Where, TX, USA
Default

I have been comtimplating going to the dark side but have kept it away from the R for the fear of ruining its track ability
plus even though my dyno numbers are low being NA I can still hang with my friends cars that are higher with turbo
NO LAG OWNS! Muahahhah
&lt;---figures he has spent enough on his NA setup to have turboed by now
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 01:14 PM
  #19  
DC2IntegraTypeR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Default

Flame on for saying this but...

It's not about power, it's all about balance. And an ITR is probably the most perfectly balanced FWD NA car ever.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #20  
old_school_dohcvtec's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Default Re: (RisforTypeR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RisforTypeR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Flame on for saying this but...

It's not about power, it's all about balance. And an ITR is probably the most perfectly balanced FWD NA car ever.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i agree
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #21  
gtierrr's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Default Re: (RisforTypeR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RisforTypeR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It's not about power, it's all about balance. And an ITR is probably the most perfectly balanced FWD NA car ever.</TD></TR></TABLE>

someone coulndt have said that better
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #22  
Dr Pooface's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 1
From: Vancity, b.c, CANADA
Default Re: (gtierrr)

"The type R is made for this, the type r is made for that..."

BULLSHIT

It's just a car. It's made for whatever YOU want to do with it. I went boost because I wanted to go faster. You want to go slower, go NA, it's all the same to me.

And about turbo not being safe? It's all about the tuning. I'm confidant mine will hold up fine on the road course. Come march, we'll see for sure.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 07:20 PM
  #23  
vtec.dc2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Default Re: NA withdrawl (Mr. Roboto)

if you're worried about reliability, then you already have a beater.. if you can't afford to rebuild and feel like your motor can still survive n/a.. then sell turbo kit so you can keep the r. but if you got the $$$$ for rebuild/repair, then go for it.. why drive with less hp. if you want to track it.. get something for smaller powerband, boost controller and you can have something good for all types of driving.

and winter sucks for driving turdlow cars, you can get it tuned, otherwise wait another month
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2005 | 07:33 PM
  #24  
vtec.dc2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,112
Likes: 0
Default Re: NA withdrawl (gtierrr)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gtierrr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

in all reality u did go agaisnt type r, type r is made for high comp high rpm torque, not low comp big boost. i love the feeling of boost dont get me wrong( i still cant get over the feeling of a friends STI rex with big boost, not 2 mention i eat it anyday) but u gotta decide what u want, personally id prefer my r to run higher comp (talking 13:1) and not have to deal with stupid over heating and other problems turbos create.</TD></TR></TABLE>

you don't have to have low compression for boost and many people don't. i run 10:1 on forged pistons/rods, i'm at 260whp and smallest t3/t4.. torque peaks much earlier and hp keeps climbing all the way to 8700rpm. no matter how you look at it problem wise, there are many things to worry about and more when high hp n/a setup fully built vs turbocharged stock setup (making same hp as fully built n/a setup). but main thing to worry about is money for repairs, if you don't have it don't mess with it in the first place. itr is so peacefull stock
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dmc1
Forced Induction
11
Jan 27, 2006 08:28 PM
egctreg
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
12
Dec 9, 2005 05:21 AM
chuckles2
Forced Induction
1
Mar 13, 2005 01:22 AM
ChicoAccord2001
Forced Induction
7
Sep 7, 2004 05:52 PM
tan2
Forced Induction
3
Sep 3, 2003 06:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 PM.