2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01
100% stock motor
10.5 psi (limited by injector size)
2.5 inch turbo-back straight pipe

<U>good for about 275-280ish on a dynojet</U>
visit:
http://p1auto.com/forum/index.php
to see how it stacks up against other plots
enjoy
P.S.
below is the same car with stock exhaust, untuned and 7psi
10.5 psi (limited by injector size)
2.5 inch turbo-back straight pipe

<U>good for about 275-280ish on a dynojet</U>
visit:
http://p1auto.com/forum/index.php
to see how it stacks up against other plots
enjoy
P.S.
below is the same car with stock exhaust, untuned and 7psi
not too impressive
I never said it was...
customer is happy and that is what matters
BTW: a stock EP3 puts down around 126ish HP.
I never said it was...
customer is happy and that is what matters
BTW: a stock EP3 puts down around 126ish HP.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not too impressive
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what are you talking about, that looks pretty good to me for stock internals...
and those #'s are on a mustang dyno.... not a dyno jet where they would read higher......
nice tq and hp curves....
</TD></TR></TABLE>what are you talking about, that looks pretty good to me for stock internals...
and those #'s are on a mustang dyno.... not a dyno jet where they would read higher......
nice tq and hp curves....
i was paying more attention to the lower graph. didnt mean to sound like an ***. just thought 10.5psi was high for those numbers and the numbers at 7psi are what most of us make with bolt-ons and hondata. but as long as the customers happy that really is what matters.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i was paying more attention to the lower graph. didnt mean to sound like an ***. just thought 10.5psi was high for those numbers and the numbers at 7psi are what most of us make with bolt-ons and hondata. but as long as the customers happy that really is what matters.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to see a bolt-on EP3 make 175 peak ft./lbs. of torque
I'd like to see a bolt-on EP3 make 175 peak ft./lbs. of torque
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">158whp is what im making with no reflash. my buddy is making 175whp tuned with k-pro, cai, dcrh, t1r catback, hondata img. saw the "let alone 177 whp" before you edited it changed. thats what im talking about.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, I retracted my whp statement because I knew that someone somewhere was going to dyno 170+ WHP with boltons. However, I have never seen the torque that high
Well, I retracted my whp statement because I knew that someone somewhere was going to dyno 170+ WHP with boltons. However, I have never seen the torque that high
yeah, i havent either. but seriously, that turbo should make more hp than that at 7 pounds
you do understand the difference between Mustang Dyno numbers and Dynojet numbers correct??
you do understand the difference between Mustang Dyno numbers and Dynojet numbers correct??
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aznbo1626 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's because of the motor. it's not a Type S motor. Good dyno numbers though
</TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




