Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3 Includes DC5 Integra Type R & 5dr Civic hatchback

2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:12 PM
  #1  
B18CXr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 1
From: NC, USA
Default 2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01

100% stock motor
10.5 psi (limited by injector size)
2.5 inch turbo-back straight pipe



<U>good for about 275-280ish on a dynojet</U>


visit:

http://p1auto.com/forum/index.php

to see how it stacks up against other plots

enjoy


P.S.

below is the same car with stock exhaust, untuned and 7psi

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:32 PM
  #2  
thabends's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Default Re: 2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01 (B18CXr)

not too impressive
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:56 PM
  #3  
B18CXr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 1
From: NC, USA
Default Re: 2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01 (thabends)

not too impressive

I never said it was...
customer is happy and that is what matters


BTW: a stock EP3 puts down around 126ish HP.

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #4  
cmdr430's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 5
From: ILM, NC
Default Re: 2003 EP3 with Greddy Turbo Kit, IC and EV-01 (thabends)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not too impressive </TD></TR></TABLE>

what are you talking about, that looks pretty good to me for stock internals...

and those #'s are on a mustang dyno.... not a dyno jet where they would read higher......

nice tq and hp curves....
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 01:59 PM
  #5  
thabends's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Default

i was paying more attention to the lower graph. didnt mean to sound like an ***. just thought 10.5psi was high for those numbers and the numbers at 7psi are what most of us make with bolt-ons and hondata. but as long as the customers happy that really is what matters.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
EtherGhost's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: MN
Default Re: (thabends)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i was paying more attention to the lower graph. didnt mean to sound like an ***. just thought 10.5psi was high for those numbers and the numbers at 7psi are what most of us make with bolt-ons and hondata. but as long as the customers happy that really is what matters.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'd like to see a bolt-on EP3 make 175 peak ft./lbs. of torque
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:13 PM
  #7  
thabends's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Default

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #8  
EtherGhost's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: MN
Default Re: (thabends)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thabends &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">158whp is what im making with no reflash. my buddy is making 175whp tuned with k-pro, cai, dcrh, t1r catback, hondata img. saw the "let alone 177 whp" before you edited it changed. thats what im talking about.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well, I retracted my whp statement because I knew that someone somewhere was going to dyno 170+ WHP with boltons. However, I have never seen the torque that high
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:23 PM
  #9  
thabends's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Default Re: (EtherGhost)

yeah, i havent either. but seriously, that turbo should make more hp than that at 7 pounds. maybe im crazy.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #10  
DC5ITR329's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 1
From: Arcadia, CA, USA
Default Re: (thabends)

it's because of the motor. it's not a Type S motor. Good dyno numbers though
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 03:30 PM
  #11  
B18CXr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,790
Likes: 1
From: NC, USA
Default Re: (thabends)

yeah, i havent either. but seriously, that turbo should make more hp than that at 7 pounds


you do understand the difference between Mustang Dyno numbers and Dynojet numbers correct??
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #12  
kung fu grip's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA, USA
Default

i need to make my way out to your shop one day when i have time, jack.

maybe one day, i'll just bring both cars and a blank check. one car for you to turbo, the other for bob.

nice work! :up:
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #13  
DANGERDOOM's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
From: Sonsonate, El Salvador
Default Re: (aznbo1626)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aznbo1626 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">it's because of the motor. it's not a Type S motor. Good dyno numbers though </TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EP3tune2RULE
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
9
Mar 14, 2005 08:00 PM
B18CXr
Forced Induction
4
Feb 9, 2005 02:10 PM
goofball123321
Forced Induction
4
Jul 3, 2004 12:11 AM
blackjdmek9
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
Apr 29, 2004 06:35 AM
Sleeping4drLS
Forced Induction
13
May 27, 2003 09:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 AM.