Massive Drop and Wheel Alignment
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Atlantic City, NJ, United States
Hey guys. I just did a massive drop on my 5th Gen and the camber is good but the front wheel alignment is duck-footed. Anyone else notice that after a significant drop? I'm just gonna let the car sit on the new coilovers for a week or so and then take it to get an alignment. It should be good after that. Anyone have any feedback? Thanks.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
when you lower ride height it not only affects camber, but caster and toe as well. a week shouldn't be a big deal, but the car will drive a little funny, and it might accelerate wear.
btw TOE is the killer of tires. Camber has little to do with premature wear.
btw TOE is the killer of tires. Camber has little to do with premature wear.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Atlantic City, NJ, United States
I haven't been driving the car. Just letting it sit in my driveway and giving the coilovers time to settle. I was thinking about getting an alignment done after a week cuz I need to drive but I think I might let it sit another week. I made it through this past week with no problems so.... whats another week?
Trending Topics
strange
so if camber isnt the primary culprit, i guess when ive gotten spec sheets after the alignment the toe is what im looking for? I thought they could set the toe, to 0 even.. so should i just get that done and not worry about camber kits? or does camber influence toe which causes wear..
whats the dilly
so if camber isnt the primary culprit, i guess when ive gotten spec sheets after the alignment the toe is what im looking for? I thought they could set the toe, to 0 even.. so should i just get that done and not worry about camber kits? or does camber influence toe which causes wear..
whats the dilly
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,633
Likes: 1
From: Off THE 60, Between THE 605 and THE 57
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by psilo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">strange
so if camber isnt the primary culprit, i guess when ive gotten spec sheets after the alignment the toe is what im looking for? I thought they could set the toe, to 0 even.. so should i just get that done and not worry about camber kits? or does camber influence toe which causes wear..
whats the dilly</TD></TR></TABLE>
as long as the toe is 0 (or as close as they can get to 0, they'll sometimes get .23, .12, .32) your tires should be fine and you don't need a camber kit. Camber kits are for people that need MORE neg. camber, and they should be sold that way, but it doesn't really benefit the mfr's to tell people that.
camber, toe, and caster are all related to each other, and they are all related to the rest of the suspension geometry, so whenever you change ride ht. or other parts of the geometry changes, all 3 (Camber toe caster) change with it.
so if camber isnt the primary culprit, i guess when ive gotten spec sheets after the alignment the toe is what im looking for? I thought they could set the toe, to 0 even.. so should i just get that done and not worry about camber kits? or does camber influence toe which causes wear..
whats the dilly</TD></TR></TABLE>
as long as the toe is 0 (or as close as they can get to 0, they'll sometimes get .23, .12, .32) your tires should be fine and you don't need a camber kit. Camber kits are for people that need MORE neg. camber, and they should be sold that way, but it doesn't really benefit the mfr's to tell people that.
camber, toe, and caster are all related to each other, and they are all related to the rest of the suspension geometry, so whenever you change ride ht. or other parts of the geometry changes, all 3 (Camber toe caster) change with it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93accordf22a
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
7
Jan 20, 2009 08:26 AM



