B&M Short Shifter Question
I am about to order a short shifter from hopupracing.com, and they have 2 options to choose from,
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raynaud »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I am about to order a short shifter from hopupracing.com, and they have 2 options to choose from,
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DJ_SaNdOz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ditto.................. Nice piece!
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ditto.................. Nice piece!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mraza
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
18
Apr 10, 2007 08:53 AM




