B&M Short Shifter Question
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sault Ste. Marie, MI, USA
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B&M Short Shifter Question
I am about to order a short shifter from hopupracing.com, and they have 2 options to choose from,
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Re: B&M Short Shifter Question (raynaud)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by raynaud »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I am about to order a short shifter from hopupracing.com, and they have 2 options to choose from,
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
&
45047-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 49% Throw Reduction 30%
I'm just curious as to what the main diffrence between the two is? is it just the final position of the shift ****? and if so which one do you all think is the most comfortable?
I don't sit back all ghetto thug like... but I don't like to be too close to the wheel, just a comfortable moderate distance where the shifter will be easy to reach.(if that helps at all)
thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.
#3
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B&M Short Shifter Question (DJ_SaNdOz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DJ_SaNdOz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ditto.................. Nice piece!
I had this one:
45075-BMR Honda Civic 1988-2000; 46% Throw Reduction Straight Stick
In my EF & since it was straight, the shifter almost looked like it was in 1st when it was in N, it took a while to get used to the position, but it's not bad, and it's solid as hell.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ditto.................. Nice piece!
#5
Electrician
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
senior gold member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dont fake, the funk, earf
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B&M Short Shifter Question (raynaud)
I use to have the straight one. I liked it better then the curved one. To me it had a more solid feeling.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post