few months back i had a post about my car not running right. over that span of time i slowy worked all the bugs out.
the post about it https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1014770
got the car running perfect 2 days b4 i had to go talk about close



the set up
gsr block
LS crank & rods
ARP Rod bolts
JDM ITR 25 os pistons (11.6:1)
Balanced and weight matched

Head and intake manifold were ported & polished by WBR
RC 4mm gsr overbore t-body
rc 310 injectors
skunk2 stage2 cams
skunk2 cam gears
ebay js racing replica with k&N filter
type R intake valves
Skunk2 dual valve springs & retainers
ITR lost motion assembly
profab header
kteller 2.5 exhaust catless all the way to a 2.5 es oval

type r tranny 4.4fd
Fidanza 7.5lb flywheel
ACT AI4XTSS clutch

neptune was used for engine management

i used some ngk bkr6e-11 plugs gaped to .035
valve lash was set to .007in .008ex

so for people who wounder about the profab header it looks like it worked pretty good on my car for the money i give it a big
and to jeff he is one amazing tuner we started around 11 and didnt leave till 5

oh yea thanks to pete my friend who helped me out so much
caz i suck with directions


Modified by hayabusa160 at 12:56 PM 12/10/2004


Modified by hayabusa160 at 12:15 AM 12/21/2004

 

http://www.we-todd-did-racing....D.jpg
incase anyone cares these are the times i ran without vtec shifting at 7k number 705
my car made 150hp at jeffs without vtec

 

is it me or is the dyno sheet blank? i would like to know the hp/tq i have a similar set up and am curious.

hector

 

Good numbers. Jeff is a good guy and a good tuner. I will be calling him soon to tune my car again. The first time my all motor gsr had a lot air flow restriction cause of the mugen header but now I got a better header and a different setup.

 

its about 202hp around 146 torque u guys need a better computer screen or somethin

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hayabusa160 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its about 202hp around 146 torque u guys need a better computer screen or somethin </TD></TR></TABLE>

WOW! nice #'s

 

Sorry, I saved the graph on the flash disk and the file was corrupted when I got home so I will get it when I'm at the shop tomorrow.

Nice numbers too!

 

i got the profabheader too. and a dyno appt on jan 6th. we shall see how it works with my setup

 

sweet thanks dude. i framed the dyno print out lol ***** above my desk

 

for you blind people i traced it over with mspaint the lines are smooth its just my shitty hand cordination tracing lines


that dip at the upper rpm was pretty bad jeff did his best to smooth it out. there was another one around the 5k range he tuned that one up and made the biggest gain around that area

oh yea, on way home i forgot i still had my ac belt on lol that could have free up a few more hp

 

does anybody think that this set-up is conservatively tuned , not maxed out? Good numbers though! any pics of the engine just want to see the header

 

Jeff evans tunes the cars to where they get a good air+fuel ratio and doesn't push the motor to limit.

 

200 on a dynapack is roughly 185 on a dynojet right?
I also like my profab header alot.

 

sweet dyno matt!!! So I guess that means we have to run each other! LOL

 

 

nice numbers

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mentat Ghola &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">200 on a dynapack is roughly 185 on a dynojet right?
I also like my profab header alot. </TD></TR></TABLE>

this car should make more than 200whp on a dynojet.

Its getting annoying how everyone just automatically knows the difference based on the type of dyno. It reads how you calibrate it. The cars ive seen dyno on jeff's dyno then on another dyno jet tend to read alittle LOWER on jeff's dyno.

 

this is true my friends h22 with anr header. aem cold air intake, and exhaust put down 189 at jeffs dyno. sounds close enough for me.
anyway its just numbers lol more important thing is how much more damn fun it is to drive this car.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SioneSi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">does anybody think that this set-up is conservatively tuned , not maxed out? Good numbers though! any pics of the engine just want to see the header </TD></TR></TABLE>

Those are some low numbers. I have seen the same setup with 217whp on a Dynojet.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mpir3 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

this car should make more than 200whp on a dynojet.

Its getting annoying how everyone just automatically knows the difference based on the type of dyno. It reads how you calibrate it. The cars ive seen dyno on jeff's dyno then on another dyno jet tend to read alittle LOWER on jeff's dyno.</TD></TR></TABLE>

oh ok. MAn that LS crank sure brings up the torque. Im hiting 200 on a dynamics dyno with basically the same setup but a GSR crank and crower stage II and my torque is only 133. Theres definitely more potential in this motor.

 

great numbers man!!!

i had my b16 tuned on his dynapak.

jeff's dynapack actually reads about %5 lower than dynojet.

although we've seen most dynapaks reading higher than dynojet.

 

nice #'s

 

I know most people say that dynapacks tend to read high, and they do (hub hp), and recently ive seen jeff post that his dynapack reads low. I have a hard time believing this to a point simply because i havent seen it before. (doesnt mean its not true)

I know with mustangs and dyno dynamics and brake dynos you enter certain parameters and can controll the output of the dyno.

Isnt there something like the ramp time or something like that you can change on a dynapack that can affect output??

Either way, these numbers look right on par w/ a dynojet to me. So either way good #'s. Why dont u prove it to everyone and make a pass on a dynojet and see what happens. I mean the numbers may be a lil skewed, but it could be a relative comparison.

what was the a:f?? mid 13's?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Used2beAb16 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know most people say that dynapacks tend to read high, and they do (hub hp), and recently ive seen jeff post that his dynapack reads low. I have a hard time believing this to a point simply because i havent seen it before. (doesnt mean its not true)

I know with mustangs and dyno dynamics and brake dynos you enter certain parameters and can controll the output of the dyno.

Isnt there something like the ramp time or something like that you can change on a dynapack that can affect output??

Either way, these numbers look right on par w/ a dynojet to me. So either way good #'s. Why dont u prove it to everyone and make a pass on a dynojet and see what happens. I mean the numbers may be a lil skewed, but it could be a relative comparison.

what was the a:f?? mid 13's?</TD></TR></TABLE>

jeff's made comparisions and proved it in many of his posts...do a search

 

think the air fuel was 13.2 if i rember right. its in that range