Turbo D16 Dyno
Finally got everything up an running a couple weeks ago...


D16Y8
Z6 head- Crower springs, retainers, turbo cam, Y8 manifold
Wiseco pistons, Eagle rods, compression is a little less than 9:1
Revhard manifold, 54trim SC32 w/.63 exhaust, 3" Turboback
Hondata S200 tuned by Dave @ Whipfactory
CM stage 4 w/ flywheel
Run was done at around 1.2 bar and timing was conservative.

more pics of the car @ https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1024847
To the WF


D16Y8
Z6 head- Crower springs, retainers, turbo cam, Y8 manifold
Wiseco pistons, Eagle rods, compression is a little less than 9:1
Revhard manifold, 54trim SC32 w/.63 exhaust, 3" Turboback
Hondata S200 tuned by Dave @ Whipfactory
CM stage 4 w/ flywheel
Run was done at around 1.2 bar and timing was conservative.

more pics of the car @ https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1024847
To the WF
Trending Topics
looks like the low end is kinda boring but damn i but its fun when that turbo gets spoolin. nice numbers, nice build, and nice paint. i love how the paint looks in your garage with the orangish lighting. dark red looks real good.
Thanks for the compliments.
The tune was made on 93 octane. And I want to switch to a .48 exhaust next spring because the gearing sucks so bad.
The tune was made on 93 octane. And I want to switch to a .48 exhaust next spring because the gearing sucks so bad.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yellowturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sorry about this question but 1.2 bar = ?? PSI ...</TD></TR></TABLE>
1bar = 14.7 psi so he's approximately 17.5psi....sooo 17~18psi
1bar = 14.7 psi so he's approximately 17.5psi....sooo 17~18psi
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yellowturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is it me.... I find those numbers low... Well at 17 psi ELspool is putting 300 whp with a SC50 50 trim .63 ar.
With your turbo you should see more than this I think ?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was thinking the same thing but I would by no means be pissed. I bet it is a blast to drive. I am sure Dave tuned it conservative for longer life. I know I would.
Great job boltz and I to love the color!
Sorry if this was mentioned but I assume Dynojet?
I should stop up there at the shop next weekend when I visit my in-laws in Naperville.
With your turbo you should see more than this I think ?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was thinking the same thing but I would by no means be pissed. I bet it is a blast to drive. I am sure Dave tuned it conservative for longer life. I know I would.
Great job boltz and I to love the color!
Sorry if this was mentioned but I assume Dynojet?
I should stop up there at the shop next weekend when I visit my in-laws in Naperville.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yellowturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Is it me.... I find those numbers low... Well at 17 psi ELspool is putting 300 whp with a SC50 50 trim .63 ar.
With your turbo you should see more than this I think ?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Like posted before timing was conservative I think 18 degrees at peak torque. I also agree that compared to many others (hp vs psi) I am a little low. Its pretty fun to drive but it lags a lot between gears which is gay.
ELSpool, I never knew you had an sc50, I have the 54 trim and that may be a reason why we had such a big fight about .48 and .63 exhausts
Either way my lag is bad and needs to be fixed. I believe swithcing to a .48 exhaust would be cheaper than buying a 50trim with a .48
With your turbo you should see more than this I think ?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Like posted before timing was conservative I think 18 degrees at peak torque. I also agree that compared to many others (hp vs psi) I am a little low. Its pretty fun to drive but it lags a lot between gears which is gay.
ELSpool, I never knew you had an sc50, I have the 54 trim and that may be a reason why we had such a big fight about .48 and .63 exhausts
Either way my lag is bad and needs to be fixed. I believe swithcing to a .48 exhaust would be cheaper than buying a 50trim with a .48
lol, ya I run the SC-50 .60/.63. I think your numbers are pretty good. I too have very conservative timing. Only 16 degrees total with a/f's in the 11.5 range, I know the tuner could have put more timing into the motor, but I daily drive/beat it and racing all weekend long for the past 6 months and the motor keeps on pulling hard. IMO, it's not worth braging rights to have high dyno numbers, I'm down for the low ET's and constant beatings on a safe tune thats going to keep my motor happy
Either way, those are killer numbers and I know how the car feels
Either way, those are killer numbers and I know how the car feels
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ELSpool »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I'm down for the low ET's and constant beatings on a safe tune thats going to keep my motor happy
Either way, those are killer numbers and I know how the car feels
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would completely agree. The dyno in my sig I think I was at 21 @12.5 psi but I have to look to make sure.
Either way, those are killer numbers and I know how the car feels
</TD></TR></TABLE>I would completely agree. The dyno in my sig I think I was at 21 @12.5 psi but I have to look to make sure.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanCivic2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good #'s! Get the .48 A/R and just crank the boost up a few more psi.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
My bet is that the 50 trim is just more efficient than the 54 trim for pressure and airflow levels
</TD></TR></TABLE>My bet is that the 50 trim is just more efficient than the 54 trim for pressure and airflow levels
here are a few D series dyno graph comparisons that I just made
Boltz-
4500- 128hp- 148tq
5000- 180hp- 190tq
6000- 235hp- 205tq
6500- 255hp- 205tq
7000- 265hp- 200tq
7400- 275hp- 200tq
275hp from 6900-7400rpm, power drops after 7400 (crower st2 turbo cam)
Yellowturbo-
4500- 100hp- 125tq
5000- 130hp- 140tq
6000- 215hp- 185tq
6600- 250hp-
7000- 265hp- 200tq
7500- 275hp- 200tq
Dyno graph ends @ 7800 still climbing (stock cam)
Some other guy's dyno from TurboD16.com-
4500- 150hp- 175tq
5000- 210hp- 220tq
6000- 260hp- 230tq
6500- 270hp- 220tq
Power starts dropping @ 6700rpm (I would guess stock cam but I don’t know)
Just incase anyone cares
If you guys want to see pictures of the other 2 dynos, ask yellowturbo or go to TurboD16.com and I think its the 3rd highest dyno on their d16 dyno sticky,
Boltz-
4500- 128hp- 148tq
5000- 180hp- 190tq
6000- 235hp- 205tq
6500- 255hp- 205tq
7000- 265hp- 200tq
7400- 275hp- 200tq
275hp from 6900-7400rpm, power drops after 7400 (crower st2 turbo cam)
Yellowturbo-
4500- 100hp- 125tq
5000- 130hp- 140tq
6000- 215hp- 185tq
6600- 250hp-
7000- 265hp- 200tq
7500- 275hp- 200tq
Dyno graph ends @ 7800 still climbing (stock cam)
Some other guy's dyno from TurboD16.com-
4500- 150hp- 175tq
5000- 210hp- 220tq
6000- 260hp- 230tq
6500- 270hp- 220tq
Power starts dropping @ 6700rpm (I would guess stock cam but I don’t know)
Just incase anyone cares
If you guys want to see pictures of the other 2 dynos, ask yellowturbo or go to TurboD16.com and I think its the 3rd highest dyno on their d16 dyno sticky,
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wdwalker
Honda / Acura
60
Aug 23, 2005 08:34 AM
00CIVICSITEIN
Forced Induction
12
Nov 17, 2004 02:24 PM






