question about reverse staggered.
If I have wheels that are 15x8 all around and wrapped in 225/45/15 all around, and slap a 10mm spacer in the front. does that help with understeer and considered reverse staggered?
the car is an EJ1, with buddy club N+, and ST front and rear sways 1" front and 3/4" rear. I was really just curious to know if simply running a lower offset in the front with all other specs being the same is considered reverse stag, was discussing this with a friend earlier.
Stagger is stagger. There is no "reverse".
Considering that the front track is already wider than the rear track on most of our FWD Hondas, running a lower offset up front (what spacers do) isn't introducing a stagger.
It will increase front cornering traction though.
Considering that the front track is already wider than the rear track on most of our FWD Hondas, running a lower offset up front (what spacers do) isn't introducing a stagger.
It will increase front cornering traction though.
I was really just curious to know if simply running a lower offset in the front with all other specs being the same is considered reverse stag, was discussing this with a friend earlier.
There is no such thing as "reverse stagger". It can't be something that doesn't exist.
Trending Topics
Sooo yeah, back from the dead?
Just curious, if you run wider wheels on the front, but space the rears so they appear to be flush/have the same offset to the casual observer, what effect does that have?
Does it cancel the effect brought about by the front biased stagger? (is that a better way of putting it than reversed?)
I cant seem to find out if it is the broader front track that reduces understeer, or the larger contact patch of a wider wheel/tyre up front, or both?
Just curious, if you run wider wheels on the front, but space the rears so they appear to be flush/have the same offset to the casual observer, what effect does that have?
Does it cancel the effect brought about by the front biased stagger? (is that a better way of putting it than reversed?)
I cant seem to find out if it is the broader front track that reduces understeer, or the larger contact patch of a wider wheel/tyre up front, or both?
Both. A wider track reduces weight transfer and consequently increases grip. A wider contact patch increases grip directly.
Both are nice ways to reduce understeer because your are adding to the car's overall grip levels, instead of reducing them (e.g. with a stiffer rear sway bar).
Both are nice ways to reduce understeer because your are adding to the car's overall grip levels, instead of reducing them (e.g. with a stiffer rear sway bar).
A concise answer, helps to sum things up, thanks.
I suppose then that if you were to widen the rear track to balance things looks wise, it would at least partially counteract the advantage of running a wider wheel up front.
There is probably some crazy formula to get the balance just right, but too complex for me to figure out.
Not that it matters too much, driving a grandad car here, not a circuit racer! haha!
I suppose then that if you were to widen the rear track to balance things looks wise, it would at least partially counteract the advantage of running a wider wheel up front.
There is probably some crazy formula to get the balance just right, but too complex for me to figure out.
Not that it matters too much, driving a grandad car here, not a circuit racer! haha!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
V8BWARE
Honda S2000
5
May 15, 2006 05:28 AM
B HATCH
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
26
May 25, 2004 09:13 AM
Steve91
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
12
Jul 22, 2003 04:42 AM




