new engine
04-13-2003, 11:17 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: md
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
new engine
I got a 93 civic hatchback and want to put a new engine in it. What would be quicker in it the b16 92+ or an acura ls engine. I can't seem to find a place that sell ls engine and trans, anyone know?
04-13-2003, 12:30 PM
#2
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Traverse City, MI, USA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: new engine (csm84)
A B16a2 would be faster than an ls. But with the b16a2 (vtec), your looking at spending more money. It would also be a little more reliable, because ls's are normally just pulled out of old, crashed tegs.
04-13-2003, 12:58 PM
#4
Re: (poison)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by poison »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would also go B16. 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Bah... I'd go for the LS motor w/B16 tranny. I've driven all sorts of setups and I like that setup over the straight B16 setup, but that's me
</TD></TR></TABLE>Bah... I'd go for the LS motor w/B16 tranny. I've driven all sorts of setups and I like that setup over the straight B16 setup, but that's me
04-13-2003, 01:01 PM
#5
senior gold member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dont fake, the funk, earf
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Newman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Newman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Bah... I'd go for the LS motor w/B16 tranny. I've driven all sorts of setups and I like that setup over the straight B16 setup, but that's me
</TD></TR></TABLE>Thats what I got LS motor/b16 trans and turbo. It rips.
Bah... I'd go for the LS motor w/B16 tranny. I've driven all sorts of setups and I like that setup over the straight B16 setup, but that's me
</TD></TR></TABLE>Thats what I got LS motor/b16 trans and turbo. It rips.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post