crower camshaft vs skunk2 camshaft vs jun camshaft
02-13-2007, 04:11 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: bonnerdale, arkansas, usa
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
crower camshaft vs skunk2 camshaft vs jun camshaft
planning to get a stage 2 camshaft but not sure of which one to get. does anyone know which one is better or more preferrable for all motor street/strip application? anyone compared it in performance or dynoed any of these? thanks.
02-13-2007, 04:13 PM
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: crower camshaft vs skunk2 camshaft vs jun camshaft (ge_itr)
Jun is more expensive than the others, but every dyno with their cams I've seen has produced great numbers, and great curve.
02-13-2007, 04:58 PM
#4
moderator emeritus
Re: crower camshaft vs skunk2 camshaft vs jun camshaft (vinuneuro)
fo sho, i havent driven on any of those cams before but i got JUN's going into the hybrid. From what i have read, these cams make great power and still allow the motor to idle very well. I've never read about any complaints regarding them being unstreetable or having rough idles.
Trending Topics
02-13-2007, 05:30 PM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southaven, MS
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (LudeFanatic)
I've also read/seen good results for the new Skunk2 Pro Series.. This is what I'll be getting for my build most likely. Defiantly a 
for them.. Same for Jun always a good Cam, if you can find 'em. But Jun only has one cam for the H22, no stages. (Unless they changed in the last 6 months..)
for them.. Same for Jun always a good Cam, if you can find 'em. But Jun only has one cam for the H22, no stages. (Unless they changed in the last 6 months..)
02-13-2007, 06:15 PM
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Single camshafting for now in, N.Y.
Posts: 3,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (snzh22)
i am going with the pro 2's in the summer
juns are also great
crowers are only good for custom grinds ... might go for those
alot cheaper
Modified by alterdcreations at 6:23 AM 2/15/2007
juns are also great
crowers are only good for custom grinds ... might go for those
alot cheaper
Modified by alterdcreations at 6:23 AM 2/15/2007
02-13-2007, 06:17 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: bonnerdale, arkansas, usa
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (MLBZ521)
from what i've heard the skunk2 has rough idle when stopping. it's not really good for traffic. is this true? i know it makes good power though.
02-14-2007, 11:38 AM
#17
moderator emeritus
Re: (ge_itr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ge_itr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so does anyone know if the jun will make more power or the pro 2?</TD></TR></TABLE>
depends on the setup (bore, stroke, compression...etc)
JUN might be better on one setup and the PRO2 might be better on another. You are supposed to build a performance motor around the cams considering they are what determine how much the valve opens and how long it remains open.
depends on the setup (bore, stroke, compression...etc)
JUN might be better on one setup and the PRO2 might be better on another. You are supposed to build a performance motor around the cams considering they are what determine how much the valve opens and how long it remains open.
02-14-2007, 12:36 PM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (98vtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
depends on the setup (bore, stroke, compression...etc)
JUN might be better on one setup and the PRO2 might be better on another. You are supposed to build a performance motor around the cams considering they are what determine how much the valve opens and how long it remains open.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
This isn't said nearly enough.
depends on the setup (bore, stroke, compression...etc)
JUN might be better on one setup and the PRO2 might be better on another. You are supposed to build a performance motor around the cams considering they are what determine how much the valve opens and how long it remains open.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
This isn't said nearly enough.
02-14-2007, 02:20 PM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: bonnerdale, arkansas, usa
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (98vtec)
this is my setup up. h22. 89mm bore. 95mm stroke. 12.0:1 cr. port/polish. angle valve job. standard size valves. dual springs. tit retainers. port match IM.
skunk2 s2 or pro2 or jun camshaft? planning to get skunk2 sprockets.
skunk2 s2 or pro2 or jun camshaft? planning to get skunk2 sprockets.
02-14-2007, 08:08 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Biloxi, MS, USA
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (98vtec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">imo, thats because most people could careless how an engine works and dont really care to learn. They just wanna go faster. </TD></TR></TABLE>
FASTER! Here here.
I like the price and performance of the skunk2 pro series. I'm probably going with those.
FASTER! Here here.
I like the price and performance of the skunk2 pro series. I'm probably going with those.
02-14-2007, 10:28 PM
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: FL, us
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (1GPlusSH)
none of these are just "drop in" cams; the rest of the head & valvetrain needs similar upgrading. they both sell a package.
but the JUN has By far the best idle to high lobe lift out of the choices.
but the JUN has By far the best idle to high lobe lift out of the choices.
02-14-2007, 10:32 PM
#24
Re: (P13_mein)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by P13_mein »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">none of these are just "drop in" cams; the rest of the head & valvetrain needs similar upgrading. they both sell a package.
but the JUN has By far the best idle to high lobe lift out of the choices.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
best is a pretty subjective word, you care to explain yourself?
but the JUN has By far the best idle to high lobe lift out of the choices.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
best is a pretty subjective word, you care to explain yourself?
02-15-2007, 07:28 PM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: FL, us
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mgags7)
"Best" operates with one subject in relation to others which it being compared. 
in terms of smoothness of the idle and low end characteristics relative to performance increase of the high lobe.
some may prefer an extreme lift and sacrifice it for a rough idle, thus, this would not apply.
in terms of smoothness of the idle and low end characteristics relative to performance increase of the high lobe.
some may prefer an extreme lift and sacrifice it for a rough idle, thus, this would not apply.