skunk2 coilovers: which are front and rear?
01-08-2004, 06:43 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena, Md, USA
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
skunk2 coilovers: which are front and rear?
i have an integra but since i got skunk2 coilovers with civic rates i figured i should ask here. 2 of the springs say 0700.2.50.006 and the other 2 say 0700.2.50.008 which are the fronts and which are the rears. need to know by tomorrow for install. tia
01-08-2004, 08:24 PM
#4
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: arlington, tx, US
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: skunk2 coilovers: which are front and rear? (AirWaveGT)
the bigger heavier springs go in the front thats where all the weight is
Modified by jdmb16si at 11:34 PM 1/8/2004
Modified by jdmb16si at 11:34 PM 1/8/2004
01-08-2004, 08:26 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: skunk2 coilovers: which are front and rear? (jdmb16si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmb16si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the bigger heavier springs go in the front</TD></TR></TABLE>
I think these would be it. 0700.2.50.008
I think these would be it. 0700.2.50.008
01-08-2004, 08:43 PM
#6
Future Texas Boy
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: SoCal Redneck
Posts: 18,889
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: skunk2 coilovers: which are front and rear? (Andres-eh2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Andres-eh2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think these would be it. 0700.2.50.008</TD></TR></TABLE>
7" tall
2.5" inner diameter
800lbs
I think these would be it. 0700.2.50.008</TD></TR></TABLE>
7" tall
2.5" inner diameter
800lbs
01-08-2004, 08:46 PM
#7
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena, Md, USA
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Andres-eh2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Andres-eh2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why civic rates for a teg??? those numbers you posted arent rates</TD></TR></TABLE>
i dont know the rates so i posted what was written on the springs. also i got the civic rates because they are lower than integras so the ride wont be quite as harsh.
i dont know the rates so i posted what was written on the springs. also i got the civic rates because they are lower than integras so the ride wont be quite as harsh.
Trending Topics
01-08-2004, 09:33 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: West San Jose, Ca, USA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Jonas99)
please put the bigger thicker ones in the front my sis bought her car with skunk 2 coilovers installed improperly and ride was very hard .i took those out and sold em replaced with gc 
01-08-2004, 10:40 PM
#10
New User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, Ca, US
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Jonas99)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by You Dumb ***** »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">008 = 800 lb/in - front
006 = 600 lb/in - rear
</TD></TR></TABLE>
008 = 447LB NOT 800.
006 = 335LB.
skunks goes by kg/mm i dont know how you guys got 800 and 600.
anyways some use higher spring rate in the rear, personally i know they dont know anything
about wheel rate. i use the heavier spring up front. maybe you should do the same.
006 = 600 lb/in - rear
</TD></TR></TABLE>
008 = 447LB NOT 800.
006 = 335LB.
skunks goes by kg/mm i dont know how you guys got 800 and 600.
anyways some use higher spring rate in the rear, personally i know they dont know anything
about wheel rate. i use the heavier spring up front. maybe you should do the same.
01-10-2004, 01:09 AM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Mr. Choi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr. Choi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
008 = 447LB NOT 800.
006 = 335LB.
skunks goes by kg/mm i dont know how you guys got 800 and 600.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah you're right man, sorry, your numbers make more sense. the orientation was right still
where did they get those numbers from then?
008 = 447LB NOT 800.
006 = 335LB.
skunks goes by kg/mm i dont know how you guys got 800 and 600.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah you're right man, sorry, your numbers make more sense. the orientation was right still
where did they get those numbers from then?
01-10-2004, 11:54 PM
#13
New User
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Jose, Ca, US
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Jonas99)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jonas99 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yeah you're right man, sorry, your numbers make more sense. the orientation was right still
where did they get those numbers from then?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i dont know, they're a bunch of dumb **** ricers.
i know a jonas that lives right next to me btw.
yeah you're right man, sorry, your numbers make more sense. the orientation was right still
where did they get those numbers from then?</TD></TR></TABLE>
i dont know, they're a bunch of dumb **** ricers.
i know a jonas that lives right next to me btw.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eluam
Suspension & Brakes
2
12-24-2007 05:22 PM
penguinman717
Suspension & Brakes
7
03-24-2005 11:34 AM
