i just barely learned to drive stick.how do i peel out?how does it help wen u race?wats downshifting?how does it help?how do i learn? thanks!

i just barely learned to drive stick.how do i peel out?how does it help wen u race?wats downshifting?how does it help?how do i learn? thanks!

i just barely learned to drive stick.how do i peel out?how does it help wen u race?wats downshifting?how does it help?how do i learn? thanks!

OK,

let's see. Where do I start......

SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick thinks that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Unfortunately for it, it's wrong. Instead of focusing on why it should get a life and stay out of mine, I would like to remind people that its reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only pouty answers, nerdy resolutions to conflicts. When SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick was first found trying to hijack the word "superserviceableness" and use it to quote me out of context, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick is planning to violate the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship, I'm terrified.

I am offended by the way SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick talks down to me. Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions. I would like to put forth the possibility that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to corrupt our youth. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's mercenaries. The truth is that people should just treat each other with decency and respect. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's disorganized, recalcitrant "compromises". Given SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that I challenge SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick to point out any text in this letter that proposes that it should cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility because "it's the right thing to do". It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.

SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's credos have no place in a free, humane society of individual value, individual choice, and individual responsibility. But that's not all: Its memoranda are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition." Funny, that was the same term that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's yes-men once used to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. I must point out that in a recent essay, SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick stated that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Since the arguments it made in the rest of its essay are based in part on that assumption, it should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but in public, it vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, it never fails to give cuckoo tax cheats far more credibility than they deserve. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. To a lesser degree and on a smaller scale, it is far too easy for SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick to use fear, intimidation, sedating substances, and other tools to convince self-centered beatniks to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that if I recall correctly, I would never take a job working for SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick. Given its witless perorations, who would want to? If you want a better opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. I would like to register my strong objection to SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's criticisms. But even if we disregard all that and examine only SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's moonstruck histrionics, this seems to me to be enough to show that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick is too incomprehensible to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its advocates believe that it is bookish to question its opinions. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to give it a rhadamanthine warning not to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence.

If you ask SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick if it's true that even its most footling allies are trained in the use of force, deadly force, advanced weaponry, and offensive and defensive tactics, you'll just get a lot of foot-shuffling and downcast eyes in response. Certainly, I can guarantee the readers of this letter that if anything, SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick says that its analects prevent smallpox. What it means by this, of course, is that it wants free reign to manipulate everything and everybody. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick appears to have found a new tool to use to help it conduct business in an ornery, unprofessional way. That tool is colonialism, and if you watch it wield it, you'll indeed see why I wonder if it really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that it will operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and conniving racialism because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses garrulous psychopaths with sententious and uncontrollable rage. Now, lest you jump to the conclusion that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones, I assure you that we now know for certain that its disciples intend to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. If you doubt this, just ask around.

There are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick has tried to insist that our society be infested with propagandism, interdenominationalism, cannibalism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". The other is whether or not someone once said to me, "I was appalled when I first learned that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's acolytes want to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have no idea why SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick makes such a big fuss over hooliganism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I shall return to this point in particular. That's clear. But we should focus on what unites rather than divides us. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Did it ever occur to SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick that it has a hair-trigger temper? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. When you get right down to it, if my memory serves me correctly, it may seem excessive to note that factionalism is correctly defined by its corrupt style, structure, and methods, not by its stated or apparent ideological premises or goals. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with out-of-touch scalawags on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to manipulate public understanding of boosterism. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick wants nothing less than to consign most of us to the role of its servants or slaves. Its apostles then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with mendacious, silly spoilsports who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make libidinous thugs seem ready for sainthood, in comparison. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind? To rephrase that question, whatever happened to community standards? The answer is obvious if you understand that it and its drones are combative individuals. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. In closing this letter, let me point out that I would be remiss if I didn't remind you that autism is sustained by rigid ideological categories.

i just barely learned to drive stick.how do i peel out?how does it help wen u race?wats downshifting?how does it help?how do i learn? thanks!

OK,

let's see. Where do I start......

SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick thinks that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Unfortunately for it, it's wrong. Instead of focusing on why it should get a life and stay out of mine, I would like to remind people that its reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only pouty answers, nerdy resolutions to conflicts. When SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick was first found trying to hijack the word "superserviceableness" and use it to quote me out of context, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick is planning to violate the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship, I'm terrified.

I am offended by the way SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick talks down to me. Some people might object to that claim, and if they do, my response is: It's irrelevant that my allegations are 100% true. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick distrusts my information and arguments and will forever maintain its current opinions. I would like to put forth the possibility that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick claims to have turned over a new leaf shortly after getting caught trying to corrupt our youth. This claim is an outright lie that is still being circulated by SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's mercenaries. The truth is that people should just treat each other with decency and respect. But let's not lose sight of the larger, more important issue here: SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's disorganized, recalcitrant "compromises". Given SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's propensity for repression in the service of paradigmatic integrity, it is little wonder that I challenge SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick to point out any text in this letter that proposes that it should cultivate the purest breed of irresponsibility because "it's the right thing to do". It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.

SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's credos have no place in a free, humane society of individual value, individual choice, and individual responsibility. But that's not all: Its memoranda are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition." Funny, that was the same term that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's yes-men once used to undermine the individualistic underpinnings of traditional jurisprudence. I must point out that in a recent essay, SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick stated that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Since the arguments it made in the rest of its essay are based in part on that assumption, it should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but in public, it vehemently inveighs against corruption and sin. But when nobody's looking, it never fails to give cuckoo tax cheats far more credibility than they deserve. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick expresses insufficient concern about the ozone layer, the Bhopal tragedy, and lesbian theater. To a lesser degree and on a smaller scale, it is far too easy for SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick to use fear, intimidation, sedating substances, and other tools to convince self-centered beatniks to dilute the nation's sense of common purpose and shared sacrifice. Excuse me; that's not entirely correct. What I meant to say is that if I recall correctly, I would never take a job working for SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick. Given its witless perorations, who would want to? If you want a better opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. I would like to register my strong objection to SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's criticisms. But even if we disregard all that and examine only SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's moonstruck histrionics, this seems to me to be enough to show that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick is too incomprehensible to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its advocates believe that it is bookish to question its opinions. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to give it a rhadamanthine warning not to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence.

If you ask SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick if it's true that even its most footling allies are trained in the use of force, deadly force, advanced weaponry, and offensive and defensive tactics, you'll just get a lot of foot-shuffling and downcast eyes in response. Certainly, I can guarantee the readers of this letter that if anything, SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick says that its analects prevent smallpox. What it means by this, of course, is that it wants free reign to manipulate everything and everybody. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick appears to have found a new tool to use to help it conduct business in an ornery, unprofessional way. That tool is colonialism, and if you watch it wield it, you'll indeed see why I wonder if it really believes the things it says. It knows they're not true, doesn't it? I don't pretend to know the answer, but I do know that it will operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and conniving racialism because it possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses garrulous psychopaths with sententious and uncontrollable rage. Now, lest you jump to the conclusion that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones, I assure you that we now know for certain that its disciples intend to shrink the so-called marketplace of ideas down to convenience-store size. If you doubt this, just ask around.

There are two related questions in this matter. The first is to what extent SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick has tried to insist that our society be infested with propagandism, interdenominationalism, cannibalism, and an impressive swarm of other "isms". The other is whether or not someone once said to me, "I was appalled when I first learned that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's acolytes want to conjure up dirt against its fellow human beings." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, have no idea why SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick makes such a big fuss over hooliganism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I shall return to this point in particular. That's clear. But we should focus on what unites rather than divides us. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.) Did it ever occur to SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick that it has a hair-trigger temper? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. When you get right down to it, if my memory serves me correctly, it may seem excessive to note that factionalism is correctly defined by its corrupt style, structure, and methods, not by its stated or apparent ideological premises or goals. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and, in many cases, it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it surely expresses how some of us have an opportunity to come in contact with out-of-touch scalawags on a regular basis at work or in school. We, therefore, may be able to gain some insight into the way they think, into their values; we may be able to understand why they want to manipulate public understanding of boosterism. SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick wants nothing less than to consign most of us to the role of its servants or slaves. Its apostles then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with mendacious, silly spoilsports who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that SiFoeLife who doesn't know how to drive stick's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make libidinous thugs seem ready for sainthood, in comparison. But what, you may ask, does any of that have to do with the theme of this letter, viz., that we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind? To rephrase that question, whatever happened to community standards? The answer is obvious if you understand that it and its drones are combative individuals. This is not set down in complaint against them, but merely as analysis. In closing this letter, let me point out that I would be remiss if I didn't remind you that autism is sustained by rigid ideological categories.

Has anybody even seen the link?

http://hugin.sigusr1.org/~pakin/complaint

So you press the clutch and take the car out of 5th gear and put it in 2nd, now thats downshifting.