My dyno on b-16
01-31-2006, 05:42 PM
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Home, PA
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: My dyno on b-16 (OogalyDoogaly)
the problem was his URL
http://i44.photobucket.com/alb...2.jpg
thats the correct URL, copy and paste that shizzle and enjoy
FYI, his orignal URL was "http://http:/i44.photobucket.com/albums/f3/hotdoggies/dyno2.jpg" note the extra http
http://i44.photobucket.com/alb...2.jpg
thats the correct URL, copy and paste that shizzle and enjoy
FYI, his orignal URL was "http://http:/i44.photobucket.com/albums/f3/hotdoggies/dyno2.jpg" note the extra http
Trending Topics
01-31-2006, 07:26 PM
#13
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Carson, CO, USA
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (96-EJ6 B18C)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96-EJ6 B18C »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice #'s, on a DynoJet???
I bet that EM1 is a blast </TD></TR></TABLE>
fo'sizzzzzle
edit: btw...I was wondering did it cost you anything for them to tune the vafc...I also have one (un-tuned)
I bet that EM1 is a blast
</TD></TR></TABLE>fo'sizzzzzle
edit: btw...I was wondering did it cost you anything for them to tune the vafc...I also have one (un-tuned)
01-31-2006, 09:09 PM
#18
Unceasing Measure
Re: (INCNTRL4)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by INCNTRL4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow thats it? id be expecting more with those mods, I ran 147WHP on my B16 on a mustang dyno, with a CAI and DC Sport 4-2-1; 1 Piece header!</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's a B16 with light cams and a good exhaust set up. There's nothing wrong with those numbers - or that torque curve for that matter
.
Now put a B20 bottom end on it and bump the entirety of the graph up about 20 points
It's a B16 with light cams and a good exhaust set up. There's nothing wrong with those numbers - or that torque curve for that matter
.Now put a B20 bottom end on it and bump the entirety of the graph up about 20 points
01-31-2006, 09:44 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Archidictus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It's a B16 with light cams and a good exhaust set up. There's nothing wrong with those numbers - or that torque curve for that matter.
Now put a B20 bottom end on it and bump the entirety of the graph up about 20 points</TD></TR></TABLE>
Its a B16 with 12:1 compression and cams. Did everyone else seem to miss this?
It's a B16 with light cams and a good exhaust set up. There's nothing wrong with those numbers - or that torque curve for that matter
.Now put a B20 bottom end on it and bump the entirety of the graph up about 20 points
</TD></TR></TABLE>Its a B16 with 12:1 compression and cams. Did everyone else seem to miss this?
01-31-2006, 10:27 PM
#23
Unceasing Measure
Re: (Hybrid93Eg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hybrid93Eg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its a B16 with 12:1 compression and cams. Did everyone else seem to miss this?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Where does it say 12 : 1 compression? Is that the static CR of CTR pistons in a USDM B16? If so, I did not know that.
And in that case, those numbers should be about 10whp higher throughout the entire powerband. Why tune it to 12.5ish when you could easilly do 13.5 on the afr?
Where does it say 12 : 1 compression? Is that the static CR of CTR pistons in a USDM B16? If so, I did not know that.
And in that case, those numbers should be about 10whp higher throughout the entire powerband. Why tune it to 12.5ish when you could easilly do 13.5 on the afr?
