MORE HORSE POWER
02-27-2007, 12:26 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Shaw AFB, sc, usa
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MORE HORSE POWER
I have a JDM B16 and I'm wanting to get about three hundred horses. Without going with boost what combinations would give me about that much?
02-27-2007, 12:39 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a JDM B16 and I'm wanting to get about three hundred horses. Without going with boost what combinations would give me about that much</TD></TR></TABLE>
NAAAWWWWZZZZZ...
Without boost, 300 will be pretty damn tough... People struggle to hit 200whp on NA engines...
NAAAWWWWZZZZZ...
Without boost, 300 will be pretty damn tough... People struggle to hit 200whp on NA engines...
02-27-2007, 12:52 PM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canada, canada
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: MORE HORSE POWER (chriscotten_06)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chriscotten_06 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a JDM B16 and I'm wanting to get about three hundred horses. Without going with boost what combinations would give me about that much?</TD></TR></TABLE>
please slap urself..
please slap urself..
Trending Topics
02-27-2007, 12:56 PM
#9
Risky Business
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trackside with the smoking bee
Posts: 25,211
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
39 Posts
Re: MORE HORSE POWER (chriscotten_06)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chriscotten_06 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Without going with boost what combinations would give me about that much?</TD></TR></TABLE>
The combination of your head and a toilet would work well in this case
The combination of your head and a toilet would work well in this case
02-27-2007, 12:58 PM
#11
Ek Forever y0!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beating people with a stick, GA
Posts: 16,712
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Re: (pdiggitydogg)
It would cost like
6 billion dollars to make a b16 do that.
You should call W. Bush and have him raise the States alert to code 3.
6 billion dollars to make a b16 do that.
You should call W. Bush and have him raise the States alert to code 3.
02-27-2007, 01:57 PM
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: 805, CA, US
Posts: 9,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (doood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">300whp na from a b16 is next to impossible. a bored and stroked b18, k20, or h22 would be better candidates.</TD></TR></TABLE>
x2! I mean **** I only made 160whp/110ft/lbs on my B16 and even to get to that point was qite a bit of $$$, granted that was no internal work and a shitty header, but still, never heard of a true b16(not bored or stroked) making more than 220-225whp.
x2! I mean **** I only made 160whp/110ft/lbs on my B16 and even to get to that point was qite a bit of $$$, granted that was no internal work and a shitty header, but still, never heard of a true b16(not bored or stroked) making more than 220-225whp.
02-27-2007, 02:10 PM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (turbociviccoupe)
It's expensive, but not as expensive as some of you are making it out to be.
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA Non-VTEC.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.
Modified by Syndacate at 6:20 PM 2/27/2007
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA Non-VTEC.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.
Modified by Syndacate at 6:20 PM 2/27/2007
02-27-2007, 02:13 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's expensive, but not as expensive as some of you are making it out to be.
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.</TD></TR></TABLE>
comparing this guy to bisimoto is like comparing aids and crabs...totally different.
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.</TD></TR></TABLE>
comparing this guy to bisimoto is like comparing aids and crabs...totally different.
02-27-2007, 02:24 PM
#22
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SlowCivic29)
If I'm in your spot. Nitrous will be my best friend if not boosting. I ran it with my stock D16A6 CRX 125 shot best competition was a 05 Mustang Bullitt, won by a fender. Stock 97 Civic 100 shot beat Mustand 5.0 Fox body, 97 cobra, Z28s. 97 stock Lude 100 shot, beat supercharged 97 mustang cobra, 90% V8s in the street. Hope that gives some idea. Good Luck!
02-27-2007, 02:24 PM
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (turbociviccoupe)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbociviccoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
comparing this guy to bisimoto is like comparing aids and crabs...totally different.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, I thought about that after I posted, but the point remains sound, I wouldn't say it costs 8 million dollars as one guy suggested, and I sure as hell wouldn't say it's impossible. Though it would obviously be A LOT cheaper to go their by forced induction.
If he doesn't want turbo lag go for a TT setup or a supercharger...but NA on a 4 banger is stupid for street unless you're in a situation like bisimoto is.
comparing this guy to bisimoto is like comparing aids and crabs...totally different.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, I thought about that after I posted, but the point remains sound, I wouldn't say it costs 8 million dollars as one guy suggested, and I sure as hell wouldn't say it's impossible. Though it would obviously be A LOT cheaper to go their by forced induction.
If he doesn't want turbo lag go for a TT setup or a supercharger...but NA on a 4 banger is stupid for street unless you're in a situation like bisimoto is.
02-27-2007, 02:25 PM
#24
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's expensive, but not as expensive as some of you are making it out to be.
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA Non-VTEC.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.
Modified by Syndacate at 6:20 PM 2/27/2007</TD></TR></TABLE>
bisi has the advantage of running his own shop with a dyno where he can see what works and what doesnt, not to mention he's one smart SOB. his sohc also has a displacement advantage over a b16.
****, bisimoto's running 9's on his SOHC NA Non-VTEC.
I wouldn't say "300 whp is impossible."
Though boost would OBVIOUSLY be the better choice. by FAR.
Modified by Syndacate at 6:20 PM 2/27/2007</TD></TR></TABLE>
bisi has the advantage of running his own shop with a dyno where he can see what works and what doesnt, not to mention he's one smart SOB. his sohc also has a displacement advantage over a b16.
02-27-2007, 02:26 PM
#25
Re: (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If he doesn't want turbo lag go for a TT setup or a supercharger...but NA on a 4 banger is stupid for street unless you're in a situation like bisimoto is.</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you seriously recommending TT's for a honda 4 cylinder?
are you seriously recommending TT's for a honda 4 cylinder?