.Hookedonhatch.

*** Do Not tell me no bar or the best bar is no bar or any other gay ****, I want to tighten up the rear of my hatch and got alot of suspension stuff coming sooo. Which from experience is best bang or buck. The EM auto X package is is $385 and the Miracle is $450. Does anyone know which design is better and which (if any) is more functional or are they both pretty much the same concept and serve the same purpose. Thanks for input

cxSHOE

you wont be traveling fast enough that you really need it, but heres em's logic on its product.

http://evasivemotorsports.com/em_formula.html

i havent seen any notation on next and their bars so that means theirs doesnt work. resale value will be held much more with the next bars although.


i use a mugen upper with mugen sway, and its tight enough for me.

goodluck.

Eran

iTrader: (1)

I'd rather have EMRacing bars .... they cost less and are more "street" friendly.

The Miracle does have hella bling tho.

HiProfile

If you really want to stiffen it up (not doing it because they're baller), get some thick-wall round chromoly tubing, then get a mini-cage welded up with big gussets at each joint. Then stich-weld the chassis & subframe connectors. I really don't knwo why nobody does subframe connectors, I have a simple pair on my 67 firebird convertable (subframe car that naturally has lots of flex) and its night & day.

.Hookedonhatch.

Thanks for your input. Yeah im not really worried too much about bling blang, i just want to tighten up the *** so i gets rid of the creaking and stuff like that. I like the em concept alot more but the next looks alot more burly.

blackhope121

you should think about getting an autopower roll bar.. The difference in the rear was night and day..

Whith the em bars the difference is like 5pm and 6 pm.