Ls/Vtec vs poor man's type r
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ls/Vtec vs poor man's type r
I'm basically wondering what do you guys think is better for a reliable dailydriver/fast car. I'm planning to go all motor here. I don't really kno how much about these just that ls/vtec consists of b18b1 block with b16 head and poor man's type r consist of b18c1 block and b16 head with type r internals. I just wanted to see your guys' opinion on these two motors.
#3
Re: Ls/Vtec vs poor man's type r (93ejay1)
heres their setup-
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks
#4
Re: Ls/Vtec vs poor man's type r (volc0m08)
def poor man's r - oil squirters
the only benefit of th ls/vtec is the slightly longer stroke... i'd def take the reliability of the gsr block over that anyday.
the only benefit of th ls/vtec is the slightly longer stroke... i'd def take the reliability of the gsr block over that anyday.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: GA
Posts: 3,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Lee_Delso)
wait why would you put a B16 head onto a GSR block with stock internals? wouldnt the compression drop? as fasr as i now the combution chambers on the P72 head are tigher and causing slightly higher compression with the P72 pistons in the B18c1 block
maybe im just wrong lol
maybe im just wrong lol
#10
sifu pai mei
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nova, USA
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Lee_Delso)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lee_Delso »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Gotta say poorman's type R hands down cause I'm building one right now. </TD></TR></TABLE>
same here
same here
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Solo
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Nextelbuddy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nextelbuddy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wait why would you put a B16 head onto a GSR block with stock internals? wouldnt the compression drop? as fasr as i now the combution chambers on the P72 head are tigher and causing slightly higher compression with the P72 pistons in the B18c1 block
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
interesting. i'd like to know this as well.
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
interesting. i'd like to know this as well.
#12
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Damn EA6Bs, Washington
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Nextelbuddy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nextelbuddy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wait why would you put a B16 head onto a GSR block with stock internals? wouldnt the compression drop? as fasr as i now the combution chambers on the P72 head are tigher and causing slightly higher compression with the P72 pistons in the B18c1 block
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
ur right, a b16 or itr head on a gsr block is lower compression than a gsr head on a gsr block.
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
ur right, a b16 or itr head on a gsr block is lower compression than a gsr head on a gsr block.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Up north, usa
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Nextelbuddy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Nextelbuddy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wait why would you put a B16 head onto a GSR block with stock internals? wouldnt the compression drop? as fasr as i now the combution chambers on the P72 head are tigher and causing slightly higher compression with the P72 pistons in the B18c1 block
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
you are correct sir, that's why uo would have to replace the p72 pistons with the itr ones or wlse the ctr pistons. What I did was replaced the p72 with some itr pistons and that should raise the com back up.
maybe im just wrong lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
you are correct sir, that's why uo would have to replace the p72 pistons with the itr ones or wlse the ctr pistons. What I did was replaced the p72 with some itr pistons and that should raise the com back up.
#19
B A N N E D
Join Date: May 2004
Location: DETROIT DA DIRTY D, MI, US
Posts: 6,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love to hear people say ls-v isnt reliable. Of course it wont be reliable when some kid does a half as build and wants to rev to 10 k daily
b20 vtec imo
b20 vtec imo
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Architect in training
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Ls/Vtec vs poor man's type r (93ejay1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93ejay1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">heres their setup-
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks</TD></TR></TABLE>
Holy crap, i definitely want one now.
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks</TD></TR></TABLE>
Holy crap, i definitely want one now.
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
5 Posts
Re: (t0ekn3e)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93ejay1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">heres their setup-
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm just wondering - what's the rest of their setups, ie shell, gutted/street car, other mods? The guy who does most of the swaps & trannies around here has an eg with built ls/vtec - he hit 12.9 with a pinch of 50shot in 3rd, usually low 13's w/o.
If you do it right, almost anything can be reliable. Same for if you treat it right. I doubt a poor man's type r could be bounced off a 10k redline in ever gear ever day as a daily driver. It might last a tad longer, only because of the piston speed, the rod strength, and oil squirters. Forged pistons diminish the need for squirters and can be coated if you really want to go all-out.
For the price and a heavy car, [LS or CR-V]/Vtec, for a car with lots of supporting mods, PM's Type-R. There's just something about vtec pulling all the way past the stock tach's upper limit...
-gsr block, b16 head with itr valvetrain and itr tranny. -13.2 on azenis
-gsr block, b16 head, b16 tranny. -13.5 on slicks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm just wondering - what's the rest of their setups, ie shell, gutted/street car, other mods? The guy who does most of the swaps & trannies around here has an eg with built ls/vtec - he hit 12.9 with a pinch of 50shot in 3rd, usually low 13's w/o.
If you do it right, almost anything can be reliable. Same for if you treat it right. I doubt a poor man's type r could be bounced off a 10k redline in ever gear ever day as a daily driver. It might last a tad longer, only because of the piston speed, the rod strength, and oil squirters. Forged pistons diminish the need for squirters and can be coated if you really want to go all-out.
For the price and a heavy car, [LS or CR-V]/Vtec, for a car with lots of supporting mods, PM's Type-R. There's just something about vtec pulling all the way past the stock tach's upper limit...
#25
Re: (HiProfile)
why not use the LS crank and rods. in the gsr block? get the rods milled down and get some ctr pistons. and get tuned. Did a simular setup 7.7@ on slicks 1/8mile. daily driver
Chris
Chris