Del Sol Pro's and Con's The official end all thread.
06-10-2005, 10:03 AM
#26
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mike1114)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike1114 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nobody ever mentioned one of the biggest downsides..
They are heavy as **** for their size!!! All that underbracing cause of removable roof.
They also are rather low to the ground to begin with, they can be lowered but its tuff driving...</TD></TR></TABLE>
i didnt think so... only like 2300-2500 i thought... the crx is like 2100-2300 or do i have my info wrong???
i love a rough ride... im usto big jacked up trucks... lol
They are heavy as **** for their size!!! All that underbracing cause of removable roof.
They also are rather low to the ground to begin with, they can be lowered but its tuff driving...</TD></TR></TABLE>
i didnt think so... only like 2300-2500 i thought... the crx is like 2100-2300 or do i have my info wrong???
i love a rough ride... im usto big jacked up trucks... lol
06-10-2005, 10:11 AM
#27
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: I drink Seafoam and poo into catch cans, USA
Posts: 3,215
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: (1SiKDA8)
Exactly, thats heavy.
when my hach barely weighs over 2100lbs with B motor and complete turbo setup. (car has full interior too) a del sol is pretty damn heavy.
when my hach barely weighs over 2100lbs with B motor and complete turbo setup. (car has full interior too) a del sol is pretty damn heavy.
06-10-2005, 10:14 AM
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mike1114)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike1114 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Exactly, thats heavy.
when my hach barely weighs over 2100lbs with B motor and complete turbo setup. (car has full interior too) a del sol is pretty damn heavy.</TD></TR></TABLE>
really... i didn't think that was too bad... mmm... ok.. im off to do more research....
also.. maybe you guys can clear this up for me.. ive been looking at sum for sale and they have have leather.. now i didn't think that any of them came w that option... am i wrong or are these just re-wrapped seats im looking at???
when my hach barely weighs over 2100lbs with B motor and complete turbo setup. (car has full interior too) a del sol is pretty damn heavy.</TD></TR></TABLE>
really... i didn't think that was too bad... mmm... ok.. im off to do more research....
also.. maybe you guys can clear this up for me.. ive been looking at sum for sale and they have have leather.. now i didn't think that any of them came w that option... am i wrong or are these just re-wrapped seats im looking at???
06-10-2005, 10:19 AM
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ricey McRicerton)
ok.. take a peek at these... are they genuine leather???
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...&rd=1
pics at way bottom....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...&rd=1
pics at way bottom....
06-10-2005, 10:21 AM
#31
Member
Re: (1SiKDA8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1SiKDA8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i didnt think so... only like 2300-2500 i thought... the crx is like 2100-2300 or do i have my info wrong???
i love a rough ride... im usto big jacked up trucks... lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
depends on the model. the b16 sols are the heaviest. my 93 's' with H swap is 2450 with my 185 lbs *** in it. That's 2265 for the car, 1/4 tank of gas, full interior (nothing removed, not even spare tire), and a bunch of tools and random **** in the rear compartments/behind seats. It is a rough ride, but not noticably different than my friend's eg with similar suspension.
edit* forgot to mention that i lost ac, and a lot of other unnecessary crap in the swap.
Modified by IHateJDM at 1:48 PM 6/10/2005
i didnt think so... only like 2300-2500 i thought... the crx is like 2100-2300 or do i have my info wrong???
i love a rough ride... im usto big jacked up trucks... lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
depends on the model. the b16 sols are the heaviest. my 93 's' with H swap is 2450 with my 185 lbs *** in it. That's 2265 for the car, 1/4 tank of gas, full interior (nothing removed, not even spare tire), and a bunch of tools and random **** in the rear compartments/behind seats. It is a rough ride, but not noticably different than my friend's eg with similar suspension.
edit* forgot to mention that i lost ac, and a lot of other unnecessary crap in the swap.
Modified by IHateJDM at 1:48 PM 6/10/2005
06-10-2005, 10:27 AM
#32
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (1SiKDA8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1SiKDA8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok.. take a peek at these... are they genuine leather???
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...&rd=1
pics at way bottom....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope.
EDIT: I should say that they're not genuine Honda leather Del Sol seats.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...&rd=1
pics at way bottom....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope.
EDIT: I should say that they're not genuine Honda leather Del Sol seats.
06-10-2005, 10:29 AM
#34
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (IHateJDM)
well at least you have VTEC...
and mine shud be lighter than that.. hopefully... unless i gain like 80lbs... lol
is that w stock rims??
BTW.. what is the weight of the stock rims.. round-about #
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Nope. </TD></TR></TABLE>
so thoes are wrapped???
06-10-2005, 11:05 AM
#37
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Turbo city, Fl, USA
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mike1114)
My 94 del sol si was only 2450lbs. w/ h22 and full interior and a system in it. I don't think that is really that heavy. Also, my car was very low, and I had no problems with its driveability or handling.
06-10-2005, 11:43 AM
#38
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: racine, Wi, usa
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mike1114)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike1114 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nobody ever mentioned one of the biggest downsides..
They are heavy as **** for their size!!! All that underbracing cause of removable roof.
They also are rather low to the ground to begin with, they can be lowered but its tuff driving...</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont think there much heavier then any other civic, you have to remember there smaller too which helps keep the weight down.
Secondly I dropped my car 2" when I got it from stock and it hardly looks lowered it looks like it was sapossed to come that way. Also I dont find them being lower harder to drive in the least. I drive mine year round lowered and have yet to get it stuck in the snow ect. it sits about 3" off the ground I want to say, from fram to ground (Not lowest point btw but the side of the body)
They are heavy as **** for their size!!! All that underbracing cause of removable roof.
They also are rather low to the ground to begin with, they can be lowered but its tuff driving...</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont think there much heavier then any other civic, you have to remember there smaller too which helps keep the weight down.
Secondly I dropped my car 2" when I got it from stock and it hardly looks lowered it looks like it was sapossed to come that way. Also I dont find them being lower harder to drive in the least. I drive mine year round lowered and have yet to get it stuck in the snow ect. it sits about 3" off the ground I want to say, from fram to ground (Not lowest point btw but the side of the body)
06-10-2005, 11:44 AM
#39
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los AngeLes, Ca
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (nocturnaldragon)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nocturnaldragon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I dont think there much heavier then any other civic, you have to remember there smaller too which helps keep the weight down.
Secondly I dropped my car 2" when I got it from stock and it hardly looks lowered it looks like it was sapossed to come that way. Also I dont find them being lower harder to drive in the least. I drive mine year round lowered and have yet to get it stuck in the snow ect. it sits about 3" off the ground I want to say, from fram to ground (Not lowest point btw but the side of the body)</TD></TR></TABLE>
i want to see what i'm looking at. pictures?
I dont think there much heavier then any other civic, you have to remember there smaller too which helps keep the weight down.
Secondly I dropped my car 2" when I got it from stock and it hardly looks lowered it looks like it was sapossed to come that way. Also I dont find them being lower harder to drive in the least. I drive mine year round lowered and have yet to get it stuck in the snow ect. it sits about 3" off the ground I want to say, from fram to ground (Not lowest point btw but the side of the body)</TD></TR></TABLE>
i want to see what i'm looking at. pictures?
06-10-2005, 11:48 AM
#40
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: racine, Wi, usa
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (idriveadelsol7)
I went to this page. If you have a better or more accurate one please share with me and Ill edit the top. I want to make this the most accurate I can and have as much info in the first post (mine) as I can so people dont have to read the entire thread because most people here are to lazy and just wont do it when they can make a anther post asking because they cant take the time to read.
http://www.clubcivic.com/board/civic-specs.php
http://www.clubcivic.com/board/civic-specs.php
06-10-2005, 11:51 AM
#41
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (nocturnaldragon)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nocturnaldragon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
http://www.clubcivic.com/board/civic-specs.php</TD></TR></TABLE>
awesome!!! thanks!!!
http://www.clubcivic.com/board/civic-specs.php</TD></TR></TABLE>
awesome!!! thanks!!!
06-10-2005, 12:56 PM
#43
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (idriveadelsol7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by idriveadelsol7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">know of any del sol websites? particularly info on the h22a swapped into a del sol.</TD></TR></TABLE>
ya might wanna ask teknics1, he did the swap..
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=878010 this thread has sum great info!!
ya might wanna ask teknics1, he did the swap..
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=878010 this thread has sum great info!!
06-11-2005, 12:46 AM
#44
Re: (1SiKDA8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nocturnaldragon »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Some commonly asked questions & information:
Fog lights came on the 93-95 models only, 96-97 didn't have them
Modified by nocturnaldragon at 2:45 PM 6/10/2005</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are not fog lights, they are aux lights. Aux and fogs are two totally different things.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1SiKDA8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
really... i didn't think that was too bad... mmm... ok.. im off to do more research....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The weight debate has been around forever. If I remember correctly, the Sol is lighter than a teg. Plus, you can always lighten the car if you want to.
Some commonly asked questions & information:
Fog lights came on the 93-95 models only, 96-97 didn't have them
Modified by nocturnaldragon at 2:45 PM 6/10/2005</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are not fog lights, they are aux lights. Aux and fogs are two totally different things.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1SiKDA8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
really... i didn't think that was too bad... mmm... ok.. im off to do more research....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The weight debate has been around forever. If I remember correctly, the Sol is lighter than a teg. Plus, you can always lighten the car if you want to.
06-11-2005, 09:01 AM
#46
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Blame Miko. Athens Greece
Posts: 7,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (dohcdelsol93)
a couple of things that were forgotten...
NOTES
1) it's a targa, obviously it's going to be heavier.
2) because it's a targa (open top) it's a car to have fun in, not race.
3) EDM models always had the aux. lights
PROS
1) excellent driving position - everything is within hands reach and close to the steering wheel.
2) extra compartments behind the seats.
3) stereo compartment - good to hide your cdplayer from thieves
CONS
1) below par chassis rigidty - but then again anyone who drives a civic is used to it
NOTES
1) it's a targa, obviously it's going to be heavier.
2) because it's a targa (open top) it's a car to have fun in, not race.
3) EDM models always had the aux. lights
PROS
1) excellent driving position - everything is within hands reach and close to the steering wheel.
2) extra compartments behind the seats.
3) stereo compartment - good to hide your cdplayer from thieves
CONS
1) below par chassis rigidty - but then again anyone who drives a civic is used to it
06-11-2005, 10:05 AM
#47
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: www.rideekulo.us
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (james p.)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1SiKDA8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just found it.... gimme a couple hrs to read it tho.. thanks.. your a great help!!!
well im lookin for VTEC first.. all put my feet through the damn floor boards to stop if i can find a cheep VTEC, brakes are last priority..... VTEC!!!!!!!!! w00t w00t!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
brakes definately should NOT be last priority, unless you want to wreck your new investment. if you do a swap you have more power and weight, more inertia... u need better brakes to compensate for all of that. i hope you change your mind on that decision.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by james p. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">a couple of things that were forgotten...
NOTES
1) it's a targa, obviously it's going to be heavier.
2) because it's a targa (open top) it's a car to have fun in, not race.
3) EDM models always had the aux. lights
PROS
1) excellent driving position - everything is within hands reach and close to the steering wheel.
2) extra compartments behind the seats.
3) stereo compartment - good to hide your cdplayer from thieves
CONS
1) below par chassis rigidty - but then again anyone who drives a civic is used to it </TD></TR></TABLE>
tell these things to david "darksol" http://www.drjanestewart.com/darksol/showcase.html
does take quite a bit to stiffen up the chassis... i loved my Sol though, and the girls love it too
well im lookin for VTEC first.. all put my feet through the damn floor boards to stop if i can find a cheep VTEC, brakes are last priority..... VTEC!!!!!!!!! w00t w00t!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
brakes definately should NOT be last priority, unless you want to wreck your new investment. if you do a swap you have more power and weight, more inertia... u need better brakes to compensate for all of that. i hope you change your mind on that decision.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by james p. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">a couple of things that were forgotten...
NOTES
1) it's a targa, obviously it's going to be heavier.
2) because it's a targa (open top) it's a car to have fun in, not race.
3) EDM models always had the aux. lights
PROS
1) excellent driving position - everything is within hands reach and close to the steering wheel.
2) extra compartments behind the seats.
3) stereo compartment - good to hide your cdplayer from thieves
CONS
1) below par chassis rigidty - but then again anyone who drives a civic is used to it </TD></TR></TABLE>
tell these things to david "darksol" http://www.drjanestewart.com/darksol/showcase.html
does take quite a bit to stiffen up the chassis... i loved my Sol though, and the girls love it too
06-11-2005, 10:57 AM
#48
Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Blame Miko. Athens Greece
Posts: 7,316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (deeksmooth)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by deeksmooth »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">tell these things to david "darksol" http://www.drjanestewart.com/darksol/showcase.html
does take quite a bit to stiffen up the chassis... i loved my Sol though, and the girls love it too </TD></TR></TABLE>
tell david what exactelly? Don't get me wrong you can race a del Sol, but it's not the ideal race car. Once you go against a french hatch (Peugeot, Renault, Citroen) you discover how far behind Honda is with handling.
Brakes and suspension should be the 1st thing to be upgraded before doing any power upgrades.
does take quite a bit to stiffen up the chassis... i loved my Sol though, and the girls love it too
</TD></TR></TABLE>tell david what exactelly? Don't get me wrong you can race a del Sol, but it's not the ideal race car. Once you go against a french hatch (Peugeot, Renault, Citroen) you discover how far behind Honda is with handling.
Brakes and suspension should be the 1st thing to be upgraded before doing any power upgrades.
06-11-2005, 04:23 PM
#49
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (james p.)
Here's a link for weight comparison
http://www.hondaswap.com/forum...29355
and taken from the FAQ thread...
EG 1993 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2275
EG 1993 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2342
EG 1993 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2319
EG 1993 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2388
EG 1993 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2520
EG 1993 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2564
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1994 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2529
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2703
EG 1994 Honda del Sol S MT 2301
EG 1994 Honda del Sol S AT 2387
EG 1994 Honda del Sol Si MT 2414
EG 1994 Honda del Sol Si AT 2474
EG 1994 Honda del Sol VTEC MT 2491
1994 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2108
1994 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2178
1994 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2264
1994 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2390
1994 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1994 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2231
1994 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2326
1994 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2443
1994 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2502
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1994 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2745
EG 1994 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2313
EG 1994 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2392
EG 1994 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2403
EG 1994 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2456
EG 1994 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2522
EG 1994 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2575
DC 1995 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1995 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2529
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Coupe MT 2643
DC 1995 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2738
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Sedan MT 2703
EG 1995 Honda del Sol S MT 2295
EG 1995 Honda del Sol S AT 2387
EG 1995 Honda del Sol Si MT 2414
EG 1995 Honda del Sol Si AT 2474
EG 1995 Honda del Sol VTEC MT 2522
1995 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2108
1995 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2178
1995 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2264
1995 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2390
1995 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1995 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2231
1995 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2326
1995 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2443
1995 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2502
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1995 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Coupe AT 2685
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2780
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Sedan AT 2708
EG 1995 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2313
EG 1995 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2392
EG 1995 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2376
EG 1995 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2440
EG 1995 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2522
EG 1995 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2575
1996 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2222
1996 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2298
1996 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2242
1996 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2317
1996 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2262
1996 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2339
1996 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2483
1996 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2513
1996 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2313
DC 1996 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1996 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1996 Acura Integra SE Coupe AT 2685
DC 1996 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2780
DC 1996 Acura Integra SE Sedan AT 2708
EK 1996 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2370
EK 1996 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2319
EK 1996 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2430
EK 1996 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2387
EK 1996 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2568
EK 1996 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2518
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS Coupe MT 2680
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1997 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2685
DC 1997 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2570
DC 1997 Acura Integra Type-R MT 2600
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS Sedan MT 2767
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1997 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2703
1997 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2304
1997 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2238
1997 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2319
1997 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2253
1997 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2337
1997 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2271
1997 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2496
1997 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2460
1997 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2339
1997 Honda Civic HX CPE AT 2324
EK 1997 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2370
EK 1997 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2319
EK 1997 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2438
EK 1997 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2387
EK 1997 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2568
EK 1997 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2518
I cut all the non civic/integra info out, I'll let someone filter out the Del Sol vs Civic info
http://www.hondaswap.com/forum...29355
and taken from the FAQ thread...
Originally Posted by jazz1320
EG 1993 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2275
EG 1993 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2342
EG 1993 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2319
EG 1993 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2388
EG 1993 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2520
EG 1993 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2564
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1994 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2529
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2703
EG 1994 Honda del Sol S MT 2301
EG 1994 Honda del Sol S AT 2387
EG 1994 Honda del Sol Si MT 2414
EG 1994 Honda del Sol Si AT 2474
EG 1994 Honda del Sol VTEC MT 2491
1994 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2108
1994 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2178
1994 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2264
1994 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2390
1994 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1994 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2231
1994 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2326
1994 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2443
1994 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2502
DC 1994 Acura Integra GS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1994 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1994 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2745
EG 1994 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2313
EG 1994 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2392
EG 1994 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2403
EG 1994 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2456
EG 1994 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2522
EG 1994 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2575
DC 1995 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2643
DC 1995 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2529
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Coupe MT 2643
DC 1995 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2738
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Sedan MT 2703
EG 1995 Honda del Sol S MT 2295
EG 1995 Honda del Sol S AT 2387
EG 1995 Honda del Sol Si MT 2414
EG 1995 Honda del Sol Si AT 2474
EG 1995 Honda del Sol VTEC MT 2522
1995 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2108
1995 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2178
1995 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2264
1995 Honda Civic Si HB MT 2390
1995 Honda Civic VX HB MT 2094
1995 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2231
1995 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2326
1995 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2443
1995 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2502
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1995 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Coupe AT 2685
DC 1995 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2780
DC 1995 Acura Integra SE Sedan AT 2708
EG 1995 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2313
EG 1995 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2392
EG 1995 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2376
EG 1995 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2440
EG 1995 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2522
EG 1995 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2575
1996 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2222
1996 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2298
1996 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2242
1996 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2317
1996 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2262
1996 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2339
1996 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2483
1996 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2513
1996 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2313
DC 1996 Acura Integra LS Coupe AT 2685
DC 1996 Acura Integra RS Coupe AT 2570
DC 1996 Acura Integra SE Coupe AT 2685
DC 1996 Acura Integra LS Sedan AT 2780
DC 1996 Acura Integra SE Sedan AT 2708
EK 1996 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2370
EK 1996 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2319
EK 1996 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2430
EK 1996 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2387
EK 1996 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2568
EK 1996 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2518
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS Coupe MT 2680
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS-R Coupe MT 2667
DC 1997 Acura Integra LS Coupe MT 2685
DC 1997 Acura Integra RS Coupe MT 2570
DC 1997 Acura Integra Type-R MT 2600
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS Sedan MT 2767
DC 1997 Acura Integra GS-R Sedan MT 2765
DC 1997 Acura Integra LS Sedan MT 2703
1997 Honda Civic CX HB MT 2304
1997 Honda Civic CX HB AT 2238
1997 Honda Civic DX HB MT 2319
1997 Honda Civic DX HB AT 2253
1997 Honda Civic DX CPE MT 2337
1997 Honda Civic DX CPE AT 2271
1997 Honda Civic EX CPE MT 2496
1997 Honda Civic EX CPE AT 2460
1997 Honda Civic HX CPE MT 2339
1997 Honda Civic HX CPE AT 2324
EK 1997 Honda Civic DX SDN MT 2370
EK 1997 Honda Civic DX SDN AT 2319
EK 1997 Honda Civic LX SDN MT 2438
EK 1997 Honda Civic LX SDN AT 2387
EK 1997 Honda Civic EX SDN MT 2568
EK 1997 Honda Civic EX SDN AT 2518