B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2
12-12-2004, 04:03 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alpharetta, Ga, USA
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2
What are the advantages of installing the type R manifold into my Si head?
maybe I should of asked this before I bought the damn thing...haha...and with the Type R Intake Manifold, what should I bore my Throttle Body to? 62mm or 64mm?
Anyone done this before? ...will I notice any difference at all? ...maybe faster Rpms cause of short runners?
maybe I should of asked this before I bought the damn thing...haha...and with the Type R Intake Manifold, what should I bore my Throttle Body to? 62mm or 64mm?
Anyone done this before? ...will I notice any difference at all? ...maybe faster Rpms cause of short runners?
12-12-2004, 07:49 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: running nines, but on two wheels
Posts: 2,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (WestEM1)
It is essentially a Skunk2 im. They are almost exactly the same. If you go to http://www.skunk2.com, I think they have dyno sheets for certain cars, but I don't know if they have any for our cars. I have heard from others that have dyno'd their cars that you lose a little low end, but gain a little in the top end.
-Shane
-Shane
12-13-2004, 04:58 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (JUN EK9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JUN EK9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the type-r is better than your stock one.
INSTALL THE BITCH AND DRIVE.</TD></TR></TABLE>
INSTALL THE BITCH AND DRIVE.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
12-13-2004, 05:07 AM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 16,516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (JDM_Ej)
who cares if it makes your car faster...your one part closer to being full blown JDM y0. Type rrrrrr intake mani is the way to go. 
But yea they are right and it will give you a little more up top. It is a better IM then you have currently!
But yea they are right and it will give you a little more up top. It is a better IM then you have currently!
04-04-2007, 09:27 PM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (VinceVTEC)
no one answered the question here
how much should one expect from doing this swap ? with proper TB
how much should one expect from doing this swap ? with proper TB
04-12-2007, 01:12 PM
#13
Unceasing Measure
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (Daniel-sanB1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Daniel-sanB1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no one answered the question here
how much should one expect from doing this swap ? with proper TB</TD></TR></TABLE>
Maybe 1 or 2 peak horsepower and a curve that shifts your peak torque further away from the lower RPM where you actually need it. It's a bad investment unless you've got big cams or forced induction, as the stocker is designed to keep your powerband in the shape most conducive to daily driving.
If you're looking for something that's going to take a few tenths off your E.T. you failed. If you wanted to do something to your motor and had some cash burning a hole in your pocket, you succeeded. I hope you're turbocharged, because every $50 you spend is one step further away from having a B16 that actually puts out a functional amount of torque
how much should one expect from doing this swap ? with proper TB</TD></TR></TABLE>
Maybe 1 or 2 peak horsepower and a curve that shifts your peak torque further away from the lower RPM where you actually need it. It's a bad investment unless you've got big cams or forced induction, as the stocker is designed to keep your powerband in the shape most conducive to daily driving.
If you're looking for something that's going to take a few tenths off your E.T. you failed. If you wanted to do something to your motor and had some cash burning a hole in your pocket, you succeeded. I hope you're turbocharged, because every $50 you spend is one step further away from having a B16 that actually puts out a functional amount of torque
04-12-2007, 02:16 PM
#14
B*a*n*n*e*d
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: es dee, ca
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
theres a dyno comparison on here somewhere
that shows how shitty a type r manifold is
compared to ur stock 1 without upgrades to
compliment it & a higher redline to actually take advantage of it
just because its type r doesnt make it better 4 ur setup
that shows how shitty a type r manifold is
compared to ur stock 1 without upgrades to
compliment it & a higher redline to actually take advantage of it
just because its type r doesnt make it better 4 ur setup
04-12-2007, 02:20 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 26,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: B18C5 Intake Manifold for my B16A2 (Archidictus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Maybe 1 or 2 peak horsepower and a curve that shifts your peak torque further away from the lower RPM where you actually need it. It's a bad investment unless you've got big cams or forced induction, as the stocker is designed to keep your powerband in the shape most conducive to daily driving.
If you're looking for something that's going to take a few tenths off your E.T. you failed. If you wanted to do something to your motor and had some cash burning a hole in your pocket, you succeeded. I hope you're turbocharged, because every $50 you spend is one step further away from having a B16 that actually puts out a functional amount of torque</TD></TR></TABLE>
Maybe 1 or 2 peak horsepower and a curve that shifts your peak torque further away from the lower RPM where you actually need it. It's a bad investment unless you've got big cams or forced induction, as the stocker is designed to keep your powerband in the shape most conducive to daily driving.
If you're looking for something that's going to take a few tenths off your E.T. you failed. If you wanted to do something to your motor and had some cash burning a hole in your pocket, you succeeded. I hope you're turbocharged, because every $50 you spend is one step further away from having a B16 that actually puts out a functional amount of torque
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
.RTErnie
Welding / Fabrication
18
09-28-2004 07:25 PM
