B16 Dyno
08-13-2003, 02:05 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Leandro, CA, USA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B16 Dyno
Here's the setup:
SRP Pistons 10.5:1
SI SS valves (0.5mm oversize)
bowl blended
Mugen Head Gasket
Mugen Valve Springs
Skunk II retainers
CTR cams
ITR intake manifold
JDM ITR Header
JDM ITR cat
Greddy SP catback
Hondata S100
What do you guys think? It was dynoed in a pretty hot day and it can't go any higher than this.
Modified by 93eg6 at 3:40 PM 8/13/2003
Modified by 93eg6 at 5:41 PM 8/14/2003
Modified by 93eg6 at 5:53 PM 8/14/2003
SRP Pistons 10.5:1
SI SS valves (0.5mm oversize)
bowl blended
Mugen Head Gasket
Mugen Valve Springs
Skunk II retainers
CTR cams
ITR intake manifold
JDM ITR Header
JDM ITR cat
Greddy SP catback
Hondata S100
What do you guys think? It was dynoed in a pretty hot day and it can't go any higher than this.
Modified by 93eg6 at 3:40 PM 8/13/2003
Modified by 93eg6 at 5:41 PM 8/14/2003
Modified by 93eg6 at 5:53 PM 8/14/2003
Trending Topics
08-13-2003, 03:32 PM
#11
New User
Re: (FkingSUV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FkingSUV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pic is down... what kinda numbers?</TD></TR></TABLE>
08-13-2003, 03:36 PM
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Longmont, CO, USA
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (FkingSUV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FkingSUV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pic is down... what kinda numbers?</TD></TR></TABLE>
08-13-2003, 04:50 PM
#13
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 5,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (FkingSUV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FkingSUV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pic is down... what kinda numbers?</TD></TR></TABLE>
08-13-2003, 05:42 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Goodluck Finding Me
Posts: 2,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (FkingSUV)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FkingSUV »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">pic is down... what kinda numbers?</TD></TR></TABLE>
08-14-2003, 05:08 PM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (93eg6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93eg6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">now it should be up... i hope...</TD></TR></TABLE>
it is up.
Good numbers. However I think you would make more power with regular sized valves seeing that you have very MILD mods. Most builders who do the B20 and LSvtec who are making 200+ whp don't even get OS valves because they have proven to hurt more then help your performance. The only stree driven cars that I'v heard of with .5 OS exhust valves are turbo charged B series. I think you would make a little more tq in the lower end. But thats just IMHO.
Very nice and smooth powerband.
So how long did it take to tune your hondata?
it is up.
Good numbers. However I think you would make more power with regular sized valves seeing that you have very MILD mods. Most builders who do the B20 and LSvtec who are making 200+ whp don't even get OS valves because they have proven to hurt more then help your performance. The only stree driven cars that I'v heard of with .5 OS exhust valves are turbo charged B series. I think you would make a little more tq in the lower end. But thats just IMHO.
Very nice and smooth powerband.
So how long did it take to tune your hondata?
08-14-2003, 05:23 PM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: San Leandro, CA, USA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the reason for the os valves was because this was supposed to be a turbo motor but i changed my mind to na...
the hondata didn't take that long to tune... it took around 6 dyno runs for the full throttle and 2 weeks of driving for partial...
the hondata didn't take that long to tune... it took around 6 dyno runs for the full throttle and 2 weeks of driving for partial...
08-14-2003, 05:32 PM
#21
New User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hotter than hell, Az, USA
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (93eg6)
Not being a dick, but for the mods you should be able to tune a little more out of it. You might want to try messing with it/Hondata a little more. I've seen cars with simular mods and chipped ECU make more power. Once again not being a dick, just want to see you get more out of a good setup. Later Allen
08-14-2003, 06:10 PM
#23
Re: (bEE338)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bEE338 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats 163hp at the wheels? whats that at the crank and is this a jdm b16a?</TD></TR></TABLE>
he has about 191 crank hp. just wanted to add that you should just bolt up a turbo to the sum bitch...163whp is nothing....i'm sure adding a turbo or any other FI to your motor will make the hp soar to 300whp or something close.
he has about 191 crank hp. just wanted to add that you should just bolt up a turbo to the sum bitch...163whp is nothing....i'm sure adding a turbo or any other FI to your motor will make the hp soar to 300whp or something close.
08-14-2003, 07:28 PM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: st.louis, mo, usa
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (MagillaGorilla)
i have a b16a (2nd gen) bonestock with a gsr tranny and act cluth and i just got it dynoed for the first time on sat and i made 157 whp .. this was with my a/f ratio off he said with an hour of tunning he could make another 10 whp..ill get some pics of the graph up soon