1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
I recently purchased a '94 Civic DX with a B16A swap. I noticed yesterday when I was plugging one of the tires that they were all wearing unevenly (heavy on the inside). The car is lowered with adjustable coil-overs and KYB struts. Should I get a camber kit or what would be the best way to straighten it out before purchasing new tires?
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northwest, IN, USA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
It probably needs an alignment or tie rod ends. Heavy wear on the inside is from incorrect toe.
I ran 2.25 deg neg camber on my first civic for years and the tire wear was even.
I ran 2.25 deg neg camber on my first civic for years and the tire wear was even.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
Would I take it to a regular mechanic if it needs aligned, like a Honda dealer? What about a camber kit?
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Missoula MT
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
i had the same problem with my coupe you defiantly need a camber kit if you never want to worry bout it and defiantly an alignment done
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
Is installing a camber kit someone can do a home with beginner/novice skills? Obviously I can't do the alignment.
#7
318 Curves, 11 miles
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
No.
No.
No.
How long have you been dropped on these tires? If the answer is a few months or a year, your problem is toe.
1. Within 90% certain that his problem is toe. Camber does not eat tires quickly. You will get a little extra wear over the life of the tire, but it doesn't significantly shorten the life... maybe a few weeks or months less, but not years.
2. I've been running 2.5 degrees negative camber for going on 6 months now, with no noticeable camber wear. So have thousands of other people, considering that lots of cars run a little camber from the factory.
3. Either way, he needs an alignment first. Ask to see the alignment sheets before and after. That will tell you exactly what's wrong. I guarantee it's toe.
4. The alignment guy will want to zero out your camber, and will tell you that you need a camber kit. This is not usually true - he's telling you that because Honda says that the factory camber spec on a Civic is 0 degrees. A few degrees of camber will positively affect cornering performance while not significantly affect tire life. It will cause a little bit of extra wear, but your tires should still last years.
5. Just because everyone on honda-tech says you need a camber kit doesn't mean it's true. Visit the suspension forum and talk to people who have actually tried lots of different suspension setups and know what works and what doesn't.
6. I make this exact same post about every 3.5 days, that being the frequency of people asking this question and getting bad information.
No.
How long have you been dropped on these tires? If the answer is a few months or a year, your problem is toe.
1. Within 90% certain that his problem is toe. Camber does not eat tires quickly. You will get a little extra wear over the life of the tire, but it doesn't significantly shorten the life... maybe a few weeks or months less, but not years.
2. I've been running 2.5 degrees negative camber for going on 6 months now, with no noticeable camber wear. So have thousands of other people, considering that lots of cars run a little camber from the factory.
3. Either way, he needs an alignment first. Ask to see the alignment sheets before and after. That will tell you exactly what's wrong. I guarantee it's toe.
4. The alignment guy will want to zero out your camber, and will tell you that you need a camber kit. This is not usually true - he's telling you that because Honda says that the factory camber spec on a Civic is 0 degrees. A few degrees of camber will positively affect cornering performance while not significantly affect tire life. It will cause a little bit of extra wear, but your tires should still last years.
5. Just because everyone on honda-tech says you need a camber kit doesn't mean it's true. Visit the suspension forum and talk to people who have actually tried lots of different suspension setups and know what works and what doesn't.
6. I make this exact same post about every 3.5 days, that being the frequency of people asking this question and getting bad information.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
^ x2 You don't need a camber kit, it's the toe being out of wack that's eating your tires.
I was lowered 2in without a camber kit, my tires wore perfect because I got an alignment.
When you get your alignment they'll tell you you need a camber kit blah blah blah, just tell them to set the toe to 0 and not worry about the camber
I was lowered 2in without a camber kit, my tires wore perfect because I got an alignment.
When you get your alignment they'll tell you you need a camber kit blah blah blah, just tell them to set the toe to 0 and not worry about the camber
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northwest, IN, USA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
318 Curves, 11 miles
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
To clarify my earlier statement a little bit.
Yes, camber is a factor in overall tire wear, but it's a very minor factor compared to toe wear. Toe WILL tear up tires faster than you can buy them.
I really think that the reason most people on h-t say that their tire wear problem was fixed by a camber kit is because they go get it aligned right after they get the camber kit... which fixes the toe problem.
Alternatively, it could be because their toe problem is made worse by a little bit of camber.... Because a little camber DOES make a toe problem dramatically worse.
Either way, the camber is not the root cause of the problem, the toe is. And toe is the root cause of almost all tire wear problems.
Yes, camber is a factor in overall tire wear, but it's a very minor factor compared to toe wear. Toe WILL tear up tires faster than you can buy them.
I really think that the reason most people on h-t say that their tire wear problem was fixed by a camber kit is because they go get it aligned right after they get the camber kit... which fixes the toe problem.
Alternatively, it could be because their toe problem is made worse by a little bit of camber.... Because a little camber DOES make a toe problem dramatically worse.
Either way, the camber is not the root cause of the problem, the toe is. And toe is the root cause of almost all tire wear problems.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northwest, IN, USA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
4. The alignment guy will want to zero out your camber, and will tell you that you need a camber kit. This is not usually true - he's telling you that because Honda says that the factory camber spec on a Civic is 0 degrees. A few degrees of camber will positively affect cornering performance while not significantly affect tire life. It will cause a little bit of extra wear, but your tires should still last years.
0* toe is was is important for tire wear. That is the key factor that everyone needs to remember.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
I agree.. I'm on stock suspension right now and have weird tire wear because my car needs an alignment...
in order to avoid civicgsr's problems, I say, screw the honda dealer, take it to sears or something, it's cheaper, and they're more likely to do what you ask without fighting you on it
in order to avoid civicgsr's problems, I say, screw the honda dealer, take it to sears or something, it's cheaper, and they're more likely to do what you ask without fighting you on it
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toronto, ontario, canada
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
my favourite link regarding camber kits https://honda-tech.com/forums/suspension-brakes-54/no-you-do-not-need-camber-kits-2614449/
#15
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
Ok - my next question... I have 16" wheels right now and am due for tires since the tires are wearing unevenly and are showing the steel braids on the inside. Should I get the alignment then purchase my new 17" wheels or get the wheels before the alignment?
#17
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
I'm gonna do the alignment tomorrow at a local NTB and then hopefully find a 17" wheel/tire package for around $600. I remember seeing packages from DiscountTireDirect.com for around $500 including s/h, mounted, balanced, etc. Nothing now though...
#19
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
Tires are wearing unevenly. They're wearing very fast on the inside and barely anything on the outside. I need to get all new tires now. Should I get it aligned or replace the tires first?
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northwest, IN, USA
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic DX - tired wearing unevenly
Longer answer, get it aligned and make sure the tie rod ends are good.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
E36 Guy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
16
04-07-2006 09:58 AM