1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!!
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere in, canada
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!!
I decided to go to the track to see what the Hatch would do. My best ran was 16.7 and that was my first run ever at the track. On the other four runs, third would not go in so the times all sucked. My 60' was 2.1 and R/T was .221
P.S The Hatch is Bone Stock, it doesn't even have a tach! My best R/T was .028
P.S The Hatch is Bone Stock, it doesn't even have a tach! My best R/T was .028
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Danktown, Ut, USA
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (Jamez)
Holy smokes batman. I live in utah and most of the stock gsr's around here run that. to Utah and elavation. Nice for your first time.
#5
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (c_buz)
Good runs. And your low reactions are not actually that great. You want to get a .500 light. That is considered perfect. Anything less (like your runs) is a red light. Just FYI for the next time you go to the track. Launch as the third yellow illuminates and that will give you a starting point. Tune it in from there.
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (Jamez)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jamez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those are DX times Do US CXs come with the same 70hp 1.5l 8V as us Canadians?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes.
we always think about getting some hampsters becaus they have more HP per litre
yes.
we always think about getting some hampsters becaus they have more HP per litre
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, Or, US
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (delScho)
FYI there are some tracks that have different software they are running and instead of .500 being a perfect light some use .000 as a perfect light. I know at our local track they just changed it to .000 this year. Hmmmm 16.7 out of a CX thats either damn good or I dont know and that 60ft seems very low thats a slicks 60ft.
#9
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (illusive)
That's odd on the timing software. More intuitive, but inaccurate in terms of what actually happens with the car and its position on the track. Then maybe a .026 is good, does that show my age?
#10
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (illusive)
My CX has a d15b7 in it so it goes a little bit faster than the stock cx engine.
Stock d15b8 = 70 hp / 83 torque.
d15b7 = 102 hp / 98 torque.
And from driving around in my car thats running on a b7 if this guy has a b8 in his CX and he ran a 16.7 then hes doing REALLY well.
Stock d15b8 = 70 hp / 83 torque.
d15b7 = 102 hp / 98 torque.
And from driving around in my car thats running on a b7 if this guy has a b8 in his CX and he ran a 16.7 then hes doing REALLY well.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland, Or, US
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (delScho)
I thought it was odd as well, but I guess they know what they are doing it is a NHRA drag strip. Thought it was odd going out for the season opener and swearing up and down I didnt red light and looking at a reaction time of less then .500 But then someone informed me of the change.
edit - if its a b7 powered CX then thats a descent time but I dont think a CX powered hatch could turn a time like that with its long *** gears and small motor stock but I could be wrong
Modified by illusive at 5:25 PM 6/21/2004
edit - if its a b7 powered CX then thats a descent time but I dont think a CX powered hatch could turn a time like that with its long *** gears and small motor stock but I could be wrong
Modified by illusive at 5:25 PM 6/21/2004
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere in, canada
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (Jamez)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jamez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those are DX times Do US CXs come with the same 70hp 1.5l 8V as us Canadians?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am from Canada!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delScho »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good runs. And your low reactions are not actually that great. You want to get a .500 light. That is considered perfect. Anything less (like your runs) is a red light.</TD></TR></TABLE>
On my second run my R/T was .028 plus the .500 for the light; therefore, the total reaction time was .528. That's .028 more than a perfect light. You seriously think that's not good???
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by illusive »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hmmmm 16.7 out of a CX thats either damn good or I dont know and that 60ft seems very low thats a slicks 60ft.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's a CX 1.5 Hatch. The Base model. It is not equipped with a passenger side-mirror (from factory!!!!) so I doubt it has the better motor. I was asked at the track by some guys why it ran so well?? My answer: you gotta know how to drive. There was an infinity g45 running 16.5 all day (old man driving). Like I said, Car is bone stock, the way it rolled out of the factory 10 years ago, and yes it comes without a tach (working on that). My first run was a 16.7 all my others sucked because third would not go in so I had to let off. Hell I even did a 17's after letting off. I raced an Integra type R with bf slicks, I/H/E that ran low 14's and all the way through first I was ahead. Then he ate me alive. LOL
I guess this goes to show that driving does matter. On my second run I went against a 140hp Cavalier (plus i/h/e) and I was ahead of him until I went to switch into third and it would not go in (gears grinded). If third had gone in, he would had been very embarassed. It's "too bad" i am swapping for a k20a; otherwise, I would look into the third gear issue and go kill some slow cars at the track. hehe.
P.S. I'll try to post my slips soon.
I am from Canada!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delScho »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good runs. And your low reactions are not actually that great. You want to get a .500 light. That is considered perfect. Anything less (like your runs) is a red light.</TD></TR></TABLE>
On my second run my R/T was .028 plus the .500 for the light; therefore, the total reaction time was .528. That's .028 more than a perfect light. You seriously think that's not good???
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by illusive »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hmmmm 16.7 out of a CX thats either damn good or I dont know and that 60ft seems very low thats a slicks 60ft.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's a CX 1.5 Hatch. The Base model. It is not equipped with a passenger side-mirror (from factory!!!!) so I doubt it has the better motor. I was asked at the track by some guys why it ran so well?? My answer: you gotta know how to drive. There was an infinity g45 running 16.5 all day (old man driving). Like I said, Car is bone stock, the way it rolled out of the factory 10 years ago, and yes it comes without a tach (working on that). My first run was a 16.7 all my others sucked because third would not go in so I had to let off. Hell I even did a 17's after letting off. I raced an Integra type R with bf slicks, I/H/E that ran low 14's and all the way through first I was ahead. Then he ate me alive. LOL
I guess this goes to show that driving does matter. On my second run I went against a 140hp Cavalier (plus i/h/e) and I was ahead of him until I went to switch into third and it would not go in (gears grinded). If third had gone in, he would had been very embarassed. It's "too bad" i am swapping for a k20a; otherwise, I would look into the third gear issue and go kill some slow cars at the track. hehe.
P.S. I'll try to post my slips soon.
#14
Global Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (b18bme)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b18bme »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Holy smokes batman. I live in utah and most of the stock gsr's around here run that. to Utah and elavation. Nice for your first time.</TD></TR></TABLE>
where you live gsr's run high '16s?
I think i'd move then
where you live gsr's run high '16s?
I think i'd move then
#15
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (delScho)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by delScho »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Then maybe a .026 is good</TD></TR></TABLE>
Read them all first.
It's just that most people would read that as a .528 light, not as a .028... but then there was the point someone brought up about using other software for the tree and timer... yada yada yada. Doesn't matter. Sorry I brought it up. You da man.
Read them all first.
It's just that most people would read that as a .528 light, not as a .028... but then there was the point someone brought up about using other software for the tree and timer... yada yada yada. Doesn't matter. Sorry I brought it up. You da man.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Somewhere in, canada
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (94EeGe)
Heck! it all depends. If you are pretty good at driving it it should. I think with a short throw, and new polyurethane linkage bushings I could do 16.5-16.3 (with luck).
#20
"so how did u know when to shift if you didn't have a tach?"
Are you serious ? You drive until you hit the rev limiter in each gear. And then look at the speed.
Ive done this in every non tached car ive driven. Its fun.
Are you serious ? You drive until you hit the rev limiter in each gear. And then look at the speed.
Ive done this in every non tached car ive driven. Its fun.
#21
I like it...gives me hope for my completely stock '02 VX! And it's very fun flooring 'til the rev limiter kicks you, even if you're trying to shift before you hit it.
#22
TSPeed Factory
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Renton, WA, Vietnam
Posts: 5,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (EJ8 D15Y8)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EJ8 D15Y8 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">"so how did u know when to shift if you didn't have a tach?"
Are you serious ? You drive until you hit the rev limiter in each gear. And then look at the speed.
Ive done this in every non tached car ive driven. Its fun.</TD></TR></TABLE>
pretty ghetto, but whatever works i guess
2.1 60' is pretty good, especially if you don't even know what RPMs you're launching at. what kind of tires are you running?
Are you serious ? You drive until you hit the rev limiter in each gear. And then look at the speed.
Ive done this in every non tached car ive driven. Its fun.</TD></TR></TABLE>
pretty ghetto, but whatever works i guess
2.1 60' is pretty good, especially if you don't even know what RPMs you're launching at. what kind of tires are you running?
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: On., Can.
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CDM civic cx's of that era came with the 16v 102hp 1.5l engines (like the dx's).
16.7 seems really good for even that motor, good launch i guess; did you even trap 80mph?
Before i swapped my 1.5 out, i tested it against my friends '86 8v golf gti (with less milage) and i could pull from him pretty steadily. I believe they were low 17 second cars.
d
Modified by daver at 4:28 AM 6/22/2004
16.7 seems really good for even that motor, good launch i guess; did you even trap 80mph?
Before i swapped my 1.5 out, i tested it against my friends '86 8v golf gti (with less milage) and i could pull from him pretty steadily. I believe they were low 17 second cars.
d
Modified by daver at 4:28 AM 6/22/2004
#24
Member
Re: 1994 Civic CX 1/4 mile times!! (JDM EK9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM EK9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bone stock 70hp cx did 16.7? </TD></TR></TABLE>
no kiddin my VX doesnt even run that fast stock
no kiddin my VX doesnt even run that fast stock