Octoberfest Show (85+ pics, 3 videos)
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Octoberfest Show (85+ pics, 3 videos)
Octoberfest show in Fontana, CA
Videos
Quad with Bags -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...6.MPG
Motorcycle burn out -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...6.MPG
Just Bouncin' -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...2.MPG
Modified by gtravsr at 3:08 PM 9/29/2003
Modified by gtravsr at 3:12 PM 9/29/2003
Videos
Quad with Bags -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...6.MPG
Motorcycle burn out -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...6.MPG
Just Bouncin' -> http://www.travisharrell.com/o...2.MPG
Modified by gtravsr at 3:08 PM 9/29/2003
Modified by gtravsr at 3:12 PM 9/29/2003
#5
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Carlo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Carlo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Every freakin' car has flames!</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha yeah, too many flames for sure. 95% of the vehicles there I wouldn't ever want to own but they were pretty cool to look at. For some reason crazy paint, flames, etc, works better on trucks than it does on cars. (imo) Either way, most of the lifted *** trucks were things I hate on the road but up close I could appreciate all the work put into them. I guess I'm just starting to be more open minded about cars and trucks these days.
At least I wasn't worried about my GSR getting jacked at that show...When I walked out to my car after the show my 2" drop looked like a 4x4 though.
Modified by gtravsr at 3:49 PM 9/29/2003
haha yeah, too many flames for sure. 95% of the vehicles there I wouldn't ever want to own but they were pretty cool to look at. For some reason crazy paint, flames, etc, works better on trucks than it does on cars. (imo) Either way, most of the lifted *** trucks were things I hate on the road but up close I could appreciate all the work put into them. I guess I'm just starting to be more open minded about cars and trucks these days.
At least I wasn't worried about my GSR getting jacked at that show...When I walked out to my car after the show my 2" drop looked like a 4x4 though.
Modified by gtravsr at 3:49 PM 9/29/2003
Trending Topics
#8
New User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: RICHMOND, VA, UNITED STATES
Posts: 4,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (kwik2nec)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kwik2nec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i haven't seen so much candy paint in one plays until this </TD></TR></TABLE>
#13
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (hondaZvic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondaZvic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
but that sc s2k is very nice. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, my pic of the outside of it didn't come out but it was stock anyway...with a slight drop. the guy that drove it was all stunna-fied though.
but that sc s2k is very nice. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, my pic of the outside of it didn't come out but it was stock anyway...with a slight drop. the guy that drove it was all stunna-fied though.
#20
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Posts: 2,186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ebelp)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Too much bling! btw, awesome quality pics! What camera do you use?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah, I'm all blinged out. The camera was a Sony Cybershot p9. It's 4 megapixel. To allow enough pics and vids on the 64mb card I had the rez set at 1280x960 but on some the res was at 640x480. The really clear pics were the 1280 ones that I resized to 640x480 for easier web viewing. The slightly blurry ones were the ones taken at 640x480 on the camera. So now I know not to use that setting. I wouldn't have though it would matter since they were going to end up at 640x480 anyway, but it did.
yeah, I'm all blinged out. The camera was a Sony Cybershot p9. It's 4 megapixel. To allow enough pics and vids on the 64mb card I had the rez set at 1280x960 but on some the res was at 640x480. The really clear pics were the 1280 ones that I resized to 640x480 for easier web viewing. The slightly blurry ones were the ones taken at 640x480 on the camera. So now I know not to use that setting. I wouldn't have though it would matter since they were going to end up at 640x480 anyway, but it did.
#25
Re: (JspecB18Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JspecB18Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sweet merciful crap!!!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
mmmmmmmmmmmmm..................good
</TD></TR></TABLE>
mmmmmmmmmmmmm..................good