Camera Question?????
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
From: Billionaire Boys Club, CA
Any one have samples of pictures that where taken with a 4.0 mega pixel camera? Is the mega pixel the most important feature in a camera? Info would be gratly appreciated
.
.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ekferio »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">did you do any post processing work on it? clean picture</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EM2MoNsTeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Rodrez, Do you think the brand of camera matters?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0.
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EM2MoNsTeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Rodrez, Do you think the brand of camera matters?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0.
yea, megapix aren't the MOST important, however they are nice to have. i have a 5.0 and KJ's woops my pics, i just startin taken pics maybe for 3 months now. but here are mine.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=611499
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=612865
i do think the brand is important. sort get what you pay for. http://www.dpreview.com is a good site to learn about some digi cams.
also another member UNSUNGEM1 uses a 3.2 sony camera. takes very nice pics as well.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=611499
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=612865
i do think the brand is important. sort get what you pay for. http://www.dpreview.com is a good site to learn about some digi cams.
also another member UNSUNGEM1 uses a 3.2 sony camera. takes very nice pics as well.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.
Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0. </TD></TR></TABLE>
impressive rodrez!! yes KJ is a pic ***** and he's good
speaking of dpreview.com, IMO most people there are pro canon because all new canons are automatically jumped to the top spots
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0. </TD></TR></TABLE>
impressive rodrez!! yes KJ is a pic ***** and he's good
speaking of dpreview.com, IMO most people there are pro canon because all new canons are automatically jumped to the top spots
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That was taken by a sony mavica?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That was taken by a sony mavica?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ekferio »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
IMO most people there are pro canon because all new canons are automatically jumped to the top spots</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, they seem to be really popular lately. The quality is great, the pics are crisp, and again the layout/menu is excellent IMO.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SiRiusRcr214 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
That was taken by a sony mavica?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No, that was actually a Canon.
IMO most people there are pro canon because all new canons are automatically jumped to the top spots</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, they seem to be really popular lately. The quality is great, the pics are crisp, and again the layout/menu is excellent IMO.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SiRiusRcr214 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
That was taken by a sony mavica?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No, that was actually a Canon.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JSJ EK HATCH »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">any one use the Sony DSC-P92 before im mite pick one up let me know what u think about it thanks </TD></TR></TABLE>
My buddy was using one of those, he loved it, said it was point and click, but I don't have any examples. Here's a review board for that cam: http://www.dpreview.com/review...scp92
My buddy was using one of those, he loved it, said it was point and click, but I don't have any examples. Here's a review board for that cam: http://www.dpreview.com/review...scp92
rodrez's always got his camera ready for every meeting in socal
here some a sample picture taken with my fujifilm f402 with third generation super ccd
i dont want to resize it because i want the show the details..
ah..nevermind, imagestation wont allow..here the compressed/shitty preview..
and here the rest of the pictures in my album
http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4289165809
here some a sample picture taken with my fujifilm f402 with third generation super ccd
i dont want to resize it because i want the show the details..
ah..nevermind, imagestation wont allow..here the compressed/shitty preview..
and here the rest of the pictures in my album
http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4289165809
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iam7head »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">where can i host picture online with better resolution? imagestation's horrible when comes to this..
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree. I started using we-todd and it's much better
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree. I started using we-todd and it's much better
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.
Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0. </TD></TR></TABLE>
actually i am using the 3.2 sony bro.....kj has the nikon

that was taken with my 3.2mp sony so no i dont think mp are the biggest feature but they sure do help.....thats why i am moving up to a 5mp
Thank you very much. No, I don't use any post processing work on any pics, l'natural
.Not really, I mean if it's a good quality trusted brand, I don't think it matters too much. Everyone has their preferences, I just started taking pics about 8months ago with my roommates Canon S200, and I got used to the settings and menu's. I've played around with other digi-cams in the store, but I still prefer the Canon layout, and feel, so I've stayed loyal to Canon. But if you want to see some really nice pics, look at KJ's shots, I believe he's using a 3.2MP Sony, those pics kill mine, so it's not all about the MP. Probably would want to stay away from anything under 2.0. </TD></TR></TABLE>
actually i am using the 3.2 sony bro.....kj has the nikon
that was taken with my 3.2mp sony so no i dont think mp are the biggest feature but they sure do help.....thats why i am moving up to a 5mp
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aaron Taylor
Honda / Acura
13
Apr 15, 2003 09:55 PM



