why lower compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:12 PM
  #1  
kool168's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default why lower compression?

why people have to lower the compression of the enigne when they add turbo?
sorry for noob question
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:18 PM
  #2  
PrecisionH23a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,296
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Default Re: why lower compression? (SOL-R)

It's provides more of a safe-range when tuning for a turbocharged motor. Lower compression lessens the chance of detonation.

here you go:
https://honda-tech.com/zerosearch
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #3  
alloutmotor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY, USA
Default

you dont have to lower the compression....the reason why we lower the compression is because we are limited by the amount of octane available on the streets, the higher the compression you use the hotter your combustion chamber gets, if you run a turbo on that, you will have more heat in the combustion chamber....then you will need higher octane that doesnt pre-ignite at certain pressures and heat...

alot times you dont really need to lower the compression ratio, unless your car came with like 12:1 from the factory or something.....

when choosing compression ratio for a turbo car you are making a compromise..either high compression and low boost....the turbo will spool a bit better..(high meaning 10:1-10.5:5)
but you will have to have the engine tuned well so you dont get detonation

or lower compression compression ratio higher boost, and a slightly less chance of getting detonation.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #4  
kool168's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: (alloutmotor)

so the higher compression the engine, the lower boost = less power
and the lower compression the engine, the higher boost = more power?
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #5  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (SOL-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOL-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so the higher compression the engine, the lower boost = less power
and the lower compression the engine, the higher boost = more power?</TD></TR></TABLE>

yep
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
DaX's Avatar
DaX
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,118
Likes: 667
Default

There is a fine line between maximum performance and breaking stuff. By running a high compression ratio and decent to high boost numbers, you are pushing closer and closer to this line.

Some NA racers are running insane CR's [I think Bisi is running something like 15:1], and it takes incredible tuning to keep from blowing **** up at that high of a CR. When you add boost, it compounds the difficulty of controlling your engine. But it's people like Bisi that push the envelope and are out there running 10's in a carbeurated 1.5.

Running a conservative CR allows you to crank the boost up with fairly good confidence [all assuming you are well tuned] that your motor will last.
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 08:53 PM
  #7  
kool168's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default Re: (DaX)

thankz
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 09:13 PM
  #8  
Bulldogg83's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,961
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (SOL-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOL-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so the higher compression the engine, the lower boost = less power
and the lower compression the engine, the higher boost = more power?</TD></TR></TABLE>

honestly that can go either way......with higher compression it will take you less boost to reach the power goals you are shooting for, but you run much more of a risk of blowing something as to lowering the compression and running more boost is somewhat safer.......
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #9  
MaxSterling's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 570
Likes: 1
From: Alhambra, CA, 91801
Default Re: why lower compression? (SOL-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOL-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why people have to lower the compression of the enigne when they add turbo?
sorry for noob question</TD></TR></TABLE>

b/c race gas is expensive
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #10  
Haberdasher's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Default Re: (SOL-R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOL-R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so the higher compression the engine, the lower boost = less power
and the lower compression the engine, the higher boost = more power?</TD></TR></TABLE>

it's more like higher compression engine, lower boost = lower compression engine, higher boost

the difference is going to be in things like where the turbo starts to spool and where the power band sits in the RPM range.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2004 | 03:42 AM
  #11  
JDogg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,072
Likes: 2
From: Raleigh, NC
Default Re: (Haberdasher)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Haberdasher &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

it's more like higher compression engine, lower boost = lower compression engine, higher boost

the difference is going to be in things like where the turbo starts to spool and where the power band sits in the RPM range.</TD></TR></TABLE>

not really..... we made 500hp on pump gas.. granted the engine had 7.8ish:1 compression.. you're not gona do that with a 10:1 motor
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hoggy
Forced Induction
10
Jul 12, 2004 11:12 AM
BallHawk3
Forced Induction
14
Jan 24, 2004 08:15 PM
Fatty_1775
Forced Induction
17
Mar 7, 2003 02:31 PM
baonest
Tech / Misc
4
May 7, 2002 10:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:53 AM.