Notices

Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2004, 07:49 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Rexemouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Western, Ma, Usa
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission

I am swapping a b18 ls motor into my 4th gen civic. I I basically have everything but the transmission.(most of the turbo components, exedy stage 1 clutch, 4500 injectors, msd, guages, shift linkages, ex)

Now, I heard that an Ls Transmission is more suitable for turbocharging aposed to a Gsr Transmission... Is this true and if it is, why?
Old 10-23-2004, 08:07 PM
  #2  
Member
 
Makdaddynuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: louisiana, USA
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (Rexemouse)

you will never get a straight forward answer on this. It also depends on your demands. People with say a b16 is better because shorter gears = quicker acceleration. And a LS tranny has too long of gears. I think a GSR is the way to go, its in between the ls and b16, perfect for all around
Old 10-23-2004, 08:25 PM
  #3  
z6
Honda-Tech Member
 
z6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Winnipeg, manitoba, Canada
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what youve got to do is use the gear ratios properly, you don t want to finish the quarter just after shifting to 5th, figure out your estimated mph in the quarter and then explore you options with gear sets and final drives.
Old 10-23-2004, 08:28 PM
  #4  
 
_entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (Rexemouse)

Everything you have heard people saying about the LS transmission is wrong. Longer gears are not better for boost, technically it keeps your turbo spooled for "longer" but that just means you're accelerating slower. For a stock LS with a stock LS rev limit, the LS transmission is acceptable. If you do not have a transmission right now I would be on the hunt for a GSR transmission, they have perfectly spaced gears for great acceleration, but not too tight that you just blast through each gear spinning like a ****.
Old 10-23-2004, 08:32 PM
  #5  
*insert here*
 
VTECisSeXY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Wooster, OHIO, US
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

gsr is where it's at
Old 10-23-2004, 08:53 PM
  #6  
 
BigBooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (VTECisSeXY)

i would recommend the GSR or b16 tranny as well. screw the LS. it's only good for saving gas.
Old 10-23-2004, 09:53 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blackeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by @lbert &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Everything you have heard people saying about the LS transmission is wrong. Longer gears are not better for boost, technically it keeps your turbo spooled for "longer" but that just means you're accelerating slower. For a stock LS with a stock LS rev limit, the LS transmission is acceptable. If you do not have a transmission right now I would be on the hunt for a GSR transmission, they have perfectly spaced gears for great acceleration, but not too tight that you just blast through each gear spinning like a ****.</TD></TR></TABLE>

im going gsr tranny in my ls turbo also. honestly, id love to have gsr 1-4 and an ls 5th gear. gsr tranny (redlining at 7 grand as per stock ls motor) tops out at like 53 in 2nd, 75 in 3rd, 99 in 4th and 130 in 5th. it supposedly also cruises at like 4200 ish at like 80mph in 5th gear. this is just a little higher than id like, but it should make the car a lil bit faster. i couldnt fathom a b16 tranny on there
Old 10-23-2004, 09:56 PM
  #8  
 
_entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (blackeg)

The 4000 RPM drone does get a pinch annoying on the highway, but it is no big deal, and better than a B16 tranny atleast. I can't tell you how much more fun my car is to drive with the GSR trans vs. the LS trans though.
Old 10-24-2004, 10:21 AM
  #9  
 
D-meet07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (@lbert)

Well what about this. What kind of tranny would be needed for the 91 integra ls. I forget what the linkage is??? Im wanting longer gears as well for that road racing and that 1st gear holding to like 30-35 miles and hr.
Old 10-24-2004, 10:50 AM
  #10  
Member
 
11psiTurboSI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6,004
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (turbo90lude)

b18c1 or b16a tranny!
Old 10-24-2004, 11:40 AM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blackeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (turbo90lude)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turbo90lude &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well what about this. What kind of tranny would be needed for the 91 integra ls. I forget what the linkage is??? Im wanting longer gears as well for that road racing and that 1st gear holding to like 30-35 miles and hr.</TD></TR></TABLE>


unless you feel like doing a cable-&gt;hydro conversion, stick with either the 91 ls stock tranny, or the tranny off a b17 gsr
Old 01-22-2005, 09:37 PM
  #12  
 
Tony Starks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central, NJ
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission (blackeg)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by blackeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">id love to have gsr 1-4 and an ls 5th gear.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I love mine
Old 01-22-2005, 10:26 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
vtec99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: midwest city, ok, united states
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have the type r tranny and some people say that i show get rid of it should i im looking at making 350 to the ground on b16
Old 01-24-2005, 08:42 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
vtec99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: midwest city, ok, united states
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bump
Old 01-24-2005, 09:46 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blackeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default Re: (vtec99)

ok since this thread is still alive, i have a real short vid of my ls with gsr trans going from 0-90..its not boosted yet, but if you watch the speedo and the tach it can give an idea of shift points and whatnot.

http://www.ezarchive.com:80/ez...8hVjU
left or right click to save

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtec99 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have the type r tranny and some people say that i show get rid of it should i im looking at making 350 to the ground on b16</TD></TR></TABLE>

the only thing i would to is get an aftermarket lsd, for i hear that the oem lsd's dont like too much hp and tq
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
93ls10.0
Transmission & Drivetrain
25
12-02-2010 11:07 AM
steveharrmr23
Transmission & Drivetrain
4
10-01-2008 03:18 PM
ErikDaGenErik
Forced Induction
5
01-15-2007 06:54 AM
Hoppa
Acura Integra
19
05-07-2006 01:47 PM
Rain n Blood
Acura Integra
6
08-18-2004 04:51 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo Question; Ls vs Gsr Transmission



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:59 PM.