Turbo B16a2 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 10:49 AM
  #1  
bangingears14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Icon2 Turbo B16a2 Build

The car will be my daily in the summer time, Im aiming for atleast 350whp. Would like to get some experienced opinions and see if my goal is achievable with some reliability.
The motor is a B16a2
Wiseco 9:1
Eagle Rods
Acl race main and rod bearings

Stock Head

Turbo setup
Bullseye t3/t4 go autoworks spec turbo 0.70a/r
Trackforged Ram Horn
46mm Precision Wastegate
Custom dumptube
Full 3" exhaust
Mishimoto M Line Intercooler
3" Charge Pipes
Tial 50mm BOV
Mac Electronic Boost solenoid

Fuel System
Walbro 255lph pump
Full stainless steel lines from pump to rail -6feed, -4 return
Precision 780cc Injectors
91 Octane is the best we get here

This will all be dyno tuned on Hondata s300. Not sure which intake manifold Im going to use, thinking edelbrock and a 68 or 70mm throttle body. One of my main concerns is the stock head, do you guys recommend that I put some valve train in it? Anyway, thanks alot looking forward to the responses.

Last edited by bangingears14; Oct 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 11:33 AM
  #2  
Autoworks's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

IMO:
-3" charge pipe set isnt needed, I'd use a 2.5" coldside/hotside
- stock fuel return hardline will work as well...you really dont need to change the feed line unless it is just a "want to" thing. You can convert the line at the firewall to -6 with a flareless fitting and -6AN it to the rail with an inline filter. We do this quite often on 92-00 Civics.

350whp is easily achivable on a stock B16 head without much effort. You can swap stock cams and retain the stock valvetrain as you wont have to rev the car past the stock limiter to make that power. A victor X is a great FI manifold IMO
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 12:10 PM
  #3  
NotARaCist's Avatar
I never narc'd on nobody!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9,537
Likes: 2
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

One of these days, we'll break you people of this fascination with lowered compression. Stock is 10.2:1. Stay around 10.5:1. That little motor needs all the help it can get in the torque department. Also, I'm not totally up to snuff on the limits of different fuels, so hopefully someone else chimes in on that, but 91 might be a limiting factor for you.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 12:29 PM
  #4  
bangingears14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

Originally Posted by Autoworks
IMO:
-3" charge pipe set isnt needed, I'd use a 2.5" coldside/hotside
- stock fuel return hardline will work as well...you really dont need to change the feed line unless it is just a "want to" thing. You can convert the line at the firewall to -6 with a flareless fitting and -6AN it to the rail with an inline filter. We do this quite often on 92-00 Civics.

350whp is easily achivable on a stock B16 head without much effort. You can swap stock cams and retain the stock valvetrain as you wont have to rev the car past the stock limiter to make that power. A victor X is a great FI manifold IMO
Would 3" charge piping cause lag or not be as effective as the 2.5? I find it hard to look at the 2.5" piping myself. The car already has the -6 feed and -4 return so thats to my advantage. I will definitely get the Victor X, what throttle body would be sufficient for my setup? 68 or 70mm? Thanks alot for the input.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 12:30 PM
  #5  
bangingears14's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

Originally Posted by NotARacist
One of these days, we'll break you people of this fascination with lowered compression. Stock is 10.2:1. Stay around 10.5:1. That little motor needs all the help it can get in the torque department. Also, I'm not totally up to snuff on the limits of different fuels, so hopefully someone else chimes in on that, but 91 might be a limiting factor for you.
Yeah If it were up to me I'd run 10:5:1 but thats the block that came in the car, might as well run it for now..Thanks
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 12:45 PM
  #6  
NotARaCist's Avatar
I never narc'd on nobody!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9,537
Likes: 2
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

I skipped right past that. Yeah no, you don't want 3" piping. Why is 2.5" "hard to look at"? That doesn't make any sense.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2014 | 01:39 PM
  #7  
DC_Legacy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Holiday, FL
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

Here's my current setup which is an SiRII JDM B16A from HMO + Y21 Hydro w/LSD . Stock block never been opened +

.57 Garrett T3/T4
Spoolin performance log
440cc Inj
255LPH Walbro
3" Ex from DP on out
38mm Tial WG
350 whp Precision IC
Stock Intake / LS TB
OEM B16 cams

250 WHP@7650 175WTQ@7000 with very flat TQ curve

Here's the mods I want for another 100WHP

725 or 1000cc ID's (Mtber says no difference in idle quality for same price)
GSR cams
GTX2860r
InlinePro manifold
or
SPA cast topmount
CP or Supertech pistons keeping compression in the 10.5:1 neighborhood
Eagle rods balanced
(will try to keep oil squirters by piston skirt clearance or by bending squirters if needed)

Optional if time/money provides....

P72 head after exchanging my PR3 core to Clearwater Cylinderhead
GSR BBK Intake
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2014 | 05:15 AM
  #8  
ls joker's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 161
From: toledo
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

10.8 pistons
eagle rods
gsr cams
dont need a ramhorn, itll just shift your powerband.
50, 57trim, or tga 5454
oem intake manifold will suffice, but a pro series would be alot better
id1000s
walbro255hp
tial 38mm wastegate
3" downpipe
24 pack of coors

no reason why you want get 350 with these parts
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2014 | 04:23 PM
  #9  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

3" piping isn't needed until you get well over 500hp... On anything under that is just increases lag time. 2.5" is all you need.

Also a 46mm wastegate is overkill and the precision wastegates are total ****. Stick with TiAL or Turbosmart
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2014 | 09:12 PM
  #10  
NotARaCist's Avatar
I never narc'd on nobody!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 9,537
Likes: 2
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

Originally Posted by wantboost
3" piping isn't needed until you get well over 500hp... On anything under that is just increases lag time. 2.5" is all you need.

Also a 46mm wastegate is overkill and the precision wastegates are total ****. Stick with TiAL or Turbosmart
So what you're saying is...Precision stuff in general is ****
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2014 | 07:39 AM
  #11  
wantboost's Avatar
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 10
From: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Default Re: Turbo B16a2 Build

Basically.

In a cycle test eBay gates failed first, precision not long after, and the TiAL and Turbosmart gates both lasted so long they just stopped the test before they failed lol. I don't remember what number they stopped at but it was a lot.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
builtboostedteg
Acura Integra
4
May 2, 2007 03:30 PM
DFW
Forced Induction
1
Feb 22, 2005 02:30 PM
joepiscapo_83
Forced Induction
2
Dec 1, 2004 08:17 AM
M.A.R.C.
Forced Induction
36
Nov 20, 2003 09:14 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:59 PM.