spooling sooner

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 04:32 PM
  #1  
yungkhmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: up north, wa
Default spooling sooner

I originally bought this turbo thinking i was going to do a fully built sleeved b20z block and built gsr head.funds ran low. super low. I couldn't do it anymore so i slapped everything together just to see what it could do. Runs peeeeeeeeeeeeerfect. except for the fact that it hits full boost at around 6k. And when it hits, its roasting tires and i gotta death grip the steering wheel.With my stock block b20z im kinda hesitant to take it any higher than 8k rpm's so is there anyway possible with more tuning can i somehow make this turbo spool sooner? lets say instead of 6k maybe 5k? i thought being 2.0liters would help spool the turbo faster but i guess wrong.

B18B1 head
blox intake manifold
str 67mm tb
crower 403's degreed
springs & retainers
skank2 gears

stock block b20z

precision pt6765

in a few months i wont be using this LS head, going to swap it out for a semi built gsr head.I know the turbo is big but what else really can i do to make it spool faster? NO, i dont wanna get a smaller turbo unless i get a good deal so thats outta the question. any help?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 04:47 PM
  #2  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: spooling sooner

Nothing really. You're using a big turbo on a small engine (yes sub 3.0 litre is small), on something that creates over 80lbs of air per min. So, with your setup the exhaust energy your engine creates for this turbo is only going to be really efficient in the 5k-8k range anyway. Using nitrous with it on the street will just make the driving characteristics worse,. So... Enjoy it for what it is.

Big turbo.. for big power.. what were you expecting?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 06:02 PM
  #3  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: spooling sooner

Correct me as I may be wrong, but running less IGN timing as the turbo spools will achieve a faster spool. This is not going to make this turbo spool like the 50 trim this motor needs but it should help.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 06:10 PM
  #4  
Dc4LsTeG's Avatar
EK9
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,270
Likes: 2
From: so cal,ca
Default Re: spooling sooner

What manifold and what size downpipe are you using?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 08:35 PM
  #5  
yungkhmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: up north, wa
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by Dc4LsTeG
What manifold and what size downpipe are you using?
just a basic ramhorn and an open 3in down pipe that cuts off right behind the oil pan.Someone had told me in my case that maybe a lil back pressure would help with spool.So should i get like a 3in resonated test pipe and another 3in resonator all the way back?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 08:36 PM
  #6  
yungkhmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: up north, wa
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by Natural Aspirations
Correct me as I may be wrong, but running less IGN timing as the turbo spools will achieve a faster spool. This is not going to make this turbo spool like the 50 trim this motor needs but it should help.
i think i remember something saying something about timing but instead of less to run more? but wouldnt i be more prone to knocking?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 09:01 PM
  #7  
DC4KiD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21,728
Likes: 0
From: Oakland, CA
Default Re: spooling sooner

Get a smaller turbo. Or get a bigger engine.

/thread.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 09:12 PM
  #8  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by Natural Aspirations
Correct me as I may be wrong, but running less IGN timing as the turbo spools will achieve a faster spool. This is not going to make this turbo spool like the 50 trim this motor needs but it should help.
mmmmm. Not really.. not enough to help the OP, anyway. But you also lose acceleration from the retarded timing.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 02:21 AM
  #9  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: spooling sooner

Yea I wasn't sure how that worked..... Never had the chance to test it out.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 05:09 AM
  #10  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by Natural Aspirations
Yea I wasn't sure how that worked..... Never had the chance to test it out.
You're thinking of AGGRESSIVE timing retard to create a 2 step effect in order to get the turbo to "spool up" at stop lights and tracks. But it can't be used as a progressive way to have the turbo work faster while driving. Doing it either way too often would cause the manifold to go through a lot of heat and hurts the manifold and turbo over time.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 05:23 AM
  #11  
Natural Aspirations's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,957
Likes: 0
From: nothing is real unless it is observed
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by TheShodan
You're thinking of AGGRESSIVE timing retard to create a 2 step effect in order to get the turbo to "spool up" at stop lights and tracks. But it can't be used as a progressive way to have the turbo work faster while driving. Doing it either way too often would cause the manifold to go through a lot of heat and hurts the manifold and turbo over time.
No not aggressive 2 step style. Something I read, but it was on the Interwebz
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 06:12 AM
  #12  
crvtectim's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 3
From: Pensacola, FL.
Default Re: spooling sooner

I would think that any safe amount of ignition timing that could be added before the turbo begins to build boost (and taken away after pressure is seen) would increase the spool time a little bit, not 1K rpms sooner. It's all irrelevant really, until you're able to examine the results on the dyno. Wouldn't a good tuner know to do this as to make your car less a turd before boost?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #13  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by crvtectim
I would think that any safe amount of ignition timing that could be added before the turbo begins to build boost (and taken away after pressure is seen) would increase the spool time a little bit, not 1K rpms sooner. It's all irrelevant really, until you're able to examine the results on the dyno. Wouldn't a good tuner know to do this as to make your car less a turd before boost?
I know what you mean, and yes, a bit of increased timing could possibly help, but not to the extent that OP wants to move an 80lbs/min+ turbo on a small sub 3.0 Litre for street use. The turbo is just too big to be responsive.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2012 | 08:08 PM
  #14  
tagperformance's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Default Re: spooling sooner

I would get some aftermarket rods and a custom set of flat top pistons 10.5:1 comp or higher. also you can get a turbine blanket for the turbo it will help it spool sooner.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 11:09 AM
  #15  
darkhorizon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Default Re: spooling sooner

the least amount of exhaust will result in the fastest spool.

the least amount of timing you can bear will create the fastest spool

the more fuel you can dump into the motor can sometimes result in faster spool

compression does not have nearly the effect on spool some would make you believe, but it does make out of boost perf somewhat better.

I have a PT6776 on my car.. I run active antilag on the street to use it, but my car is making 650+whp running on 10.5x28 slicks RWD.... You really need that type of power in a honda on the street?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 04:23 PM
  #16  
Whiterice-gsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 4
From: Canada
Default Re: spooling sooner

just sell the 6765 and buy something smaller man. maybe a surfer from theshodan
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 06:30 PM
  #17  
DirtyDA9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 2
From: Suburbs of Philadelphia
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by darkhorizon
the least amount of exhaust will result in the fastest spool.

the least amount of timing you can bear will create the fastest spool

the more fuel you can dump into the motor can sometimes result in faster spool

compression does not have nearly the effect on spool some would make you believe, but it does make out of boost perf somewhat better.

I have a PT6776 on my car.. I run active antilag on the street to use it, but my car is making 650+whp running on 10.5x28 slicks RWD.... You really need that type of power in a honda on the street?
I have a feeling you have no idea what you are talking about. And I call BS on your 650hp RWD claims.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 09:05 PM
  #18  
skateboard_ej8's Avatar
im hench irl
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 14,339
Likes: 1
From: Socal
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by darkhorizon
the least amount of exhaust will result in the fastest spool.

the least amount of timing you can bear will create the fastest spool

the more fuel you can dump into the motor can sometimes result in faster spool

compression does not have nearly the effect on spool some would make you believe, but it does make out of boost perf somewhat better.

I have a PT6776 on my car.. I run active antilag on the street to use it, but my car is making 650+whp running on 10.5x28 slicks RWD.... You really need that type of power in a honda on the street?
Am i reading this correctly?

Reply
Old Feb 12, 2012 | 09:22 PM
  #19  
DirtyDA9's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 2
From: Suburbs of Philadelphia
Default Re: spooling sooner

^^^ you mean are you reading ALL OF IT right...
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 05:58 AM
  #20  
darkhorizon's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Default Re: spooling sooner

Originally Posted by esco562
Am i reading this correctly?

Yeah?

I suppose I meant to say exhaust PIPE and whatnot.. A 4inch dia dump out the bottom of the car is going to be the fastest spooling exhaust possible.

The rest is accurate...

And my 650whp PT6776 car is not a honda, its a domestic pushrod thing.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2012 | 07:06 AM
  #21  
skateboard_ej8's Avatar
im hench irl
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 14,339
Likes: 1
From: Socal
Default Re: spooling sooner

Oh i see.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 02:44 PM
  #22  
yungkhmer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: up north, wa
Default Re: spooling sooner

anybody wanna trade me for a smaller turbo? i think a precision sc34 or a turbonetics 60-1 would be better for my setup. what do you guys think?
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2012 | 02:51 PM
  #23  
Whiterice-gsr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,249
Likes: 4
From: Canada
Default Re: spooling sooner

a 6262 would work well or a gt3076r, 57 trim, depends what your power goals are and what kind of characteristics u want it to have. gt28, 50 trim will be wicked fast spool.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CeeJayy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
Feb 22, 2007 06:28 AM
joek84
Forced Induction
32
Feb 22, 2005 05:22 AM
joek84
Forced Induction
8
Jan 2, 2004 02:09 PM
AzN_Flava
Forced Induction
18
Apr 14, 2002 07:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:35 AM.