SAFC-II or V-AFC?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAFC-II or V-AFC?
I've got a choice I have to make within the next week or so; I am currently running ZC (non vtec) but future plans might include a (96-98) vtec head on an overbored stock block (88-91). My question is, Can I run a VAFC on my ZC? I realize I don't have vtec on this motor but is it worth it to run this controler for fuel delivery instead of the SAFC-II? Or do I have to have vtec in order to operate the fuel system? Does anybody know where I'm comming from?
#2
Member
Re: SAFC-II or V-AFC? (crx-neo)
The only difference between the VAFC and the SAFC is the VTEC control. Without VTEC don't waste the money.
Then, the SAFCII is better than the SAFC/VAFC, with more options and better corrections. But for a turbo... There are better options out there.
Then, the SAFCII is better than the SAFC/VAFC, with more options and better corrections. But for a turbo... There are better options out there.
#3
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realize the SAFC II is better, but for future plans, what can be done for vtec control? Vtec is new to me, I only have one close friend with it and he knows even less than I do. I read something the other day about engaging vtec with one wire. Is this system reliable or should I depend on a multifunctional unit that already does it well? With that said, does anybody know if I can run the SAFC II and later hook up a primitive Vtec control unit along with the SAFC II, or for that matter would I even need vtec control?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
afc, air, bette, control, controller, difference, fuel, honda, ii, safc, safc2, safcii, safcvafcneo, tec, vtec