PTE 6466

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 20, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #1  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default PTE 6466

Anyone running the PTE 6466? Thinking about trying this turbo out next season but I would like to hear some reviews since its still somewhat new and I couldnt find much info. on it.

Looking for some dyno graphs, videos, etc.. and yes I have already seen the one miller posted..
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 04:28 PM
  #2  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default Re: PTE 6466

Don't all jump at once now..
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2012 | 09:26 PM
  #3  
*TurboLover*'s Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default Re: PTE 6466

6266 vs 6466 vs 6766..its on a 2JZ but gives you an ideas
https://honda-tech.com/forums/drag-racing-36/precision-6266-vs-6466-vs-6766-dyno-graphs-inside-3042214/
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2012 | 01:53 AM
  #4  
rich7777's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,379
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham, UK
Default Re: PTE 6466

Did you try here? http://bit.ly/Q9nETJ
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 11:36 AM
  #5  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default Re: PTE 6466

Originally Posted by rich7777
Did you try here? http://bit.ly/Q9nETJ
Did you actually READ this before posting your worthless 2 cents? Love how your link comes up to MY post. SMH

Anyone running the PTE 6466? Thinking about trying this turbo out next season but I would like to hear some reviews since its still somewhat new and I couldnt find much info. on it.

Looking for some dyno graphs, videos, etc.. and yes I have already seen the one miller posted..
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 12:28 PM
  #6  
extralargenog's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 7
From: Blah Blah Blah, wa, Erf
Default Re: PTE 6466

Dyno plots on another motor are ******* pointless... I hate when people do that ****.

Ive looked, and not found much related to Hondas. The one or 2 IVe seen. looked alot lazier than I expected. Like to see one on a H or K motor.


In for info as Im shopping, and would consider one...
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #7  
A BeastyDC4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: wisconsin
Default Re: PTE 6466

looks promising, op maybe you should test one out and give us results on how well it works.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 01:49 PM
  #8  
Spawne32's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 5,392
Likes: 1
From: New Jersey
Default Re: PTE 6466

Heres another good thread with a comparison http://bit.ly/Q9nETJ
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 02:22 PM
  #9  
extralargenog's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 7
From: Blah Blah Blah, wa, Erf
Default Re: PTE 6466

You really dont have a clue to the point do you...


Par.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 05:27 PM
  #10  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default Re: PTE 6466

Originally Posted by extralargenog
Dyno plots on another motor are ******* pointless... I hate when people do that ****.

Ive looked, and not found much related to Hondas. The one or 2 IVe seen. looked alot lazier than I expected. Like to see one on a H or K motor.


In for info as Im shopping, and would consider one...
Talking to a few tuners they have said the 6466 spools ABOUT the same as a 6266. How true this is I dont know but this will be on a 84mm GSR.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #11  
extralargenog's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 7
From: Blah Blah Blah, wa, Erf
Default Re: PTE 6466

I look forward seriously to seeing how it works out for you...

DO you have any idea how hard youre going to push it?
What fuel
PSI?
Power "goal" etc..

Im interested
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2012 | 08:55 PM
  #12  
gringotegra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,750
Likes: 5
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Default Re: PTE 6466

We made 850whp@35psi on it, in a 2.0L Evo. Not quite the same but closer to a honda than a 2jz is lol. I'll see if i can drum up the dyno tomorrow
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default Re: PTE 6466

Originally Posted by extralargenog
I look forward seriously to seeing how it works out for you...

DO you have any idea how hard youre going to push it?
What fuel
PSI?
Power "goal" etc..

Im interested
Not TO hard because im still on stock fuel lines so it will run out of fuel at the 720ish mark. The 6262 WOUlD work fine with my setup but I don't like running a turbo almost maxed out. Just asking for disaster IMO.

I will be running C16 race gas, and as much PSI as it takes to get me to that 720 mark again. (I will end up buying a surge kit sometime next year)

I just HOPE this turbo isnt THAT laggy. I know my BB 6265 sure was. Heard the 6466 will spool about the same with alot higher whp rating.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 08:44 AM
  #14  
extralargenog's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 7
From: Blah Blah Blah, wa, Erf
Default Re: PTE 6466

I have a friend that had a 6265 on an H... HE hated it, said it was laggy... (Coming from a T04ZR like mine, 67 MM) another that came from a GT30R then a 3582R on a H with one, its laggy and lazy too... First guy put a 6766 on his motor and its like a lightswitch again compared to the 6265... Makes no sense, but hes right.

Pretty sure guy number 2 is going with a 6766 as well now

Im gong bigger, DOnt think Ill stop at the 6466, but am interested... Im thinking 6768 or a buddy has a brand new S372 with the race cover I can get for DIRTTTTT...
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 09:45 AM
  #15  
gringotegra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,750
Likes: 5
From: Vancouver, WA, USA
Default Re: PTE 6466

Originally Posted by DA 4 Lyfe
Not TO hard because im still on stock fuel lines so it will run out of fuel at the 720ish mark. The 6262 WOUlD work fine with my setup but I don't like running a turbo almost maxed out. Just asking for disaster IMO.

I will be running C16 race gas, and as much PSI as it takes to get me to that 720 mark again. (I will end up buying a surge kit sometime next year)

I just HOPE this turbo isnt THAT laggy. I know my BB 6265 sure was. Heard the 6466 will spool about the same with alot higher whp rating.
The 66 turbine wheel they have is the cool new ****. I keep hearing that the 6266 spools quicker than the old 6262 but i haven't seen it yet. I think they mean it spools quicker than the 6265 which spools like poo like Spiker said. I'd be surprised if it truly spools quicker than the 6262.

The 6262 i have on my car does great, made 690whp and could make a little more if i push it. I understand what you say about not pushing the turbo, but when they say stock fuel lines max out at 720ish is that with the AFR's @ 11.5 or are the AFR's 13.0? I know we made 757whp on stock lines a few years ago in my friends car but it was a 12.7-13.0 all across the board. It was on Q16 tho and it liked to be in that area. Not sure if C16 likes it that lean.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2012 | 10:20 AM
  #16  
DA 4 Lyfe's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 884
Likes: 1
From: Albany, NY
Default Re: PTE 6466

Originally Posted by gringotegra
The 66 turbine wheel they have is the cool new ****. I keep hearing that the 6266 spools quicker than the old 6262 but i haven't seen it yet. I think they mean it spools quicker than the 6265 which spools like poo like Spiker said. I'd be surprised if it truly spools quicker than the 6262.

The 6262 i have on my car does great, made 690whp and could make a little more if i push it. I understand what you say about not pushing the turbo, but when they say stock fuel lines max out at 720ish is that with the AFR's @ 11.5 or are the AFR's 13.0? I know we made 757whp on stock lines a few years ago in my friends car but it was a 12.7-13.0 all across the board. It was on Q16 tho and it liked to be in that area. Not sure if C16 likes it that lean.
I would love to run the 6262 but IMO would be pointless since I plan to upgrade my fuel system down the road. The 6265 Is a real laggy sum' bitch even with a twin scroll manifold. I'm just hoping that with my new setup (84mm bore, 9:7:1 pistions, RLZ head work) will spool up that BB 6466 84.AR faster then my old setup (BB 6265 with a 1.15 AR, 83mm bore, 9:1 pistions)


When I say max out I mean anymore PSI it wont hold anymore power it will just start to lean out. Not 100% sure of the AFR's as I didnt dyno the car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
highroller54
Forced Induction
6
Sep 29, 2010 01:34 PM
tobe1424
Forced Induction
6
Sep 12, 2006 08:12 PM
FMXer
Forced Induction
30
May 12, 2003 11:51 AM
vwandhondaboy
Honda Prelude
1
Sep 29, 2002 06:47 PM
itr--779
Acura Integra Type-R
37
Apr 19, 2002 02:42 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:22 PM.