Precision Turbo Which model to chooose???
Hey guys, im boosting my integra and i need help deciding on which turbo to use.
So far here is my set up
94 teg LS
b18c1 motor
Itr trans w lsd
3" exhuast
most likely 2.5" dp
etc
Im looking to be puttin down about 260 at first and increasing boost next winter to get 310 whp
It's my daily driver so i;m not looking for insane whp
Anyways, im deciding between the precision sc32, sc50 and sc 61 turbos.
Wat kind of setups/whp are you guys with these turbos getting? Also, about what rpms are you achieving full boost? Thanks alot guys, and any other pointers would be helpful.
So far here is my set up
94 teg LS
b18c1 motor
Itr trans w lsd
3" exhuast
most likely 2.5" dp
etc
Im looking to be puttin down about 260 at first and increasing boost next winter to get 310 whp
It's my daily driver so i;m not looking for insane whp
Anyways, im deciding between the precision sc32, sc50 and sc 61 turbos.
Wat kind of setups/whp are you guys with these turbos getting? Also, about what rpms are you achieving full boost? Thanks alot guys, and any other pointers would be helpful.
if you are wanting 310whp then get the sc34... its a good turbo i got it on my car and it spools good. if ya want more i would get the sc61...
sc34
sc34
I agree with them^^^^
SC34 would be a nice turbo for your setup! If you are looking for a turbo that will be nice and have potential to make alot more power later down the road the sc61 would be nice!
SC34 would be a nice turbo for your setup! If you are looking for a turbo that will be nice and have potential to make alot more power later down the road the sc61 would be nice!
I say go for the sc61. At 10 psi on a stock b18c, people have made almost 360whp, and they say it spools around 5k rpm's. Not too bad for the GSR motor, b/c it will rev to 8k.
Trending Topics
If his goal is only 310whp, why not just go with the SC50? It's efficient to around 400whp, which makes it perfect for your goals, its smaller and faster spooling and will still have some room to grow above your current goal if you change your mind.
My vote goes with the SC50 unless you want bigger numbers.
My vote goes with the SC50 unless you want bigger numbers.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by m R g S r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> his goal is only 310whp</TD></TR></TABLE>
HERRRR I'm a girl thanks.
HERRRR I'm a girl thanks.
Kate,
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Arturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Kate,
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Damn, what engine was te 491whp made on? I hear with the .48 A/R they are good to 400whp. I'm assuming this was done with the .63.
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Damn, what engine was te 491whp made on? I hear with the .48 A/R they are good to 400whp. I'm assuming this was done with the .63.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Arturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Kate,
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.
I would actually go with the SC50. The SC50 is a more effcient turbo and has the largest major diameter of all the T04E family. Its a fun set up and Ive seen 491whp at 30psi. So for your goals and a more "fun" set up I'd go with the SC50.
art</TD></TR></TABLE>
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mchuang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not with an SC50 though! 491whp is alot on that size turbo and will spool very quickly. Turbo "A" might make 350whp at 20 psi with a FASTER spool and nice powerband, Turbo "B" might make 400whp at 20 psi with a slower spool and less usable powerband. I would probably take Turbo "A".
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>Not with an SC50 though! 491whp is alot on that size turbo and will spool very quickly. Turbo "A" might make 350whp at 20 psi with a FASTER spool and nice powerband, Turbo "B" might make 400whp at 20 psi with a slower spool and less usable powerband. I would probably take Turbo "A".
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mchuang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>
But this was 5 years ago when there was no hondata, AEM or anything that you could plug in.
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>But this was 5 years ago when there was no hondata, AEM or anything that you could plug in.
Guest
Posts: n/a
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mchuang »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Dam 491 on 30psi sucks ***. We have a b16 stock bore size puttin out 513 on 24
psi. Its a 1.8 liter though but still standard size bore.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
asianeric
Forced Induction
24
Apr 23, 2007 09:37 PM
Htounndea
Forced Induction
14
Nov 11, 2006 06:43 PM





