dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

Ok so after hours of searching and soaking up alot of info i have narrowed my decision down to atleast the brand of turbo i want to go with!!! Precision Billet 6262 or 6765

I just cant decide between the 2

Has anyone had one of these of there own and if so can u tell me ur likes or dislike, Spool time,HP numbers,TQ numbers ect,ect

My motor is a 2.0 ERl sleeved ls/vtec, Fully built head P&P by Pure Tuning. (All the goodies)
Im looking for a max of 700HP (which will be no problem with either turbo)
Car will be a Street/Strip racer

ANY SUGGESTIONS 6262 OR 6765

Im kinda leaning towards the 6765, I feel like the extra lag or later spool with be better for the street????

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

Well, you'll easily be able to find threads regarding the 6262, but a little less on the 6765, which is much more used as a drag race turbo. you will feel extra lag on both of them. Its just a question of what it is you want to do with the car, really.

0mtber

iTrader: (2)

TheShodan nailed it :-)

joe111599

Max of 700whp....go the the 6262 and you will be more then happy with that turbo.

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

Don't forget the Borg-Warner S262 and Garrett Reaper 62mm. those are other choices to consider as well

Borg-Warner S362



Garrett Billet Reaper

cevax

oops wront thread

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

My car will be a weekend racer defenitly will not be driving it everyday.
I will be using a beefed up b16 with ls final drive.

I would say the main use of the car will be on pump gas!

Joe from tempist racing recommended either the 6765 or 6262 but was leaning me more towards the 6765, I just figured i ask around on HT for a little more input.

THANKS GUYS FOR ALL UR INPUT

ScorpionT

The 6262 and s362 are more than capable of 700whp consistently. With the 6262 I definitely recommend getting the dbb version for reliability reasons.

.nate

Considering Precision no longer uses Garrett parts, I'd personally look at other manufacturers.

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

I'm concerned about the Precision DBB cartridge sysstem because it uses "Air" instead of water for proper cooling. I have no personal experience first hand of it, but some clients I've dealt with did not like this engineering and went back to Garrett, due to some issues with the ports getting proper access to air based upon the placement of the turbocharger. If anyone has more data regarding this phenomenon, please give your emphirical input (dyno numbers are not what I'm requesting)

ScorpionT

Ive seen them run and they are performing pretty well. The ceramic bearings wont produce the heat of metal bearings, so the water cooling isnt really necessary. Yes, I do prefer the water cooling myself, but I havent seen problems so far. That would be unfortunate if guys arent getting enough cooler air to the turbo for proper cooling, and they would definitely be better off with a Garrett.

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

Thanks for all ur input. It is definitly appreciated.

WhiteEJCoupe

you want less lag for the street instead of more lag. i had the 6262 on my k20 and even though it made a nice number (517@16psi), i hated the lag. it wasnt making that 16psi until almost 6500 on a k20. so i got rid of it and went to a 5857 and i love it 10x better. it spools the 16psi at 5500 rpms and makes 490@16psi. for a street car, i dont think you want to go that big. but if those are your choices then 6262 (cuz its smaller then 6765). all 3 turbos are capable of making power if you just turn up the boost.

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

Ceramic bearings deal with the same heat properties as a steel alloy. They changed over to steel over 10 years ago, due to the cracking issues of the bearings themselves in many of the aftermarket and OEM applications. Ceramic bearings have been used on even oem applications for almost 30 years from Rayjay turbos to turbonetics of the late 90s and those used today. The problem was by the time these bearings cracked, they were well before the life of the rest of the turbocharger. The ceramic materials of the bearings has changed slightly, but still doesn't address the issues that some are having with correct access to cooler air in the cartridge. I appreciate your input, but I'm looking for a little more here.

QUICK8CIVIC

My car will be a weekend racer defenitly will not be driving it everyday.
I will be using a beefed up b16 with ls final drive.

I would say the main use of the car will be on pump gas!

Joe from tempist racing recommended either the 6765 or 6262 but was leaning me more towards the 6765, I just figured i ask around on HT for a little more input.

THANKS GUYS FOR ALL UR INPUT

I suggest the 6765..in drag racing, little lag can be your friend too.

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

Yes i thought a little lag would be helpful on the street. Dont get me wrong It will be a weekend racer but i will also be cruising on the streets. Prolly run into a occansional street race.
My first decision was between the BW S366 and the Precision 6262/ 6765. Then i narrowed it down to a precision turbo.
I think im gonna go with the 6765

gizzmo222

I have a 6765 on a stock sleeve LS/VTEC and I made 466 @ 17psi on 93 octane pump gas. The spool time is horrible, I don't really build boost till 5500rpm's. Currently I went 11.3 @ 123mph with a **** 60'. I love the turbo and have read a couple of threads with guys making silly power. I am just gunna save my pennies and get a sleeved bottom end and give it hell!!

crucian

If it's going to be a weekend racer go with the bigger turbo and high revs. If you are going to run on the street, don't expect to get the jump on anyone with the bigger turbo especially with the B16.

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

Why do u say especially with the B16?

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

???

Turbo-charged

b16's are a little sluggish on the bottom end compared to a b18...but they love to rev. we use the 67's and 62's all the time. i just got off of the phone 3 seconds ago with one of our customers who is torn between the 2 turbo's as well. with a good turbo set up the difference in lag is pretty minimal, but the 67 makes more power. they will both make your power goals but the 62 is going to take a lot more boost to do it.

after speaking with you on the phone about what you plan to use the car for.....i would go with the 67. everybody always wants more power....so i'd go with a turbo that can make more power than what you are shooting for so you dont have to buy a new turbo once you decide you want to go faster

MadVTI

My mate runs a s362, very good results and quite nice on street and the noise is addictive. Billet ones are also very good but would say use smaller one TBH if choosing billet, personally i dont think ul need one. Lag can premote more wheel spin on road tyres if u go too big on the turbine.

crucian

This is what I was getting at.

dpcgtp

iTrader: (2)

How are b16 trans sluggish on bottom end. I thought the b16/GSR trans used the same first gear ratio and the rest of the b16 gears are shorter wouldnt that make it rev faster/ Get to full boost faster. Or am i wrong??? Explain Please. I love to learn

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

he's talking about displacement, not the transmission. THe B16 likes to get to the high rpms, but because it creates very little torque, depending upon use, it can appear "sluggish" compared to the other B-series models that you may consider with that large of a turbocharger. It takes a lot of exhaust energy to get that big sucker moving. I think staying 62mm is the better option, IMHO