peakboost vs. fullrace

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
CXtypeR's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Default peakboost vs. fullrace

discuss price vs. quality vs. power
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #2  
TheShodan's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 24,555
Likes: 241
From: City of Wind, IL, USA
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (CXtypeR)

Too long to do. Both are great, and well-driven companies.. There are many posts about this, please do diligence to research and make your own best decision.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:19 AM
  #3  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

^^i agree....whichever you chose, you'll be happy with
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #4  
zexxbo's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,887
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Schister66)

peakboost ftw
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 10:54 AM
  #5  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (zeimbo)

They both suck
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
93turbo16's Avatar
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 3
From: Carlisle, Pa, USA
Default Re: (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They both suck</TD></TR></TABLE>

Finally the truth comes out. haha

Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #7  
BoostedEG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsville VA
Default Re: (tony1)

hahaha and thats why you run them

Tony likes the sucky parts
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:25 AM
  #8  
93supercoupe's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
From: Dont Steal My Car, Ct, USA
Default Re: (BoostedEG6)

this is going to turn into a shitshow
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #9  
BoostedEG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsville VA
Default Re: (93supercoupe)

like always
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 12:00 PM
  #10  
vestalfootball72
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (BoostedEG6)

Never had any full race stuff (yet) but I do have a peakboost intercooler kit and its perfect
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 12:16 PM
  #11  
Professor15's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,353
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, N.y, usa
Default Re: (Schister66)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Schister66 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">^^i agree....whichever you chose, you'll be happy with</TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 01:58 PM
  #12  
spoolin turbo s's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: gate city, VA, usa
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (TheShodan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheShodan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Too long to do. Both are great, and well-driven companies.. There are many posts about this, please do diligence to research and make your own best decision.</TD></TR></TABLE>

if both are great then why does 1 cost more than the other
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:02 PM
  #13  
boosted92's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,411
Likes: 1
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (spoolin turbo s)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by spoolin turbo s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

if both are great then why does 1 cost more than the other </TD></TR></TABLE>

Because one is robotic welded/more engineered and has a bigger name to back it up.

I would say better engineered, but I don't know if you can say that a F-R Ramhorn will absolutely make more power than a Peakboost ramhorn. So I guess we can just say there has been more engineering time put into it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:10 PM
  #14  
b18sihatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (boosted92)

i have the FR stage 3gt kit, and i wouldnt run nothing but full race product.

im not a bandwagoner either

i am a stickler for quality and full race does nothing but bring quality to the table

aside from being top notch in quality, they never lose their innovation when it comes to the market, they stick behind their products, their products quality, and the engineering that goes into all their products.

the prices are high but you get what you pay for, quality isnt cheap, neither is research & devlopment, so you have to take alot of things into consideration.

and full race does have the big name to back it up, but i dont think a name makes the quality, the quality makes the name, and so thats my take on FR
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #15  
B18C1CYA's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 1
From: Ny,NY
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (CXtypeR)

One thing I see gets over looked is what sch material is being used , I am not sure what Peakboost uses but Full-Race uses sch 40 wich is alot more durable and will last longer than sch10 , do a search this topic has ben covered before
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #16  
b18sihatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (B18C1CYA)

^ i forgot that too, they do use the SCH40 forged SS for their manifolds which is very durable, i dont know if i have heard of the manifolds ever cracking
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #17  
spoolin turbo s's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
From: gate city, VA, usa
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (b18sihatch)

i'm not choosing one or the other im just wondering the differences since they are not priced the same

i have a VW and i can get a lifetime warrantied mani that looks alot like full races for a whole lot less ....but if i had the money and full-race had the products for my Dub i would be all over it

but i am now in the market for a turbo honda and would like to know the difference in the 2

i know that usually you get what you pay for almost all the time but not always

so what is the full race kit price and what is the peakboost kit cost?


after you answer that then tell me why full race costs more
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:35 PM
  #18  
zexxbo's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,887
Likes: 0
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (spoolin turbo s)

google? youre sitting on a computer, how can you be so lazy? full-race cost more because they use "the best" parts and have "the best" quality welds and "the best" design. you may gain ~5whp by switching to full-race over its competitors and your manifold will be made out of slightly better steel and everything will be slightly "better"
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #19  
b18sihatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (zeimbo)

i think that is pretty much untrue, full race makes alot of different kits, some ac some not, some top mount some ramhorn, some with ball bearing turbos, some with journal bearing turbos.

R.O.B.O.T.I.C. W.E.L.D.I.N.G that is also what you pay for when it comes to full race
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 03:17 PM
  #20  
PeakBoost's Avatar
B*A*N*N*E*D
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 0
Default Re: (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They both suck</TD></TR></TABLE>

i agree.


Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 03:29 PM
  #21  
NJslvrtypes's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Die Thieves, NJ, 07456
Default Re: (PhoenixTurbo.com)

You won't be disappointed with either!!!

Close thread this could get ugly
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #22  
PrecisionH23a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,296
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
Default Re: (tony1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They both suck</TD></TR></TABLE>

And you swallow.

You can't go wrong with either kit
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 04:00 PM
  #23  
tony1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Default Re: (PrecisionH23a)

For those PM'ing me, lol, it was a joke. They both make good stuff...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #24  
jdm94eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
From: Cold ass ohio
Default Re: (tony1)

both awsome in my eyes but i went with lovefab lol
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 04:55 PM
  #25  
JDM_EH2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: United States
Default Re: peakboost vs. fullrace (b18sihatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b18sihatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have the FR stage 3gt kit, and i wouldnt run nothing but full race product.

im not a bandwagoner either

i am a stickler for quality and full race does nothing but bring quality to the table

aside from being top notch in quality, they never lose their innovation when it comes to the market, they stick behind their products, their products quality, and the engineering that goes into all their products.

the prices are high but you get what you pay for, quality isnt cheap, neither is research & devlopment, so you have to take alot of things into consideration.

and full race does have the big name to back it up, but i dont think a name makes the quality, the quality makes the name, and so thats my take on FR </TD></TR></TABLE>

Well said my friend I also have a FR Stage 3 GT kit and it's awesome
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:05 AM.