LS crank?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,856
Likes: 0
From: poopfacepartytime, ca, usa
Re: (tokesGTR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tokesGTR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
And why the hell would you want to do that instead of using a GSR/LS block? So you can have a less stable piston in the bore because you have to use a tiny compression height piston? Don't you remember the Tech43 guy who was selling kits like this that used tons of oil, and generally sucked ***? Running those internals in a B16 block will not make it rev higher/faster/better than those internals in a B18 block, and pose nothing but problems.
The B16A deck height is 7.992", the B18C/B deck height is 8.347". You don't have to move the pin 2mm up, you have to move the pin up about 9mm, 0.355 inches. When you're starting off with a piston of a 1.185" compression height, you realize how massive of a difference .355" is. You push the pin right through the oil ring, which is bad.</TD></TR></TABLE>
for once we agree on something
And why the hell would you want to do that instead of using a GSR/LS block? So you can have a less stable piston in the bore because you have to use a tiny compression height piston? Don't you remember the Tech43 guy who was selling kits like this that used tons of oil, and generally sucked ***? Running those internals in a B16 block will not make it rev higher/faster/better than those internals in a B18 block, and pose nothing but problems.
The B16A deck height is 7.992", the B18C/B deck height is 8.347". You don't have to move the pin 2mm up, you have to move the pin up about 9mm, 0.355 inches. When you're starting off with a piston of a 1.185" compression height, you realize how massive of a difference .355" is. You push the pin right through the oil ring, which is bad.</TD></TR></TABLE>
for once we agree on something
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
