Ku engineering version 2 intake manifold
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sticks of WI
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ku engineering version 2 intake manifold
Found this when browsin for an intake manifold and the 75mm TB for my build. I am going to be doing a 300+whp daily turbo build - 400+ tracktime. I am thinkin I may give this a try. For tubo I am thinkin this may be very beneficial. What you all think? What kind of issues can I expect to see do to not having all the OEM sensors?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...wItem
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...wItem
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dont Steal My Car, Ct, USA
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (coptzer)
its probably mirrored(sp).
Yeah, really, for the prive and the power u wanna make, theres better options.
And really, at 400HP, an IM isnt that nescary.Id rather have a b16 IM and CTR cams w/ the 400 hundred u didnt spend on that.
Yeah, really, for the prive and the power u wanna make, theres better options.
And really, at 400HP, an IM isnt that nescary.Id rather have a b16 IM and CTR cams w/ the 400 hundred u didnt spend on that.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia, australia
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.japengineshop.com/
Just had a look through this site that sells KU products. Why that manifold not listed anywhere?
Just had a look through this site that sells KU products. Why that manifold not listed anywhere?
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sticks of WI
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (dai-18t)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 93supercoupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">its probably mirrored(sp).
Yeah, really, for the prive and the power u wanna make, theres better options.
And really, at 400HP, an IM isnt that nescary.Id rather have a b16 IM and CTR cams w/ the 400 hundred u didnt spend on that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I really don't think I would ever buy it, I was just wanting to get other opinions on it.
I thought it looked decent and wanted to see what others thought of it.
Yeah, really, for the prive and the power u wanna make, theres better options.
And really, at 400HP, an IM isnt that nescary.Id rather have a b16 IM and CTR cams w/ the 400 hundred u didnt spend on that.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I really don't think I would ever buy it, I was just wanting to get other opinions on it.
I thought it looked decent and wanted to see what others thought of it.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Honda_Fanatic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Honda_Fanatic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">IACV - IAT - not sure but maybe others'</TD></TR></TABLE>
you will not be able to run an IAC... rough and high idling that you'll have to sacrifice unless you can disable that sensor...
edlebrok is my choice... simple and big..iac compatible, etc etc
you will not be able to run an IAC... rough and high idling that you'll have to sacrifice unless you can disable that sensor...
edlebrok is my choice... simple and big..iac compatible, etc etc
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sticks of WI
Posts: 2,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (BEEYOND)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BEEYOND »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you will not be able to run an IAC... rough and high idling that you'll have to sacrifice unless you can disable that sensor...
edlebrok is my choice... simple and big..iac compatible, etc etc </TD></TR></TABLE>
I sent you a PM!
Thanks
edlebrok is my choice... simple and big..iac compatible, etc etc </TD></TR></TABLE>
I sent you a PM!
Thanks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DragInteg
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
05-04-2004 09:15 AM