Notices

Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2002, 09:10 AM
  #1  
R59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ct.
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5

I have a 97 R and i want to throw in a JRSC. I want to do this over all motor and turbo mainly because it seems as if it is the easiest solution for making some hp while not having to maintain it every other day like a turbo..Everyone says it sucks and yet most who have it say they love it..To me, i don't see whats wrong with 225 whp at only 5.5 psi. Those who have one really don't have as much of a problem with heat and friction as everyone says.....Plus, i think it would work well with my Spoon 421, Carsound cat, and Toda flywheel...

I know this was probably covered before, but any honest opinions before i throw my cash on one would be appreciated.....thanx...
Old 10-24-2002, 09:16 AM
  #2  
DSF
Honda-Tech Member
 
DSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

Is it bad...no. Will it make as much power as a turbo...no. Is a well thought out turbo system a maintenance nightmare...no.
Old 10-24-2002, 09:19 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
PM-Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Reading, PA, usa
Posts: 12,978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (DSF)

my friend got one on hs R with juice and fully built motor and I ran faster than him with a few bolt ons and some juice.
he has spent about 30K more in his car and work and I still run faster. . . . imo , i would never go JRSC , doesnt seem to make the power.
Old 10-24-2002, 11:43 AM
  #4  
R59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ct.
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (itr206)

Well i still don't see how 225 whp is gonna be slow...I can get the SC for 2 grand... A lot less than a turbo or N/A...
Old 10-24-2002, 11:44 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Speedworks801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: N Ogden, UT, USA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (itr206)

The JRSC works just fine on a Type R, and it does make power all the time. Properly setup between 210-230whp is a good result. I've installed 30 JRSC kits and they are very functional, especially for first time FI guys. It's maintenence free with no danger of overboosting and no oiling concerns. The two biggest problems with Turbo-charging. It won't make the power that a turbo can, but not everyone has to have it. A good JRSC car does better at autoXing due to its ability to quickly and accurately modulate boost with throttle input and absolutely no lag. It is a solid choice for 50-70whp and lots of low end grunt.
Old 10-24-2002, 11:44 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
PM-Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Reading, PA, usa
Posts: 12,978
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

its up to you really, im just giving my 2 cents, Im not impressed by them at all .
Old 10-24-2002, 11:45 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
speedy108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Knoxville, TN, U.S.
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Speedworks801)

Very well said with good points too
Old 10-24-2002, 12:12 PM
  #8  
R59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ct.
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Speedworks801)

The JRSC works just fine on a Type R, and it does make power all the time. Properly setup between 210-230whp is a good result. I've installed 30 JRSC kits and they are very functional, especially for first time FI guys. It's maintenence free with no danger of overboosting and no oiling concerns. The two biggest problems with Turbo-charging. It won't make the power that a turbo can, but not everyone has to have it. A good JRSC car does better at autoXing due to its ability to quickly and accurately modulate boost with throttle input and absolutely no lag. It is a solid choice for 50-70whp and lots of low end grunt.
Thanks for the reply...That's pretty much what i thought...I don't need a 300whp drag car, i'd be happy with 230....
Old 10-24-2002, 01:05 PM
  #9  
 
Licensed2Spool's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Westerville, Ohio, US
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

My friend had one on his type r, but he sold it because it only brought him down from a 14.7 to a 14.5...and it was dyno tuned. Now hes going all motor with a jun stage 3 package. I would go all motor or turbo before going with a jrsc.
Old 10-24-2002, 01:14 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Elite Hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Redskin Park, VA
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Licensed2Spool)

Yah I would go the all motor route before I went with a JRSC. Just go turbo man you would be a lot cooler. BTW that isnt your car in your avatar is it? It looks alot like my friend Andy's car that was in SCC.
Old 10-24-2002, 01:15 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Type-ARR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

Thanks for the reply...That's pretty much what i thought...I don't need a 300whp drag car, i'd be happy with 230....
I would **** my pants if you made 230 @ 5.5 psi, the fact is you wont, expext about 190-210 from what I have seen and prepare to get owned by allmotor cars with the same power.....
Old 10-24-2002, 01:45 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HybridKOOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Northeast, USA
Posts: 6,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Type-ARR)

I would **** my pants if you made 230 @ 5.5 psi, the fact is you wont, expext about 190-210 from what I have seen and prepare to get owned by allmotor cars with the same power.....
Old 10-24-2002, 01:56 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Speedworks801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: N Ogden, UT, USA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Type-ARR)

Thanks for the reply...That's pretty much what i thought...I don't need a 300whp drag car, i'd be happy with 230....


I would **** my pants if you made 230 @ 5.5 psi, the fact is you wont, expext about 190-210 from what I have seen and prepare to get owned by allmotor cars with the same power.....
The original post says 210-230, we've made 250whp on a GSR.

I've seen $10k Jun cars make 197whp
Old 10-24-2002, 03:18 PM
  #14  
New User
 
Double 06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Augusta, GA, US of A
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Speedworks801)

speaking from experience.

You will spend just as much money on a SC type R, than a turbo Type R. (this being mildly modified) no internal engine work.

I sold my charger for a turbo.

I was somewhat stock.

Mods, JRSC, JR intake, JR Map Controller, JR BTC,vafc ANd many many hours on the dyno and never hitting 200WHP.

A GSR on the other hand will definetly hit over 210 stock with just a charger.

I always heard it was the C5's ecu. I do not have dyno charts anymore, but
1. 187WHP
2. 170 timing problems
3. 194whp after spending all the money on JR's goodies.
Old 10-24-2002, 03:34 PM
  #15  
R59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ct.
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Double 06)

Well we'll see i guess because i'm getting it done soon..After it is dynoed i'm willing to bet i make over 210...Anyone wanna bet..I'll post the dyno too....
Old 10-24-2002, 05:04 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
SuperTeg95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spartanburg, sc, us
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

There's a guy on Hostboard(Rboosted717,I think), who makes 260hp on 8-9psi. He has a obd1 GSR(p72)ecu and EFI PMS. He also runs 12.60's in 1/4mi @110mph. I have a GSR and I made 227 @6psi and now I'm at 10psi and probably got about 260ish. As far as the R's go you gotta know what your doing when it comes to tuning them. I would take the Type R ecu and throw it as far from the car as you can throw and put in the p72. You'll make WAAAY more power that way. It's a waste of time tuning it with the Type R ecu. THey run REALLY rich up top and they don't like mods too much. Good luck
Old 10-24-2002, 06:52 PM
  #17  
R59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
R59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ct.
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (SuperTeg95)

I think my 97 has OBD 1 though...
Old 10-24-2002, 06:57 PM
  #18  
AL
New User
 
AL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: SC, United States
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (SuperTeg95)

There's a guy on Hostboard(Rboosted717,I think), who makes 260hp on 8-9psi. He has a obd1 GSR(p72)ecu and EFI PMS. He also runs 12.60's in 1/4mi @110mph. I have a GSR and I made 227 @6psi and now I'm at 10psi and probably got about 260ish. As far as the R's go you gotta know what your doing when it comes to tuning them. I would take the Type R ecu and throw it as far from the car as you can throw and put in the p72. You'll make WAAAY more power that way. It's a waste of time tuning it with the Type R ecu. THey run REALLY rich up top and they don't like mods too much. Good luck
Yup I found that out myself> used a p72 and at 6.5psi I hit 227/161. Fact is its all about the tuning. Mike (Rboosted717) made his first dyno pass for about 180hp. Now he has a custom chipped p28 with the numbers stated above 260whp/170.
Old 10-24-2002, 07:15 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Type-ARR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Speedworks801)

Thanks for the reply...That's pretty much what i thought...I don't need a 300whp drag car, i'd be happy with 230....


I would **** my pants if you made 230 @ 5.5 psi, the fact is you wont, expext about 190-210 from what I have seen and prepare to get owned by allmotor cars with the same power.....

The original post says 210-230, we've made 250whp on a GSR.

I've seen $10k Jun cars make 197whp

WOW good for you, but that still doesent change the fact that a turbo car at that same amount of work would be over 300 whp...............
Old 10-28-2002, 09:56 AM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Speedworks801's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: N Ogden, UT, USA
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Type-ARR)

Please read the whole thread
Old 10-28-2002, 10:15 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
illi Adik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Frederick
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (R59)

People always knock the jackson's. A properly tuned Jackson will run excellent, so what if it doesnt make 300hp at the wheels, that is peak regardless. The flat torque curve is unbeatable and the amount of rpm's over 200hp is nice as well. JRSC powerband is completley different, I wouldnt say any setup is better over the other, it is whatever you want to do. The JRSC is in no way shape or form a waste, Im looking for high 12's on slicks this spring after some fall Hondata tuning.
Old 10-28-2002, 10:38 AM
  #22  
Better than steak
 
Arturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 16,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (SuperTeg95)

There's a guy on Hostboard(Rboosted717,I think), who makes 260hp on 8-9psi. He has a obd1 GSR(p72)ecu and EFI PMS. He also runs 12.60's in 1/4mi @110mph. I have a GSR and I made 227 @6psi and now I'm at 10psi and probably got about 260ish. As far as the R's go you gotta know what your doing when it comes to tuning them. I would take the Type R ecu and throw it as far from the car as you can throw and put in the p72. You'll make WAAAY more power that way. It's a waste of time tuning it with the Type R ecu. THey run REALLY rich up top and they don't like mods too much. Good luck
Yes he did make those #'s. I dont know the truth to this, but I heard he blew his motor. I think he would be the best to answer this. And the people who told me this are people in the bay area. But I think the best person would be to ask him.

art
Old 10-28-2002, 12:26 PM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Anyotherone's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Arturbo)

Is anyone running a JRSC on a 2 liter b-series? I'm thinking about resleeving to 84mm.
Old 10-28-2002, 01:00 PM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
 
01ITR#700's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: CO, USA
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Anyotherone)

Talk to that Rboosted guy as well as newt2 on this board. Those are two of the JRSC'd R on the board that will give you good 1st had opinions on it and info.
HTH
M
Old 10-28-2002, 01:30 PM
  #25  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Captain Save-a-Hoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A town near you
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5 (Anyotherone)

Is anyone running a JRSC on a 2 liter b-series? I'm thinking about resleeving to 84mm.
there a guy on hostboard that has a jrsc 2 liter. His name is boosted ex.
http://www.hostboard.com/cgi-bin/ult...&f=110&t=10803


Quick Reply: Is the JRSC really that bad for B18c5



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 PM.