JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box
03-01-2008, 07:43 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box
ok ive got a question about 2 different intakes for the Jackson. What do you think would be more favorabe on a gsr at 6psi???
A CAI or a Stock integra air box convertered into an ice box??? do you think it would be more responsive and more gains with the ice box? or with the CAI. Idk if the stock box converted would be a lil restrictive for the blower as the CAI is not restrictive at all. but im not sure
Let me get your opinons on this and which to choose thanks guys/
A CAI or a Stock integra air box convertered into an ice box??? do you think it would be more responsive and more gains with the ice box? or with the CAI. Idk if the stock box converted would be a lil restrictive for the blower as the CAI is not restrictive at all. but im not sure
Let me get your opinons on this and which to choose thanks guys/
03-04-2008, 08:11 AM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: F Theives, USA
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have an ice box, seems very restrictive with the box sealed, i just take the cover off if its not too hot outside. MUCH faster with it off, and much better top end.
03-04-2008, 03:11 PM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Re: JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box (vtecman)
I used a CAI with my JRSC until this happened:
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
Trending Topics
03-04-2008, 06:57 PM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: GTA Ontario.
Posts: 3,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I used a CAI with my JRSC until this happened:
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Most understand that our cars are not amphibious vehicles.
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Most understand that our cars are not amphibious vehicles.
03-05-2008, 08:45 AM
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Centerville, OHIO, America
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ultraspeed DC2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ultraspeed DC2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have an ice box, seems very restrictive with the box sealed, i just take the cover off if its not too hot outside. MUCH faster with it off, and much better top end.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The 2 or 3 hp gain that you would get from removing that cover would not make your car MUCH faster.
The 2 or 3 hp gain that you would get from removing that cover would not make your car MUCH faster.
03-05-2008, 09:01 AM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, SC, UNITED STATES
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I used a CAI with my JRSC until this happened:
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
should have ran a bypass for the CAI
Noiw I use a short ram, I've decided that 3-6 extra WHP isn't worth it.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
should have ran a bypass for the CAI
03-05-2008, 09:18 AM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Re: JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box (HamiltonRex)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HamiltonRex »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Most understand that our cars are not amphibious vehicles. </TD></TR></TABLE>
If you were there under the same circumstances, the same thing would have happened to you.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bigbadboy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">should have ran a bypass for the CAI</TD></TR></TABLE>
I've seen too many of those leak on SC'd cars. They also disrupt the flow and do more harm than good. Like I said, the extra 3-6 WHP isn't worth the hassle.
If you were there under the same circumstances, the same thing would have happened to you.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bigbadboy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">should have ran a bypass for the CAI</TD></TR></TABLE>
I've seen too many of those leak on SC'd cars. They also disrupt the flow and do more harm than good. Like I said, the extra 3-6 WHP isn't worth the hassle.
03-05-2008, 07:09 PM
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: GTA Ontario.
Posts: 3,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: JRSC and CAI vs ICE Box (rmcdaniels)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Like I said, the extra 3-6 WHP isn't worth the hassle.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Depends on what youve got to work with, beings its a engine with a JRSC not a whole lot to begin with lol
Depends on what youve got to work with, beings its a engine with a JRSC not a whole lot to begin with lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
