I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSP
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Can someone post a video or sound clip of what a JRSC sounds like. Or I guess any supercharger for that matter.
#3
New User
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tampa, FL, USA
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (rjardy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rjardy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It sounds like an electric pencil sharpner on crack...</TD></TR></TABLE>
..being sucked up a vaccum cleaner at the same time.
..being sucked up a vaccum cleaner at the same time.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: www.js-garage.com
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (intekragsr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by intekragsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">to me, it sounds like the reverse gear on most hondas, on crank </TD></TR></TABLE>
exactly, no more vtec sound... just a loud WHINNNNN
exactly, no more vtec sound... just a loud WHINNNNN
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: bay area/socal, CA, USA
Posts: 3,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jackson4Door)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jackson4Door »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Only one of the best sounds in the world.</TD></TR></TABLE>
besides the sound of turbo spool.......
besides the sound of turbo spool.......
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
Shoot me an IM with an e-mail address and I will send you a video of a VSC pushing 350WHP.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Frederick
Posts: 4,132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (0x64)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 0x64 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Shoot me an IM with an e-mail address and I will send you a video of a VSC pushing 350WHP.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Vortec's sound different though, they almost sound like a chain.
Vortec's sound different though, they almost sound like a chain.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MachAF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Can someone post a video or sound clip of what a JRSC sounds like. Or I guess any supercharger for that matter.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought any supercharger would be good :shrugs:
I thought any supercharger would be good :shrugs:
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSP
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Jared)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jared »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It sounds like someone ready to get passed by a turbo car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol.. I don't have the time or money to go turbo.
lol.. I don't have the time or money to go turbo.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kills.
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MachAF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
lol.. I don't have the time or money to go turbo.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh, and the JR E-Z Bake Suppercharger is cheaper and/ or faster than a $1000 turbo setup running 5 PSI?
lol.. I don't have the time or money to go turbo.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh, and the JR E-Z Bake Suppercharger is cheaper and/ or faster than a $1000 turbo setup running 5 PSI?
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSP
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Loco Honkey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Loco Honkey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Oh, and the JR E-Z Bake Suppercharger is cheaper and/ or faster than a $1000 turbo setup running 5 PSI? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Notice I said time also. I don't have time or required tools to keep tweaking my car, and keep up on the maintanece a turbo requires.
Oh, and the JR E-Z Bake Suppercharger is cheaper and/ or faster than a $1000 turbo setup running 5 PSI? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Notice I said time also. I don't have time or required tools to keep tweaking my car, and keep up on the maintanece a turbo requires.
#16
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (GudeH23a)
Ugh. Here we go.
"Go turbo go turbo!" Where's Hypa with his "turbo monkey" attacks?
It sounds like a loud whine...like a blender, only higher and louder. WHeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
"Go turbo go turbo!" Where's Hypa with his "turbo monkey" attacks?
It sounds like a loud whine...like a blender, only higher and louder. WHeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: las vegas NV
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
like someone stated above. sounds like a honda in revese gear. but with a lil whine to it..
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Kills.
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MachAF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Notice I said time also. I don't have time or required tools to keep tweaking my car, and keep up on the maintanece a turbo requires. </TD></TR></TABLE>
A friend has a supercharged '91 Si hatch with a stock motor. I have a turbocharged 93' Si hatch with a stock motor. He runs 7 PSI all day. I run 10. I dropped my boost down to 6 PSI and still outran him in every gear. He's spent upwards of $3000 to make his supercharger work. I've spent within $100 either way of $1200 on my turbo. He has to deal with belt tension issues and no top end. I have to deal with waiting 'till 2700 RPM to see full boost (I see 5 PSI at 2000 RPM). He gets 30- 34 MPG. I get the same.
Want me to go on? If you have the money for a supercharger, you damn well have the money for a simple, low boost turbo setup that will be just as reliable as the supercharger and net you at least as much, if not more power. Don't have the time? Time for what? Buying the parts, or installing it? Installing a turbo is easier because it's all in front of you and not on the backside of the engine, and the only sensor you have to deal with is an O2 sensor, instead of all the sensors on the intake manifold. And what's this about required tools? I've never heard of 'em... can you explain to me how I got by without some turbo- specific tool kit?
Turbo maintenence: Check everything weekly for loose items (you'd do this with the supercharger, and it'd be harder to check these things because of the location of the blower). Change oil every 2500- 3000 miles, using a quality, name brand synthetic (Castrol GTX, Mobil1, ect) (as you should with the supercharger). Don't boost 'till your temp gauge is at normal operating temp (you'd have to follow this with the supercharger as well). Let it idle for ~30 seconds before you shut it off (OK, so you don't have to do this with the blower, but what's 30 seconds to you? Are you in that much of a rush?).
What's that? Mercedes, Pontiac, and Nissan sell supercharged cars, so that means superchargers are reliable? Well, Saab, Volvo, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Daihatsu, Isuzu, Mazda, Ford, Porsche, Ferrari, Chrysler and GM sell turbo cars with the same factory warranty as the NA cars have. And get this- most of 'em recommend 7500 mile oil changes, and mention nothing about synthetic oils or cool down or warm up periods in their owners manuals! How's THAT for reliability?
I'm really tired of the uneducated people saying turbos are high maintenence, that they're hard to install, whaa whaa whaa. Now, when I say uneducated, I don't mean dumb, but rather someone who's not done their homework on the subject. But I digress... It has been proven (PROVEN) time and time again that turbos are superior in every way, shape, and form, and that superchargers have no place being bolted to a four cylinder car. Every argument that the supercharger guys come up with has been soundly debunked by the turbo guys. And it's not just this board. Ask anyone who's serious about performance and knows anything about the physics of engines, and they'll tell you- you cannot go wrong with a turbo.
Notice I said time also. I don't have time or required tools to keep tweaking my car, and keep up on the maintanece a turbo requires. </TD></TR></TABLE>
A friend has a supercharged '91 Si hatch with a stock motor. I have a turbocharged 93' Si hatch with a stock motor. He runs 7 PSI all day. I run 10. I dropped my boost down to 6 PSI and still outran him in every gear. He's spent upwards of $3000 to make his supercharger work. I've spent within $100 either way of $1200 on my turbo. He has to deal with belt tension issues and no top end. I have to deal with waiting 'till 2700 RPM to see full boost (I see 5 PSI at 2000 RPM). He gets 30- 34 MPG. I get the same.
Want me to go on? If you have the money for a supercharger, you damn well have the money for a simple, low boost turbo setup that will be just as reliable as the supercharger and net you at least as much, if not more power. Don't have the time? Time for what? Buying the parts, or installing it? Installing a turbo is easier because it's all in front of you and not on the backside of the engine, and the only sensor you have to deal with is an O2 sensor, instead of all the sensors on the intake manifold. And what's this about required tools? I've never heard of 'em... can you explain to me how I got by without some turbo- specific tool kit?
Turbo maintenence: Check everything weekly for loose items (you'd do this with the supercharger, and it'd be harder to check these things because of the location of the blower). Change oil every 2500- 3000 miles, using a quality, name brand synthetic (Castrol GTX, Mobil1, ect) (as you should with the supercharger). Don't boost 'till your temp gauge is at normal operating temp (you'd have to follow this with the supercharger as well). Let it idle for ~30 seconds before you shut it off (OK, so you don't have to do this with the blower, but what's 30 seconds to you? Are you in that much of a rush?).
What's that? Mercedes, Pontiac, and Nissan sell supercharged cars, so that means superchargers are reliable? Well, Saab, Volvo, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Daihatsu, Isuzu, Mazda, Ford, Porsche, Ferrari, Chrysler and GM sell turbo cars with the same factory warranty as the NA cars have. And get this- most of 'em recommend 7500 mile oil changes, and mention nothing about synthetic oils or cool down or warm up periods in their owners manuals! How's THAT for reliability?
I'm really tired of the uneducated people saying turbos are high maintenence, that they're hard to install, whaa whaa whaa. Now, when I say uneducated, I don't mean dumb, but rather someone who's not done their homework on the subject. But I digress... It has been proven (PROVEN) time and time again that turbos are superior in every way, shape, and form, and that superchargers have no place being bolted to a four cylinder car. Every argument that the supercharger guys come up with has been soundly debunked by the turbo guys. And it's not just this board. Ask anyone who's serious about performance and knows anything about the physics of engines, and they'll tell you- you cannot go wrong with a turbo.
#22
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
Personally I say go turbo for a major and yet simple reason. WE AS PEOPLE ARE GREEDY. A supercharger doesn't leave room for this. Turbo does. As well as superchargers have heat issues. Yes, I know, so do turbos. However, a turbo can use an intercooler where as a JRSC kit cannot. By the way, I just sold my jackson kit . I was running 9psi and still not coming near to the numbers that a turbo kit can with same boost. Granted this is in AZ with crappy gas. Good luck though. To answer your question though, go race a grand prix GTP. Same noise. Goodluck.
#23
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (MachAF)
I uploaded a few short videos to we-todd-did-racing. I hope these work. Right click and save target as.
Silver Canadian SiR with JRSC
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Si vs. EXTREME pickup truck - funny
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Si 20-80mph
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Prelude on highway
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
Silver Canadian SiR with JRSC
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Si vs. EXTREME pickup truck - funny
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Si 20-80mph
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
JRSC Prelude on highway
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....3D%3D
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSP
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Loco Honkey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Loco Honkey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
A friend has a supercharged '91 Si hatch with a stock motor. I have a turbocharged 93' Si hatch with a stock motor. He runs 7 PSI all day. I run 10. I dropped my boost down to 6 PSI and still outran him in every gear. He's spent upwards of $3000 to make his supercharger work. I've spent within $100 either way of $1200 on my turbo. He has to deal with belt tension issues and no top end. I have to deal with waiting 'till 2700 RPM to see full boost (I see 5 PSI at 2000 RPM). He gets 30- 34 MPG. I get the same.
Want me to go on? If you have the money for a supercharger, you damn well have the money for a simple, low boost turbo setup that will be just as reliable as the supercharger and net you at least as much, if not more power. Don't have the time? Time for what? Buying the parts, or installing it? Installing a turbo is easier because it's all in front of you and not on the backside of the engine, and the only sensor you have to deal with is an O2 sensor, instead of all the sensors on the intake manifold. And what's this about required tools? I've never heard of 'em... can you explain to me how I got by without some turbo- specific tool kit?
Turbo maintenence: Check everything weekly for loose items (you'd do this with the supercharger, and it'd be harder to check these things because of the location of the blower). Change oil every 2500- 3000 miles, using a quality, name brand synthetic (Castrol GTX, Mobil1, ect) (as you should with the supercharger). Don't boost 'till your temp gauge is at normal operating temp (you'd have to follow this with the supercharger as well). Let it idle for ~30 seconds before you shut it off (OK, so you don't have to do this with the blower, but what's 30 seconds to you? Are you in that much of a rush?).
What's that? Mercedes, Pontiac, and Nissan sell supercharged cars, so that means superchargers are reliable? Well, Saab, Volvo, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Daihatsu, Isuzu, Mazda, Ford, Porsche, Ferrari, Chrysler and GM sell turbo cars with the same factory warranty as the NA cars have. And get this- most of 'em recommend 7500 mile oil changes, and mention nothing about synthetic oils or cool down or warm up periods in their owners manuals! How's THAT for reliability?
I'm really tired of the uneducated people saying turbos are high maintenence, that they're hard to install, whaa whaa whaa. Now, when I say uneducated, I don't mean dumb, but rather someone who's not done their homework on the subject. But I digress... It has been proven (PROVEN) time and time again that turbos are superior in every way, shape, and form, and that superchargers have no place being bolted to a four cylinder car. Every argument that the supercharger guys come up with has been soundly debunked by the turbo guys. And it's not just this board. Ask anyone who's serious about performance and knows anything about the physics of engines, and they'll tell you- you cannot go wrong with a turbo.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Whatever you just said i dunno, I don't feel like reading it all. As for being uneducated about turbos/supercharger, I think I've done my fair share research while I've been here on HT. As well as owned turbo vehciles, I think I have enough knowledge to make my decision. Keep on preaching turbo. When I was uneducated like yourself I use to be on the turbo bandwagon. Give yourself a few years and you'll see. For some of us who go through strict emissions there is this thing called CARB exempt.
And what turbo CAR has honda made besides their new turbo jetski motor?
286WHP and 212TQ @8psi with JRSC sounds good enough for me.
A friend has a supercharged '91 Si hatch with a stock motor. I have a turbocharged 93' Si hatch with a stock motor. He runs 7 PSI all day. I run 10. I dropped my boost down to 6 PSI and still outran him in every gear. He's spent upwards of $3000 to make his supercharger work. I've spent within $100 either way of $1200 on my turbo. He has to deal with belt tension issues and no top end. I have to deal with waiting 'till 2700 RPM to see full boost (I see 5 PSI at 2000 RPM). He gets 30- 34 MPG. I get the same.
Want me to go on? If you have the money for a supercharger, you damn well have the money for a simple, low boost turbo setup that will be just as reliable as the supercharger and net you at least as much, if not more power. Don't have the time? Time for what? Buying the parts, or installing it? Installing a turbo is easier because it's all in front of you and not on the backside of the engine, and the only sensor you have to deal with is an O2 sensor, instead of all the sensors on the intake manifold. And what's this about required tools? I've never heard of 'em... can you explain to me how I got by without some turbo- specific tool kit?
Turbo maintenence: Check everything weekly for loose items (you'd do this with the supercharger, and it'd be harder to check these things because of the location of the blower). Change oil every 2500- 3000 miles, using a quality, name brand synthetic (Castrol GTX, Mobil1, ect) (as you should with the supercharger). Don't boost 'till your temp gauge is at normal operating temp (you'd have to follow this with the supercharger as well). Let it idle for ~30 seconds before you shut it off (OK, so you don't have to do this with the blower, but what's 30 seconds to you? Are you in that much of a rush?).
What's that? Mercedes, Pontiac, and Nissan sell supercharged cars, so that means superchargers are reliable? Well, Saab, Volvo, Honda, Nissan, Toyota, Mitsubishi, Subaru, Daihatsu, Isuzu, Mazda, Ford, Porsche, Ferrari, Chrysler and GM sell turbo cars with the same factory warranty as the NA cars have. And get this- most of 'em recommend 7500 mile oil changes, and mention nothing about synthetic oils or cool down or warm up periods in their owners manuals! How's THAT for reliability?
I'm really tired of the uneducated people saying turbos are high maintenence, that they're hard to install, whaa whaa whaa. Now, when I say uneducated, I don't mean dumb, but rather someone who's not done their homework on the subject. But I digress... It has been proven (PROVEN) time and time again that turbos are superior in every way, shape, and form, and that superchargers have no place being bolted to a four cylinder car. Every argument that the supercharger guys come up with has been soundly debunked by the turbo guys. And it's not just this board. Ask anyone who's serious about performance and knows anything about the physics of engines, and they'll tell you- you cannot go wrong with a turbo.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Whatever you just said i dunno, I don't feel like reading it all. As for being uneducated about turbos/supercharger, I think I've done my fair share research while I've been here on HT. As well as owned turbo vehciles, I think I have enough knowledge to make my decision. Keep on preaching turbo. When I was uneducated like yourself I use to be on the turbo bandwagon. Give yourself a few years and you'll see. For some of us who go through strict emissions there is this thing called CARB exempt.
And what turbo CAR has honda made besides their new turbo jetski motor?
286WHP and 212TQ @8psi with JRSC sounds good enough for me.
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: MSP
Posts: 2,477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: I WANNA hear what A JRSC SOUNDS like!!!!!!!!!!!!! (Evil Beaver)
Thx for the videos Beaver!!
And WTF. I asked for video you fools. Everytime JRSC is mentioned you tools have to come in and start toolin around trying to agrue about turbo ****..
And WTF. I asked for video you fools. Everytime JRSC is mentioned you tools have to come in and start toolin around trying to agrue about turbo ****..