holset hx35...
i have seen a topic on it, but has anyone had some true experience with it? i have heard (and seen) that it is a beast of a turbo. so does anyone have any stories to share about it?
edit: oh, and what would you guys think about it being on a b18b non-vtec...
edit: oh, and what would you guys think about it being on a b18b non-vtec...
I'm not 100% sure but I did some reading and it seems to me like it's a nice alternative to a SC61 or something of that size. I don't think it's ball bearing but supposidly it was a cost effective alternative to make big power.
V-tech? do you mean vtec??
just wondering...
yea, i have heard that the holset turbos put out amazing power. i was just wondering how it runs on a b18b at about 10 psi or so. there is someone who wants to trade me his teg that has an hx35 on it, and i was just wondering since it seems like a bit of a mystery to most...
just wondering...yea, i have heard that the holset turbos put out amazing power. i was just wondering how it runs on a b18b at about 10 psi or so. there is someone who wants to trade me his teg that has an hx35 on it, and i was just wondering since it seems like a bit of a mystery to most...
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ej6andslow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he and Speed PHreak are both running the HX35w
the only problem is that they are high boost turbos that like to be run at high boost all the time
they have similar specs to a 60-1 though, with a decent wheel
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wrong on all three counts! You, Mister Deal, are a ******* moron.
he and Speed PHreak are both running the HX35w
the only problem is that they are high boost turbos that like to be run at high boost all the time
they have similar specs to a 60-1 though, with a decent wheel
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Wrong on all three counts! You, Mister Deal, are a ******* moron.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ej6andslow »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ok, you and Steven are both in the PROCESS OF RUNNING THEM</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, they don't fit anywhere on B-swapped ED chassis without some frame alteration... maybe the "EF" chassis ******s will have tons of underhood room with them; the sort of people who call an 88-91 USDM Civic/CRX an EF have all sorts of stupid delusions.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you said it was not meant for low boost, or was that steven?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No, and Dick never said anything of the sort either. It's much more efficient than a 60-1 compressor at low boost, and much more efficient the rest of the map to boot... haven't you ever looked at one of their compressor maps? Or do you still not know how to read a compressor map, Mister I Trashed A Cherry ITR Swapped Civic Body/Engine/Transmission In Under Five Months Due To Ignorance? You can fit an entire T04B compressor map, and a very large portion of a 60-1's compressor map, inside the 70% efficiency island.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and you said it was a similar spec to the 60-1</TD></TR></TABLE>
If anything I compared it to the SC61, but the turbine housing is A) smaller and B) of a much more modern design than the SC61. After spending the night before Hyundaidata seminar @ Mark Pikas' (Holset + F-body DIY guru) house, I'd have to say the figures I've given in the past for the turbine AR are wacked. What they measure to and what they actually are is completely different, you have to physically measure the turbine housing volume, which is something I haven't had the time to do yet.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">YOU are the ******* moron, moron
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You've done your weaksauce internet research, time to pick up a set of wrenches and actually learn something real about the cars you profess to know something about.
Yeah, they don't fit anywhere on B-swapped ED chassis without some frame alteration... maybe the "EF" chassis ******s will have tons of underhood room with them; the sort of people who call an 88-91 USDM Civic/CRX an EF have all sorts of stupid delusions.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you said it was not meant for low boost, or was that steven?</TD></TR></TABLE>
No, and Dick never said anything of the sort either. It's much more efficient than a 60-1 compressor at low boost, and much more efficient the rest of the map to boot... haven't you ever looked at one of their compressor maps? Or do you still not know how to read a compressor map, Mister I Trashed A Cherry ITR Swapped Civic Body/Engine/Transmission In Under Five Months Due To Ignorance? You can fit an entire T04B compressor map, and a very large portion of a 60-1's compressor map, inside the 70% efficiency island.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and you said it was a similar spec to the 60-1</TD></TR></TABLE>
If anything I compared it to the SC61, but the turbine housing is A) smaller and B) of a much more modern design than the SC61. After spending the night before Hyundaidata seminar @ Mark Pikas' (Holset + F-body DIY guru) house, I'd have to say the figures I've given in the past for the turbine AR are wacked. What they measure to and what they actually are is completely different, you have to physically measure the turbine housing volume, which is something I haven't had the time to do yet.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">YOU are the ******* moron, moron
</TD></TR></TABLE>You've done your weaksauce internet research, time to pick up a set of wrenches and actually learn something real about the cars you profess to know something about.
Sorry to bring this one back from over 3 weeks ago, but I just wanted to say that I am now running an HX35 on my stock b16 @ 6 psi. I hope to have dyno numbers in a few weeks. Runs great, spool is between 4-5, kinda inconsistent.
The spool is load dependant, and you'll find the spool time in second higher than the spool time in third. There's a bit of lag in such a combo.
What chassis you stick it in, what manifold, and where are your pics?
...just for giggles, steven's engine:


My Holset, drinking Gatorade:

My Holset, intimidating lesser T3/T04E:

My Holset, manifold:
What chassis you stick it in, what manifold, and where are your pics?
...just for giggles, steven's engine:


My Holset, drinking Gatorade:

My Holset, intimidating lesser T3/T04E:

My Holset, manifold:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by project dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">j davis .. you really runnin an ssautochrome mani ? </TD></TR></TABLE>
you may have missed the part wehre it says 'steven's engine'.
you may have missed the part wehre it says 'steven's engine'.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by project dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">j davis .. you really runnin an ssautochrome mani ? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Uh...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J. Davis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My Holset, manifold:
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's right, a pointless schedule 40 heatsink. The bitch gets headerwrap in an attempt to increase it's poor thermal efficiency once I have it installed on the car. The nice collector transition may bump power enough for some, but I prefer to address all engineering aspects in my setup. I wish the thing had been made out of thin wall 321SS, it would bypass the thermal inefficiency issue.
Uh...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J. Davis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My Holset, manifold:
</TD></TR></TABLE>That's right, a pointless schedule 40 heatsink. The bitch gets headerwrap in an attempt to increase it's poor thermal efficiency once I have it installed on the car. The nice collector transition may bump power enough for some, but I prefer to address all engineering aspects in my setup. I wish the thing had been made out of thin wall 321SS, it would bypass the thermal inefficiency issue.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J. Davis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yeah, they don't fit anywhere on B-swapped ED chassis without some frame alteration... maybe the "EF" chassis ******s will have tons of underhood room with them; the sort of people who call an 88-91 USDM Civic/CRX an EF have all sorts of stupid delusions.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
**** you *** hole...
I agree about the US "EDs" calling them selves "EFs" however.
The JimFab Crossmemeber does wonders for clearance btw.
Yeah, they don't fit anywhere on B-swapped ED chassis without some frame alteration... maybe the "EF" chassis ******s will have tons of underhood room with them; the sort of people who call an 88-91 USDM Civic/CRX an EF have all sorts of stupid delusions.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
**** you *** hole...
I agree about the US "EDs" calling them selves "EFs" however.
The JimFab Crossmemeber does wonders for clearance btw.






