gt45 to big??
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: everett, wa, united states
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
gt45 to big??
hello,
I bored out my b16a2 si block to 1.97l and thought that after I put the darten turbo sleeves and crower rods and je turbo pistons(built for 40lbs of boost) that bigger would be better. note that the head was fully built to handle the power also.
So I chucked the t3 t40E hybrid turbo charger and put a t70 turbo charger on not realizing that it was for at least a 2.5l motor. after i had the motor tuned with the t70 the tune shop thought it would be wise to tell me the turbo was to big after tuning, instead of before tuning, that it was not spooling up until 6000rpms and that i would be better off with a gt40 or even a gt45 turbo charger.
I purchased a gt45 and it is massive? was I miss informed? is there somthing that I'm not aware of like the inside of the turbo hosing, because this turbo housing and exhaust side is bigger than the t70's.
man i'm confused....
I bored out my b16a2 si block to 1.97l and thought that after I put the darten turbo sleeves and crower rods and je turbo pistons(built for 40lbs of boost) that bigger would be better. note that the head was fully built to handle the power also.
So I chucked the t3 t40E hybrid turbo charger and put a t70 turbo charger on not realizing that it was for at least a 2.5l motor. after i had the motor tuned with the t70 the tune shop thought it would be wise to tell me the turbo was to big after tuning, instead of before tuning, that it was not spooling up until 6000rpms and that i would be better off with a gt40 or even a gt45 turbo charger.
I purchased a gt45 and it is massive? was I miss informed? is there somthing that I'm not aware of like the inside of the turbo hosing, because this turbo housing and exhaust side is bigger than the t70's.
man i'm confused....
Last edited by sevenj; 02-23-2009 at 07:28 PM. Reason: mispell
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: everett, wa, united states
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt45 to big??
only 388hp. the tuner shop said with the gt45 i would make 500hp and that i would spool faster at lower rpms but its hard for me to believe with this massive gt45?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt45 to big??
lol, didnt you even look at the specs of the turbo before you bought it? A GT45 is a 1000+hp turbo, do you even have a T4 manifold?
A GT45 is a rather beefy turbo upgrade for a Supra, and rather unimaginable for your Honda, I would find another tuner asap....
I am assuming your T70 was an EGAY I mean EBAY turbo?
A GT45 is a rather beefy turbo upgrade for a Supra, and rather unimaginable for your Honda, I would find another tuner asap....
I am assuming your T70 was an EGAY I mean EBAY turbo?
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Re: gt45 to big??
Hehe. I hate to say it, but I think he was joking to see if you'd buy it. Your engine will not move that turbo if there were 3 b16s attached to it. I'd really stop listening to this person. He has just made you waste money on a bad joke.. Honestly.
Last edited by TheShodan; 02-23-2009 at 08:20 PM.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: gt45 to big??
ahah this is to rich of a thread.. you gotta be kidding you actually bought a GT45 for an sir ? your out of ur mind. im sure your car wont even start with it on cuz you wont have enuff pressure to turn it
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chicago, Il.
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
#19
Man U FTW
Re: gt45 to big??
If i'm not mistaken, i think you have your answer. If you have a question regarding a proper turbo for your setup, please start a new thread. This one is fairly tainted with the blatant ignorance of your "tuner."
**Just to reiterate, don't ever listen to that person again...thanks**
**Just to reiterate, don't ever listen to that person again...thanks**
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
street_ride14
Forced Induction
7
06-21-2008 09:27 PM