fpr's: b&m VS AEM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:25 PM
  #1  
ceemarun's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: ca, 95064
Default fpr's: b&m VS AEM

you always get what you pay for, and the AEM, price-wise, beats the b&m, but how much advantage does it offer at $100 extra? any people w/ experience w/ the b&m tell me whats wrong w/ it? im gonna be running a standalone w/ a 255lph intank, 450 dsm's. thanks.

Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:36 PM
  #2  
Mr. Softee's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,848
Likes: 0
From: Islip, CA, USA
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (ceemarun)

i like my b/m
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:50 PM
  #3  
Sonny's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,763
Likes: 2
From: Dark Aether
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (ceemarun)

The B&M is not an FPR. It is simply an adjustable top that you attach to to your stock FPR after you cut off the original top. It adds adjustability to the stock FPR, but you are still limited by the constraints of the stock FPR. Those constraints are:

1) Some stock FPR's do not increase fuel pressure under boost (see earlier discussion). That is fine and not really a problem unless you want to trade maps with someone or try someone else's map who does have an FPR that raises fuel pressure under boost.

2) The return orifice in the stock FPR is too small to handle the fuel delivered by aftermarket pumps at idle. As a result, your idle pressure will be too high (usually around 50 psi) and the only way to get it back down is to drill a relief hole in the FPR (which can cause other problems).

These characteristics of the stock FPR do not stop many people from using them. They work fine. However, since you are starting from scratch with a Hondata setup and you'll be borrowing a base map from someone (probably me), those constraints will keep you from being able to accurately use my map.

I know you're trying to cut some cost by not buying the AEM, but if you want to run my map, I will not give it to you if you don't have it (see my reasons why in the other post ). You may save $100 by not buying the AEM, but I guarantee you that you will spend that and then some on getting your part throttle maps tuned later.

Sonny


[Modified by Sonny, 7:51 PM 6/17/2002]
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 06:51 PM
  #4  
M.A.R.C.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (94goldjungsr)

i like my b/m
ditto... although i took mine off this weekend because i won't really need it for now
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
GruvyTune's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 1
From: NY, USA
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (CivicRyda2k)

I've got a B&M expertly attached to a stock regulator in excellent condition for sale. Works just fine.

email me if you are interested
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 07:15 PM
  #6  
ceemarun's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: ca, 95064
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (Sonny)

The B&M is not an FPR. It is simply an adjustable top that you attach to to your stock FPR after you cut off the original top. It adds adjustability to the stock FPR, but you are still limited by the constraints of the stock FPR. Those constraints are:

1) Some stock FPR's do not increase fuel pressure under boost (see earlier discussion). That is fine and not really a problem unless you want to trade maps with someone or try someone else's map who does have an FPR that raises fuel pressure under boost.

2) The return orifice in the stock FPR is too small to handle the fuel delivered by aftermarket pumps at idle. As a result, your idle pressure will be too high (usually around 50 psi) and the only way to get it back down is to drill a relief hole in the FPR (which can cause other problems).

These characteristics of the stock FPR do not stop many people from using them. They work fine. However, since you are starting from scratch with a Hondata setup and you'll be borrowing a base map from someone (probably me), those constraints will keep you from being able to accurately use my map.

I know you're trying to cut some cost by not buying the AEM, but if you want to run my map, I will not give it to you if you don't have it (see my reasons why in the other post ). You may save $100 by not buying the AEM, but I guarantee you that you will spend that and then some on getting your part throttle maps tuned later.

Sonny


[Modified by Sonny, 7:51 PM 6/17/2002]

aem it is

Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 08:08 PM
  #7  
M.A.R.C.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
From: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (Sonny)

The B&M is not an FPR. It is simply an adjustable top that you attach to to your stock FPR after you cut off the original top. It adds adjustability to the stock FPR, but you are still limited by the constraints of the stock FPR. Those constraints are:

1) Some stock FPR's do not increase fuel pressure under boost (see earlier discussion). That is fine and not really a problem unless you want to trade maps with someone or try someone else's map who does have an FPR that raises fuel pressure under boost.

I thought ALL stock FPRs didn't increase with boost.

2) The return orifice in the stock FPR is too small to handle the fuel delivered by aftermarket pumps at idle. As a result, your idle pressure will be too high (usually around 50 psi) and the only way to get it back down is to drill a relief hole in the FPR (which can cause other problems).

True dat

These characteristics of the stock FPR do not stop many people from using them. They work fine. However, since you are starting from scratch with a Hondata setup and you'll be borrowing a base map from someone (probably me), those constraints will keep you from being able to accurately use my map.

I know you're trying to cut some cost by not buying the AEM, but if you want to run my map, I will not give it to you if you don't have it (see my reasons why in the other post ). You may save $100 by not buying the AEM, but I guarantee you that you will spend that and then some on getting your part throttle maps tuned later.

True again


Sonny


[Modified by Sonny, 7:51 PM 6/17/2002]
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2002 | 08:22 PM
  #8  
ion_four's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (CivicRyda2k)

I've heard of people having problems with the AEM; I think the diaphragm in it fails, though it could be something else. I haven't had any problems with B&M, though. Is 25psi not a sufficient minimum to run 450's? Stock pressure is 30-35, is it not? So, you can lower it a bit, in addition to the fact that the hondata or VAFC are supposed to be able to use the stock fpr.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2002 | 03:52 AM
  #9  
GruvyTune's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 2,102
Likes: 1
From: NY, USA
Default Re: fpr's: b&m VS AEM (ion_four)

you can run 25psi but why? I couldnt get mine to go below 50psi static (WOT).
Seems if you go low in pressure your duty cycles go up. I have RC440s and my duty cycles never go above 70% at 10.5psi boost pressure.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
irishflame27
Forced Induction
15
Dec 9, 2008 06:14 PM
PickleTeg
Forced Induction
3
Jan 24, 2008 03:53 AM
94typeR
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Apr 9, 2007 10:58 AM
J.R.
Forced Induction
4
Mar 18, 2003 04:38 PM
HondaCutter
Tech / Misc
2
Dec 27, 2002 05:26 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:22 AM.