First Dyno ever
03-30-2005, 04:50 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, QC., Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First Dyno ever
This afternoon was my first dyno session. I need your thoughts. My setup is:
Drag mani
Turbo (GT3255E)
tial 38mm wastegate(8psi spring)
rc550's
Custom fmic
greddy type s bov
Hondata S200
drag ic piping
walbro 255 fuel pump
drag 2.5" dp
for now a stock itr exhaust
I made 242.0whp with 169.2ft/lbs @ 8psi
Tell me what you think.
Drag mani
Turbo (GT3255E)
tial 38mm wastegate(8psi spring)
rc550's
Custom fmic
greddy type s bov
Hondata S200
drag ic piping
walbro 255 fuel pump
drag 2.5" dp
for now a stock itr exhaust
I made 242.0whp with 169.2ft/lbs @ 8psi
Tell me what you think.
Trending Topics
03-30-2005, 05:13 PM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (95GSRT)
Yes. It's a great all around turbocharger that's not going to break the bank 
You can turn up the boost some more but I am sure you are happy with it as is. The exhaust, along with a couple other things, is hurting your torque and horsepower but as I said above you should be happy for now.
You can turn up the boost some more but I am sure you are happy with it as is. The exhaust, along with a couple other things, is hurting your torque and horsepower but as I said above you should be happy for now.
03-30-2005, 05:17 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, QC., Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I want to turn up the boost a bit I am looking for a 10psi spring right now. This dyno is a mustang dyno, and I heard that you have to add a bit more power to get the equivelancy of a dynojet. Is this true?
03-30-2005, 07:04 PM
#13
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: work
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Tapen00n)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tapen00n »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">torque is low because you have no cat, more flow means less backpressure</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, no. Backpressure has nothing to do with it, backpressure has nothing to do with it in an N/A car. If anything having no cat would make more torque, because the turbo would spool quicker.
lol, no. Backpressure has nothing to do with it, backpressure has nothing to do with it in an N/A car. If anything having no cat would make more torque, because the turbo would spool quicker.
03-30-2005, 07:23 PM
#14
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TurBo Valley, USA
Posts: 3,017
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (95GSRT)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 95GSRT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This afternoon was my first dyno session. I need your thoughts. My setup is:
Drag mani
Turbo (GT3255E)
tial 38mm wastegate(8psi spring)
rc550's
Custom fmic
greddy type s bov
Hondata S200
drag ic piping
walbro 255 fuel pump
drag 2.5" dp
for now a stock itr exhaust
I made 242.0whp with 169.2ft/lbs @ 8psi
Tell me what you think. </TD></TR></TABLE>
242hp at 8psi on a GSR motor is really low? If it's on a LS then that's about right
Drag mani
Turbo (GT3255E)
tial 38mm wastegate(8psi spring)
rc550's
Custom fmic
greddy type s bov
Hondata S200
drag ic piping
walbro 255 fuel pump
drag 2.5" dp
for now a stock itr exhaust
I made 242.0whp with 169.2ft/lbs @ 8psi
Tell me what you think. </TD></TR></TABLE>
242hp at 8psi on a GSR motor is really low? If it's on a LS then that's about right
03-31-2005, 03:45 AM
#15
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, QC., Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (Mr.DC2TurBo)
My tuner said that if I ditch my piece of **** exhaust and put 3" piping it will be a dramatical increase in hp. he said around 10hp. as well it's on a conservative tune so the timing is not too advanced. He put it for a very streetable tune, not too aggressive. I'll go back with my new setup and then we will see.
03-31-2005, 08:06 AM
#17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, QC., Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (Benjithx)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Benjithx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you only had a stronger block......
sorry, I am itching for an STI</TD></TR></TABLE>
Funny. I'll just mess around with this one till she blows and then buy a built block. Dont worry Benjithx you'll sell it, There are plenty of people who need a sleeved block.
sorry, I am itching for an STI</TD></TR></TABLE>
Funny. I'll just mess around with this one till she blows and then buy a built block. Dont worry Benjithx you'll sell it, There are plenty of people who need a sleeved block.
03-31-2005, 08:35 AM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (Mr.DC2TurBo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr.DC2TurBo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
242hp at 8psi on a GSR motor is really low? If it's on a LS then that's about right </TD></TR></TABLE>
242hp @ 8psi on a GSR is not low on a Mustang Dyno.
242hp at 8psi on a GSR motor is really low? If it's on a LS then that's about right
</TD></TR></TABLE>242hp @ 8psi on a GSR is not low on a Mustang Dyno.
03-31-2005, 08:55 AM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC bitchessss
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (oxSLEEPERxo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by oxSLEEPERxo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you might free up some more hp if you get a better exhaust. Was that dyno with a stock catylac convertor?</TD></TR></TABLE>
might? WTF....that right there would be like a 20whp gain.....
Awsome man...
But I'm also betting money that you don't see 8si by 3000rpm's with that exhaust and 2.5" Downpipe......
might? WTF....that right there would be like a 20whp gain.....
Awsome man...
But I'm also betting money that you don't see 8si by 3000rpm's with that exhaust and 2.5" Downpipe......
03-31-2005, 09:09 AM
#21
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: manassas, va, manassas
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (m R g S r)
be carefu wid ur a/f ratio if u change the exh, if it makes a big difference flow wise and if it hurting u so much now, u can bet it will effect the a/f ratio dramatically.
-Toby
-Toby
03-31-2005, 10:18 AM
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ga
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: First Dyno ever (0x64)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 0x64 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes. It's a great all around turbocharger that's not going to break the bank You can turn up the boost some more but I am sure you are happy with it as is. The exhaust, along with a couple other things, is hurting your torque and horsepower but as I said above you should be happy for now.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Arent these turbos around 750.00 new?
You can turn up the boost some more but I am sure you are happy with it as is. The exhaust, along with a couple other things, is hurting your torque and horsepower but as I said above you should be happy for now.</TD></TR></TABLE>Arent these turbos around 750.00 new?
03-31-2005, 10:31 AM
#23
Join Date: May 2003
Location: las vegas, nv
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (95GSRT)
mustang dyno = 3-4 % less then dynojet
my dyno (b18c, eagle rods, stock comp je pistons, drag kit @ 10psi)
279 whp @ 7200 rpm
218 ft lbs @ 6800 rpm
best time so far is 11.7 @ 116 mph w/ my girlfriend in the car video tapping
the track is open tonight, hopfully better times today....
this is in a 89 crx si
(15 x 24.5 welds)
the car went 11.9 @ 113 w/ 8psi with the stock motor last year, finally blew after 2 years....
was only making 235 whp and 181 ft lbs on a dynojet ( rings were going)
my dyno (b18c, eagle rods, stock comp je pistons, drag kit @ 10psi)
279 whp @ 7200 rpm
218 ft lbs @ 6800 rpm
best time so far is 11.7 @ 116 mph w/ my girlfriend in the car video tapping
the track is open tonight, hopfully better times today....
this is in a 89 crx si
(15 x 24.5 welds)
the car went 11.9 @ 113 w/ 8psi with the stock motor last year, finally blew after 2 years....
was only making 235 whp and 181 ft lbs on a dynojet ( rings were going)
03-31-2005, 01:39 PM
#24
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Montreal, QC., Canada
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (TuRbO_CrX_7o2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by m R g S r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
But I'm also betting money that you don't see 8si by 3000rpm's with that exhaust and 2.5" Downpipe......</TD></TR></TABLE>
I will double check,
but I'm pretty sure it's not many more rpm if any.
But I'm also betting money that you don't see 8si by 3000rpm's with that exhaust and 2.5" Downpipe......</TD></TR></TABLE>
I will double check,
but I'm pretty sure it's not many more rpm if any.
03-31-2005, 02:08 PM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (TuRbO_CrX_7o2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TuRbO_CrX_7o2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">mustang dyno = 3-4 % less then dynojet</TD></TR></TABLE>
Mustang Dyno can do unloaded (Dyno Jet) numbers. I have found a 5% - 7% difference in power between loaded and unloaded pulls on a Mustang Dyno. It seems like people on here think Dyno Jet's are superior to Mustang Dyno's
Mustang Dyno can do unloaded (Dyno Jet) numbers. I have found a 5% - 7% difference in power between loaded and unloaded pulls on a Mustang Dyno. It seems like people on here think Dyno Jet's are superior to Mustang Dyno's