I think the hp you are at now is pretty good. Thats easy low 12 sec 1320's with drag radials. And 350 on stock isn't bad.

 

U do not need an exsternal fuel pump.

 

duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhh


Modified by G"UNIT at 3:44 PM 7/23/2004

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by G"UNIT &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">350 is good for stock.. </TD></TR></TABLE>

its not stock.

 

on ME...lol

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Liltrix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">IMO the CR 8.8:1 is a little on the low side - more boost = more heat, so now you are getting more heat and more lag, not so good; furthermore with that set up and the more boost you plan to run, you will need at least 720cc RCs. Hey guy do it properly from the beginning.

1. Sleve the block - it is great insurance.
2. You need 9.0:1 CR on those pistons - forget lag before high boost, you will loose the race as soon as it begins.
3. Get RCs 720 or even bigger.
4. Get an Aeromotive external pump and filter
5. Get proper tuning - you have a great stand alone.
look for about 475-525 WHP.
6. Have fun safely ie at the track.
7. Try to get 16" wheels the rolling radius helps

Colin</TD></TR></TABLE>


Show me your reasoning (Ie. dyno plots) that 8.8:1 compression is going to make a difference in turbo spool time.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MachAF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


Show me your reasoning (Ie. dyno plots) that 8.8:1 compression is going to make a difference in turbo spool time.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

As far as I know (and I dont know everything)higher compression helps boost response, I have seen that with my own set up, I actually went from a 8.8:1 to a 10.0:1 and I noticed an improvement in boost response. I do not have dyno plots to back up what I am saying, but if you are going to use dyno plots as the sole "measuring stick" then all other variables like the day's temp etc must be identical. I have felt a noticable difference with my car when I went up with higher compression. Furthermore, I was giving my own opinion, if you noticed the post it started with "IMO" plus thats not the only comment I made regarding the original post, I mentioned the injectors, fuel, sleeving, proper tuning, safety and 16" wheels.

 

You dont drag race? you do circuit then?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 9psiTurboSI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Why do I need 475-525hp when I don't drag race </TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 9psiTurboSI &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I went with 8.8:1cr for 2 reason... so I can run more boost safer and I it lags alittle but once at 4500rpm+ it just pulls like a bicth and even at 340hp on the street im not spinning tire like crazy 1st-3rd, but i dont race people on the streets, just on the track and on the track im always at high rpm so it works out good </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Maybe he doesn't want 525hp like everyone else?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Liltrix &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You dont drag race? you do circuit then?

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yea, I don't drag race... just auto-x and road race (circuit)

 

Looks good.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MachAF &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


Show me your reasoning (Ie. dyno plots) that 8.8:1 compression is going to make a difference in turbo spool time.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=922152

 

beautiful. wish my car had worked out well