fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how
03-23-2004, 06:30 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: oakland, ca, 94605
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how
as the title says. can someone gimme some insight thanks. and the search feature yeah yeah i tried it
03-23-2004, 06:35 PM
#2
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: W.A
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how (boostedcivichatchbacksi)
I've only used the fields sfc vtec controller and it was really easy to use. Pretty basic. I had a apex vafc , but sold it. I cant imagine the vafc being that hard to use because it's so popular.
I know the vafc can trim fuel 50% while the sfc can trim 30%.
The vafc has i believe 8 adjustable fuel points on the first version and 16 points of adjustment on the second version.
The sfc has 8 points of adjustment.
Both allow vtec to be moved.
I know the vafc can trim fuel 50% while the sfc can trim 30%.
The vafc has i believe 8 adjustable fuel points on the first version and 16 points of adjustment on the second version.
The sfc has 8 points of adjustment.
Both allow vtec to be moved.
03-23-2004, 06:37 PM
#3
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: W.A
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how (b16ahybrid)
Oh and btw I have a field unit for sale if your interested.
The field sfc is cheaper then the apex vafc.
I know the sfc displays rpm and has a light that goes on when vtec switches over. It also has speed readout on the screen
The field sfc is cheaper then the apex vafc.
I know the sfc displays rpm and has a light that goes on when vtec switches over. It also has speed readout on the screen
03-23-2004, 07:46 PM
#4
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 43257 Osgood Rd. Fremont, CA 94539
Posts: 45,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how (b16ahybrid)
just so you know fields fuel controlelr will not work for the afc hack, not enough adjustment.
03-23-2004, 07:54 PM
#5
Re: fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how (project dc2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by project dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just so you know fields fuel controlelr will not work for the afc hack, not enough adjustment. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yes it will
but u can only boost like 8 psi max
the engine will run pretty rich since u only taking out 30% off the MAP reading
Modified by USDM 4G VTEC at 12:07 AM 3/24/2004
yes it will
but u can only boost like 8 psi max
the engine will run pretty rich since u only taking out 30% off the MAP reading
Modified by USDM 4G VTEC at 12:07 AM 3/24/2004
03-23-2004, 07:59 PM
#6
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: W.A
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: fields vafc vs apexi, which costs more, which is better why what how (project dc2)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by project dc2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just so you know fields fuel controlelr will not work for the afc hack, not enough adjustment. </TD></TR></TABLE>
You just cant use 450cc injectors
it's possible but not as easy as it is with a vafc.
390's and raise the fp a little
You just cant use 450cc injectors
it's possible but not as easy as it is with a vafc.
390's and raise the fp a little
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post