fluidampr here and couldnt be more happy. I talked to arturbo and Tony1 before I bought it. arturbo sells them also

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ATI all the way, this is why:


http://www.laskeyracing.com/shop/harmonics.htm</TD></TR></TABLE>

..ATI

 

think im going to try the fluidampr. hope everything works out fine. not really worried about the heat cycles affecting the silicone more about what i read on the laskey site about it over 7k

 

ATI..all the way

 

Here's some fuel for the fire:

http://www.fluidampr.com/FACTS.htm

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ATI all the way, this is why:
http://www.laskeyracing.com/shop/harmonics.htm</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by taggart_lumpy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">more about what i read on the laskey site about it over 7k</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have always been disappointed with the actual info ATI provided to back up this so called "accurate" test. Fluidamper straight up said, if our parts are inferior, we want to make them better. Here are the results of Fluidampers tests. They actually explain exactly what they did to test the units, what all tests were run, how they were done, what tools were used during the tests and even where they were done. They also test a few different motors. I think there tests speak for themselves dont you?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by litovi3tboi503 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and it has been proven to work better than the fluidampr at higher rpm range where most hondas spend their life... </TD></TR></TABLE>
This is straight BS.

I run Fluidamper and have had no problems with it. Not saying ATI is bad, but there tests to me do not seem accurate. This leads me to believe they altered the tests in some way to try and out sell Fluidamper.

 

I personally went with the fluidampr. Got it from doublej. Great seller btw. I have been very happy with it. I would wager you would be quite happy with either. Read up on them and make an informed decision, that is what I did.

 

I heard that you have to keep the fluidampr in an upright position, as if it was mounted on the engine, or it would get bad. Is that true?

 

fluidamper is to damn bulky..

 

mine was shipped in a box flat. sat flat while my engine was being built. still works.

 

the street version isnt that bad.

 

ATI 7" steel race version here. I need all the insurance I can get. If you cant decide on fluidampr or ATI, just go inny minny miny mo and get one. Its very important to run one of these.

 

Great thread, but it is a hard choice. Laskey which is trusted suggests ATI. Endyn which is trusted suggests Fluidampr. UGH!

 

Going ATI here just for added measure of safety over the stock unit I think, I am running only 1000 rpm more over stock and making just over 600whp. Nothing crazy but couldnt hurt I figure.

 

OEM HERE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM