Any experience with Crower 63403 Cams??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 06:15 PM
  #1  
integranator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Default Any experience with Crower 63403 Cams??

It turns out i've come across a wicked deal for a set of these cams. I've heard they're comparable to the S2 stage 3's, just wondering if these are going to be too big for my 83mm 9:1 turbo motor? Built head, t3/67ho LS/vtec. what do you guys think?
Reply
Old Oct 11, 2007 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
DAneronimo's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: central, oh, us
Default Re: Any experience with Crower 63403 Cams?? (integranator)

how wicked of a deal?? i have a set for sale...
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 10:49 AM
  #3  
turbohf's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,750
Likes: 0
From: Marysville, WA, USA
Default Re: Any experience with Crower 63403 Cams?? (DAneronimo)

i run Crower 63402A's in my B16A i love em... but personally i think that the 403s would be too big for a turbo motor....
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2007 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
integranator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Default

anyone else?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007 | 06:14 AM
  #5  
integranator's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Default Re: (integranator)

anyone?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 12:38 PM
  #6  
Sirfallsalot243's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Doylestown, PA, USA
Default Re: (integranator)

I run them. For your setup, id skip them. Theyre all motor cams- way too much overlap for a turbo motor. You should run stock cams or turbo specific cams.

Im making 192whp all motor with them, and theyre actually a touch smaller than Skunk2 Stage 2 cams. Skunk2's cams run extremely large (IE, A Stage 2 is much bigger than any other companies Stage 2).

Theyre good cams- huge non-vtec lobes make my vtec engagement at 5800rpm. But theyre not good for turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #7  
narfdanarf's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,309
Likes: 0
From: Miura-Shi, Japan
Default Re: (Sirfallsalot243)

Way to contradict yourself. S2S2 are good for boost.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 01:53 PM
  #8  
Sirfallsalot243's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Doylestown, PA, USA
Default Re: (narfdanarf)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by narfdanarf &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Way to contradict yourself. S2S2 are good for boost.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I hope you werent talking to me, as I did not contradict myself.

And S2S2's are not good for boost.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #9  
non-VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 2
From: Toronto, Canada
Default Re: (Sirfallsalot243)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sirfallsalot243 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

And S2S2's are not good for boost.</TD></TR></TABLE>

do a search and you will rethink that statment
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fc_v8
Forced Induction
11
Jul 26, 2010 03:15 AM
92cxhatch169
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
Apr 23, 2010 02:50 PM
175Shot4Door
Forced Induction
1
Feb 11, 2009 08:55 AM
3a_eg_hatch
Forced Induction
2
Jun 11, 2006 11:43 AM
pitchblacksol
Forced Induction
1
Aug 23, 2005 02:30 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:58 PM.