analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!!
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!!
this past weekend i went to carlsbad raceway and ran my crx hf with turbo and i ran a 14.35 @ 97. I was wondering if this was good, bad or normal given the setup.... t25, hf manifold, 450's, 2" IC piping, 1g bov, smc+, custom 2.5" turbo back exhaust. just wondering if this was about right neglecting driver. thanks guys
brian
brian
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Yokohama, Japan, Japan
Posts: 7,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (gritsak)
CR-X HF with a turbo HF engine is pretty damn quick!!!! Great sleeper!! You should keep the "HF" sticker on and kick ***!!
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (MiraiZ)
I got 14.9@97 with totally stock LS swap into my HF, crappy 2.1 60'.
That is a nice time for your trap speed, but anything's good compared to how I drive (like a little girl). You get much respect if it's still HF powered, but I don't see it pulling that well on HF tranny??? More details about your setup, as well as timeslip breakdown, are needed pls.
That is a nice time for your trap speed, but anything's good compared to how I drive (like a little girl). You get much respect if it's still HF powered, but I don't see it pulling that well on HF tranny??? More details about your setup, as well as timeslip breakdown, are needed pls.
#7
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (CRXRageD)
That is a great time for an hf. What kind of tires did you use? I'm hoping to trap around 100 once I get the 14b on my zc. My et will probably still be in the high 14 though .
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (88ZCRX)
oh ****
sorry for the confusion. i have an hf with a dual cam zc in it. sorry to lead you on guys. whoops.
here is the run, 2.34.... 60ft, 6.18.... 330ft, 1/8...9.34 @ 78, 1/4.....14.35 @ 97.55
sorry for the confusion. i have an hf with a dual cam zc in it. sorry to lead you on guys. whoops.
here is the run, 2.34.... 60ft, 6.18.... 330ft, 1/8...9.34 @ 78, 1/4.....14.35 @ 97.55
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: aroundtheworld, inaday, usa
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (CRXRageD)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXRageD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That's pretty good for a 12 valve.</TD></TR></TABLE>
HF's are 8 valve.
HF's are 8 valve.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (ZCHF)
your speed corelates with your time. Your in the area that you should be if your running street tires. (I ran 14.2@98 on street tires)
Your 60' foot times could improve a bit, if you get those down you might be able to get deeper in the 14's. If you straped on some slicks, 13's wouldn't be hard.
Your 60' foot times could improve a bit, if you get those down you might be able to get deeper in the 14's. If you straped on some slicks, 13's wouldn't be hard.
#12
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (technine)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by technine »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
HF's are 8 valve.</TD></TR></TABLE>
My bad, I know something has 12 valves. I just can't remember which engine.
HF's are 8 valve.</TD></TR></TABLE>
My bad, I know something has 12 valves. I just can't remember which engine.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (CRXRageD)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CRXRageD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
My bad, I know something has 12 valves. I just can't remember which engine.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Most 85-87 shizzle; Civic/CRX/Piglude Si, Accord LX-i, and probably some carby cars I could care less about.
My bad, I know something has 12 valves. I just can't remember which engine.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Most 85-87 shizzle; Civic/CRX/Piglude Si, Accord LX-i, and probably some carby cars I could care less about.
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: PRK
Posts: 5,683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (Pengo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pengo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice times, how much boost?</TD></TR></TABLE>
9 psi, pump gas, smc set to -35% of 450's
9 psi, pump gas, smc set to -35% of 450's
#16
Re: analysis of timeslip 14.3 @ 97!!! (ZCHF)
I went 14.3@103.95 in my 90 crx on 6psi....with a 2.4 60'...stock tires dont liek hooking up right away....haha, but thats a good time...get teh 60' down like im tyrying and 13's are in yur sites....
Trav
Trav
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post