350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS
03-02-2004, 03:21 PM
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS
Finally had a chance to tune Louis' car with the cams and intake manifold. They definitely made a big difference!
Heres the setup:
B18B1
STOCK head
Endyn Pistons 9:1
STOCK rods
GE blockguard
Skunk2 intake manifold
Crower cams
ferrea valvetrain
Precision SC61
680cc injectors
2.5" downpipe thermal 3" exhaust
hondata s200
Pump gas 93 octane
The baseline graph was horrible. Torque would peak and drop off hard then peak again..the graph was real jagged. After getting the air/fuel dialed in and about 4-5 pulls changing the cam timing, we came up with this.
This pull was done on 24 psi.
Modified by Willis at 7:33 PM 3/2/2004
Heres the setup:
B18B1
STOCK head
Endyn Pistons 9:1
STOCK rods
GE blockguard
Skunk2 intake manifold
Crower cams
ferrea valvetrain
Precision SC61
680cc injectors
2.5" downpipe thermal 3" exhaust
hondata s200
Pump gas 93 octane
The baseline graph was horrible. Torque would peak and drop off hard then peak again..the graph was real jagged. After getting the air/fuel dialed in and about 4-5 pulls changing the cam timing, we came up with this.
This pull was done on 24 psi.
Modified by Willis at 7:33 PM 3/2/2004
03-02-2004, 03:38 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: you suck donkey nutz, ky
Posts: 6,860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (Burke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Burke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">24 psi on an SC61 - shouldnt that be like 450+hp????</TD></TR></TABLE>
kinda what i was thinkin
kinda what i was thinkin
03-02-2004, 03:38 PM
#5
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: azusa, ca, us
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (Burke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Burke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">24 psi on an SC61 - shouldnt that be like 450+hp????</TD></TR></TABLE>That's what I was thinking
03-02-2004, 03:38 PM
#6
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: On the HT bandwagon
Posts: 4,483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (Burke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Burke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">24 psi on an SC61 - shouldnt that be like 450+hp????</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's what I was thinking. Still nice nonetheless
EDIT: Holy same replies at the same time
That's what I was thinking. Still nice nonetheless
EDIT: Holy same replies at the same time
03-02-2004, 03:42 PM
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gresham/Corvallis, Or, United States
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (Burke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Burke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">24 psi on an SC61 - shouldnt that be like 450+hp????</TD></TR></TABLE>
its should with a better vtec head but with a stock ls head i wouldnt expect any good hp numbers.... especially with 24 psi
its should with a better vtec head but with a stock ls head i wouldnt expect any good hp numbers.... especially with 24 psi
Trending Topics
03-02-2004, 03:52 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (jdmDXrex)
I tuned a gsr with this same turbo. It made 430 to the wheels at 20 psi. This is an LS though...totally different engine.
03-02-2004, 03:55 PM
#11
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 350hp 300 ft lbs Turbo LS (Willis)
with a FMU
03-02-2004, 05:21 PM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ALASKA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (1.83Tc)
i think the fact the numbers are not super high has mostly to do with the fact that it is on pump gas..... probably had to take out a **** load of timing... maybe its just, me but i do not know too many people running 24psi on pump gas.
but im no expert.
300ft/lbs of torque is ok by me though.
but im no expert.
300ft/lbs of torque is ok by me though.
03-02-2004, 05:23 PM
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (1.8t)
14 psi ~270 whp
17 psi ~300
20 psi ~325
24 psi - 350
I wanted to take it higher but we were running out of time so we stopped at 350.
The car is awesome on the street, the powerband is a lot bigger now with the crower cams!
This engine is in a full interior integra with 225/50/15s on the front and they just go up in smoke rolling into boost in 3rd gear on the ls tranny.
The car will be running at Bradenton tomorrow on some bfgs...should see low 12s no problem at about 120 mph.
17 psi ~300
20 psi ~325
24 psi - 350
I wanted to take it higher but we were running out of time so we stopped at 350.
The car is awesome on the street, the powerband is a lot bigger now with the crower cams!
This engine is in a full interior integra with 225/50/15s on the front and they just go up in smoke rolling into boost in 3rd gear on the ls tranny.
The car will be running at Bradenton tomorrow on some bfgs...should see low 12s no problem at about 120 mph.
03-02-2004, 05:25 PM
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (hookonboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hookonboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is that even possible on a stock rods?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes it is!
Yes it is!
